• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 23, 2305001 (2021)
Hongju Guo1, Chen Chen1, and Aihong Yang2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Information and Intelligent Engineering, Shanghai Publishing and Printing College,Shanghai 200093, China
  • 2College of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Shandong University of Science and Technology,Qingdao , Shandong 266590, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.2305001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Hongju Guo, Chen Chen, Aihong Yang. Voltage Control of Electromagnetically Induced Grating in Asymmetric Double Quantum Dot System[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(23): 2305001 Copy Citation Text show less
    System under consideration and interaction field. (a) Schematic of energy levels for asymmetric double quantum dot system interacting with probe field and standing-wave pump field; (b) schematic of standing-wave pump field and weak probe field propagating through medium
    Fig. 1. System under consideration and interaction field. (a) Schematic of energy levels for asymmetric double quantum dot system interacting with probe field and standing-wave pump field; (b) schematic of standing-wave pump field and weak probe field propagating through medium
    Absorption and dispersion spectra in double quantum dot system under different conditions. (a) Te=2, ω24=0, Δ2=0, ΩC=0; (b) Te=2, ω24=0, Δ2=0, ΩC=1; (c) Te=2, ω24=1.5, Δ2=2, ΩC=1
    Fig. 2. Absorption and dispersion spectra in double quantum dot system under different conditions. (a) Te=2, ω24=0, Δ2=0, ΩC=0; (b) Te=2, ω24=0, Δ2=0, ΩC=1; (c) Te=2, ω24=1.5, Δ2=2, ΩC=1
    IP(θ) versus sin θ under different conditions. (a) Without tunneling voltage, Te=0, ω24=1.5, Δ2=0, Δ1=0.5, ΩC=1;(b) with tunneling voltage, Te=2, ω24=0, Δ1=0.5, Δ2=0, ΩC=1; (c) with tunneling voltage, Te=2, ω24=1.5, Δ1=0.6,Δ2=2, ΩC=1
    Fig. 3. IP(θ) versus sin θ under different conditions. (a) Without tunneling voltage, Te=0, ω24=1.5, Δ2=0, Δ1=0.5, ΩC=1;(b) with tunneling voltage, Te=2, ω24=0, Δ1=0.5, Δ2=0, ΩC=1; (c) with tunneling voltage, Te=2, ω24=1.5, Δ1=0.6,Δ2=2, ΩC=1
    First-order diffraction intensity versus Te under ω24=1.5, Δ1=0.6, Δ2=2, and ΩC=1
    Fig. 4. First-order diffraction intensity versus Te under ω24=1.5, Δ1=0.6, Δ2=2, and ΩC=1
    First-order diffraction intensity versus ΩC under Te=2.9, ω24=1.5, Δ1=0.6, and Δ2=2
    Fig. 5. First-order diffraction intensity versus ΩC under Te=2.9, ω24=1.5, Δ1=0.6, and Δ2=2
    Hongju Guo, Chen Chen, Aihong Yang. Voltage Control of Electromagnetically Induced Grating in Asymmetric Double Quantum Dot System[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(23): 2305001
    Download Citation