Author Affiliations
1Key Laboratory of Terrestrial Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China2College of Resources and Environment, University of CAS, Beijing 100049, China3Development Planning Bureau, CAS, Beijing 100864, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Study area and its corresponding counties
Fig. 2. Land resource carrying capacity and carrying index in Three-Rivers Region in Tibet in 2000, 2010 and 2015
Fig. 3. Land resource carrying capacity and carrying index in Three-Rivers Region in Tibet from 2000 to 2015
Fig. 4. Water resource carrying capacity and carrying index in Three-Rivers Region in Tibet in 2000, 2010 and 2015
Fig. 5. Water resource carrying capacity and carrying index in Three-Rivers Region in Tibet from 2002 to 2015
Fig. 6. Ecological carrying capacity and carrying index in Three-Rivers Region in Tibet in 2002, 2010 and 2015
Fig. 7. Comprehensive resource carrying index of Three-Rivers Region in Tibet in 2000, 2010 and 2015
Fig. 8. Early warning levels of resource carrying capacity in Three-Rivers Region in Tibet in 2000, 2010 and 2015
承载力类型 | 计算方法 | 计算公式 | 文献来源 |
---|
土地资源承载力 | 土地资源承载力模型; 土地资源承载指数模型 | LCC=G/Gp LCCI=Pa/LCC | 封志明[8] | 水资源承载力 | 水资源承载力模型; 水足迹模型 | EC=0.4γφQw/Pw ec=γWp/Pw
| 赵静等[51]; 陈智举等[52] | 生态承载力 | 生态承载力模型; 生态足迹模型 |
| 赵先贵等[53]; 刘东等[54] |
|
Table 1. Calculation of different calculation methods for resource carrying capacity
资源承载力 | 承载状态 | 状态分级 | 承载指数 |
---|
土地资源承载力 | 粮食盈余 | 富富有余 | 绿色 | LCCI≤ 0.875 | LCCI≤ 0.5 | 富裕 | 0.5<LCCI≤ 0.75 | 盈余 | 0.75<LCCI≤ 0.875 | 人粮平衡 | 平衡有余 | 蓝色 | 0.875<LCCI≤ 1.125 | 0.875<LCCI≤ 1 | 临界超载 | 1<LCCI≤ 1.125 | 人口超载 | 超载 | 红色 | LCCI >1.125 | 1.125<LCCI≤ 1.25 | 过载 | 1.25<LCCI≤ 1.5 | 严重超载 | LCCI >1.5 | 水资源承载力 | 水资源盈余 | 富富有余 | 绿色 | ECI≤ 0.875 | ECI≤ 0.5 | 富裕 | 0.5<ECI≤ 0.75 | 盈余 | 0.75<ECI≤ 0.875 | 人水平衡 | 平衡有余 | 蓝色 | 0.875<ECI≤ 1.125 | 0.875<ECI≤ 1 | 临界超载 | 1<ECI≤ 1.125 | 水资源赤字 | 超载 | 红色 | ECI >1.125 | 1.125<ECI≤ 1.25 | 过载 | 1.25<ECI≤ 1.5 | 严重超载 | ECI >1.5 | 生态承载力 | 生态盈余 | 富富有余 | 绿色 | EFI≤ 0.9 | ECI≤ 0.5 | 富裕 | 0.5<EFI≤ 0.7 | 盈余 | 0.7<EFI≤ 0.9 | 生态平衡 | 平衡有余 | 蓝色 | 0.9<EFI≤ 1.1 | 0.9<EFI≤ 1 | 临界超载 | 1<EFI≤ 1.1 | 生态赤字 | 超载 | 红色 | EFI >1.1 | 1.1<EFI≤ 1.5 | 过载 | 1.5<EFI≤ 2.5 | 严重超载 | EFI >2.5 |
|
Table 2. The carrying status and index grading of different resource carrying capacities
序号 | 判别条件 | 状态类型 | 状态级别 | 等级划分 |
---|
1 | “盈余”状态的资源承载力个数=3 | 无负载 | 绿色 | 六级 | 2 | “临界超载”状态的资源承载力个数=1 | 轻度负载 | 蓝色 | 五级 | 3 | “临界超载”状态的资源承载力个数≥ 2 | 一般负载 | 黄色 | 四级 | 4 | “超载”状态的资源承载力个数=1 | 重度负载 | 橙色 | 三级 | 5 | “超载”状态个数=1且“临界超载”状态个数≥1 | 严重负载 | 红色 | 二级 | 6 | “超载”状态的资源承载力个数≥ 2 | 特别严重负载 | 深红 | 一级 |
|
Table 3. Grading system of resource carrying capacity
Table 4. Resource carrying index, carrying status and grading in Three-Rivers Region in Tibet in 2000, 2010 and 2015