• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 39, Issue 12, 1212004 (2019)
Shuangle Wu, Huiran Hu, Shimin Zhong, Fangyuan Sun, Qihan Zhao, and Yonghong Wang*
Author Affiliations
  • School of Instrument Science and Opto-Electronics Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Anhui 230009, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS201939.1212004 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Shuangle Wu, Huiran Hu, Shimin Zhong, Fangyuan Sun, Qihan Zhao, Yonghong Wang. Automatic Extraction of Speckle Interference Fringe Regions[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(12): 1212004 Copy Citation Text show less
    Comparison of detection results of several edge detection operators. (a) Original image; (b) Sobel detection result; (c) Canny detection result; (d) Laplacian detection result
    Fig. 1. Comparison of detection results of several edge detection operators. (a) Original image; (b) Sobel detection result; (c) Canny detection result; (d) Laplacian detection result
    Gray histograms before and after Laplacian transformation. (a) Interference fringes; (b) gray histograms of speckle background region; (c) gray histograms of speckle interference fringe region
    Fig. 2. Gray histograms before and after Laplacian transformation. (a) Interference fringes; (b) gray histograms of speckle background region; (c) gray histograms of speckle interference fringe region
    Segmentation result of second-order gradient entropy
    Fig. 3. Segmentation result of second-order gradient entropy
    Result of binary region extraction
    Fig. 4. Result of binary region extraction
    Result of interference fringe region extraction
    Fig. 5. Result of interference fringe region extraction
    Flow chart of algorithm for speckle interference fringe region extraction
    Fig. 6. Flow chart of algorithm for speckle interference fringe region extraction
    Second-order gradient entropies of different speckle interference fringe patterns. (a) Shearography fringes of circular measured object (left) and their second-order gradient entropy (right); (b) digital speckle interference fringes of circular measured object (left) and their second-order gradient entropy (right); (c) shearography fringes of rectangular measured object (left) and their second-order gradient entropy (right); (d) digital speckle interference fringes of rectangular object with sli
    Fig. 7. Second-order gradient entropies of different speckle interference fringe patterns. (a) Shearography fringes of circular measured object (left) and their second-order gradient entropy (right); (b) digital speckle interference fringes of circular measured object (left) and their second-order gradient entropy (right); (c) shearography fringes of rectangular measured object (left) and their second-order gradient entropy (right); (d) digital speckle interference fringes of rectangular object with sli
    Gray entropy corresponding to Fig. 7(a)
    Fig. 8. Gray entropy corresponding to Fig. 7(a)
    Interception results of background and stripe areas
    Fig. 9. Interception results of background and stripe areas
    Verification results of fringe region and background region. (a) Gray entropy of background region; (b) gray entropy of fringe region; (c) second-order gradient entropy of background region; (d) second-order gradient entropy of fringe region
    Fig. 10. Verification results of fringe region and background region. (a) Gray entropy of background region; (b) gray entropy of fringe region; (c) second-order gradient entropy of background region; (d) second-order gradient entropy of fringe region
    Classical interference fringe patterns. (a)-(c) Shearography fringes of objects with different shapes; (d)-(e) digital speckle interference fringes of objects with different shapes
    Fig. 11. Classical interference fringe patterns. (a)-(c) Shearography fringes of objects with different shapes; (d)-(e) digital speckle interference fringes of objects with different shapes
    Interference fringe regions manually extracted in classical interference fringes shown in Fig. 11
    Fig. 12. Interference fringe regions manually extracted in classical interference fringes shown in Fig. 11
    Different interference fringe patterns and corresponding extraction results. (a)-(h) Speckle interference fringe patterns; (a')-(h') extraction results of fringe region
    Fig. 13. Different interference fringe patterns and corresponding extraction results. (a)-(h) Speckle interference fringe patterns; (a')-(h') extraction results of fringe region
    ParameterGradient entropyAverage
    Fig. 11(a)Fig. 11(b)Fig. 11(c)Fig. 11 (d)Fig. 11(e)
    Max1(Q)6.86296.36555.5986.12256.94196.3782
    Table 1. Second-order gradient entropy corresponding to Fig. 11
    ParameterGradient entropyAverage
    Fig. 12 (a)Fig. 12(b)Fig. 12(c)Fig. 12(d)Fig. 12(e)
    Max2(Q)5.66035.29494.57754.43365.55065.1034
    Min(Q)000.45710.35370.49990.2621
    Avg(Q)1.52111.71052.12471.58701.97781.7842
    Diff(max)1.20261.07061.02051.68891.39131.2748
    Table 2. Second-order gradient entropy corresponding to Fig. 12
    Shuangle Wu, Huiran Hu, Shimin Zhong, Fangyuan Sun, Qihan Zhao, Yonghong Wang. Automatic Extraction of Speckle Interference Fringe Regions[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(12): 1212004
    Download Citation