Author Affiliations
1Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China3Center for Animal Health and Productivity, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania 19348, USA4College of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Location of study area
Fig. 2. Distribution of catering providers in the study area Note: (a) the spatial distribution of catering providers in Lhasa’s main city area; (b) the proportions of different kinds of catering providers; and (c) the proportions of the different cuisines of catering providers.
Fig. 3. Standard deviational ellipse of catering providers for (a) different kinds of catering providers and (b) different cuisine types provided by the various kinds of catering providers
Fig. 5. Kernel density estimation of catering providers’ different cuisines types: (a) local; (b) Sichuan; (c) Halal and (d) all others.
Fig. 6. Buffer analysis for different kinds of roads: (a) main roads; (b) secondary roads and (c) branch roads.
Fig. 7. (a) Kernel density estimation of scenic spots and (b) the spatial distribution of different kinds of scenic spots
Fig. 8. Buffer analysis of (a) all scenic spots within the 500 m buffer range, (b) all scenic spots within the 1000 m buffer range, (c) 2A level and above scenic spots in the 1000 m buffer range and (d) 2A level and above scenic spots in the 2000 m buffer range.
Fig. 9. Spatial distribution of (a) population in the main city area of Lhasa, and the distribution of population overlaid with (b) all catering providers, (c) local restaurants, (d) Sichuan restaurants and (e) Halal restaurants.
Fig. 10. Population heat map in the Main City Area of Lhasa.
| Catering providers | Observed mean distance (m) | Expected mean distance (m) | Nearest neighbour ratio | z-score | P-value |
---|
| All catering providers | 26.8839 | 113.3963 | 0.237079 | -95.216245 | 0 | Different kinds of catering providers | Chinese restaurant | 18.8288 | 86.9181 | 0.216627 | -127.552406 | 0 | Chinese fast food restaurant | 82.0259 | 300.0183 | 0.273403 | -34.274909 | 0 | Tea house | 67.0662 | 209.3236 | 0.320395 | -45.948244 | 0 | Western restaurant | 323.4324 | 903.7787 | 0.357867 | -10.055262 | 0 | Pastry shop | 139.0467 | 358.8435 | 0.387486 | -24.156927 | 0 | Snack bar | 186.8654 | 451.0486 | 0.414291 | -18.377602 | 0 | Beverage shop | 355.9832 | 802.3984 | 0.443649 | -9.812716 | 0 | Cafe | 293.8510 | 646.3442 | 0.454635 | -11.941351 | 0 | Western fast food restaurant | 385.0135 | 816.9446 | 0.471285 | -9.159245 | 0 | Hotel | 467.4488 | 877.9511 | 0.532431 | -7.537118 | 0 | Different cuisines of catering provides | Local restaurant | 26.0471 | 108.8846 | 0.239218 | -98.883560 | 0 | Other catering providers | 50.1552 | 167.1834 | 0.300001 | -59.256315 | 0 | Halal restaurant | 213.3069 | 520.5037 | 0.409809 | -16.047207 | 0 | Sichuan restaurant | 153.8062 | 341.9610 | 0.449777 | -22.771546 | 0 |
|
Table 1. Average nearest neighbor analysis results for different kinds of catering providers
Buffer area | Number of catering providers | Proportion (%) |
---|
150 m range buffer of main road | 1768 | 24.41 | 100 m range buffer of secondary road | 5737 | 79.20 | 50 m range buffer of branch road | 5442 | 75.12 |
|
Table 2. Catering provider quantities in buffer areas of different levels of roads and their proportions within the total number of catering providers.
Buffer range | Number of catering providers | Proportion (%) |
---|
500 m | 3960 | 54.67 | 1000 m | 6196 | 85.59 | Above 2A-level 1000 m | 1509 | 20.83 | Above 2A-level 2000 m | 3558 | 49.12 |
|
Table 3. Catering provider distribution within varying buffer ranges of the scenic spots.