Author Affiliations
1Advanced Institute of Photonics, School of Information Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou , Guangdong 510006, China2Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Information Photonics Technology, Guangzhou , Guangdong 510006, China3Synergy Innovation Institute of GDUT, Heyuan , Guangdong 517000, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. General scheme of the FBG inscription setup
[13] Fig. 2. Three individual cores of seven-core fiber are selected for FBG inscription
[13]. (a) FBG distribution on fiber cores;(b) grating inscription results for three cores
Fig. 3. Three cores of the seven-core fiber are selected for simultaneous TFBG inscription
[14]. (a) Schematic diagram of TFBG inscription; (b)‒(d) spectra of three cores
Fig. 4. Effect of different focus positions on selective inscription
[17]. (a) Schematic diagram of laser focus position;(b)‒(d) spectra of three inscription schemes
Fig. 5. FBGs were fabricated using the SSDUW technique
[18]. (a) SSDUW setup;(b) schematic diagram of grating location in multicore fiber and resulting optical reflection spectrum of each core
Fig. 6. Selective inscription based on femtosecond laser and phase mask
[21]. (a) Schematic of femtosecond laser writing system; (b) spectrum of core A
Fig. 7. Femtosecond laser inscription scheme of Donko's team
[23]. (a) Femtosecond laser grating writing device; (b) microscope image of 7-core MCF cross section
Fig. 8. Point-by-point FBG inscription structure proposed by Wolf's team
[24] Fig. 9. Femtosecond laser selective inscription based on plane-by-plane inscription.(a) Schematic of setup for plane-by-plane grating fabrication
[26]; (b) schematic of six FBG arrays inscribed in 7-core optical fiber; (c) spectra of FBG array measured for one of cores of 7-core optical fiber
[27] Fig. 10. FBGs selectively inscribed in seven-core spun fiber by femtosecond laser
[28]. (a) State diagram of femtosecond laser pulse picker and velocity profile of fiber when longitudinal FBG array is inscribed; (b) reflection spectra of seven-core inscribed with a fixed period in a single pass
Fig. 11. Schematic of the light trace of a seven-core fiber with full-cores FBG inscription
[29] Fig. 12. Schematic of reel-to-reel array inscription apparatus for inscribing gratings in twisted multicore fiber
[31] Fig. 13. Schematic diagram of a full-core inscribed grating based on a three-core plane
[13]. (a) FBG distribution on fiber cores;(b) results for gratings inscriptions
Fig. 14. RFBG fabrication scheme
[32]. (a) Schematic of full-core inscribed FBG by phase-mask method; (b) RFBG spectra in four cores
Fig. 15. Before-after comparison of grating spectra with modified core photosensitivity and adjustment of position
[35] Fig. 16. Full-core FBG inscription of DPAMCF. (a) Cross-section of DPAMCF; (b) transmission spectra of DPAMCF-FBGs when plane containing six cores is parallel to phase mask
[36] Fig. 17. Full-core inscription scheme of Emma Lindley's team. (a) Before-after comparison of UV power distribution in a seven-core fiber using polished capillaries; (b) transmission spectra of gratings inscribed in seven-core fiber after using a capillary
[37] Fig. 18. Full-core inscription based on defocusing phase mask technology
[38]. (a) Schematic experimental setup of TFCF FBGs inscription system; (b) transmission spectra of four cores
Fig. 19. Spectra of four-core fiber with core position presents rhombus and square distribution
[17] Fig. 20. Schematic diagram of cross-section of a seven-core fiber surrounded by air holes
[39] Fig. 21. DTG's full-core inscription scheme. (a) Schematic diagram of DTG fabrication setup; (b) reflection spectrum of DTG array in four cores
[40] Fig. 22. Seven-core FBGs full-core inscription using a modified Talbot interferometer
[41]. (a) Modified Talbot interferometer; (b) transmission spectra of the FBGs inscribed in a seven-core fiber
Fig. 23. Full-core inscription based on CO
2 laser
[43]. (a) Schematic diagram of HLPG inscription; (b) spectrum of the fourth HLPG sample and spectrum of the main couplings of the other HLPGs with various pitches
Fig. 24. Full-core inscription based on the electrodes arc discharges method
[44]. (a) Schematic of LPFG fabrication and monitoring platform for programmable electrodes arc discharges method based on a fiber optic fusion splicer;(b)‒(h) transmission spectra of LPFGs in seven cores; (i) crosstalk measured in outer cores
Core number | Period /µm | Bragg wavelengthλB /nm | -3 dB bandwidth /nm | Extinction ratio /dB | Refractive index modulation ∆n /10-3 |
---|
2 | 1.598 ± 0.001 | 1541.01 ± 0.02 | 0.28 ± 0.03 | 13.97 ± 0.40 | 2.56 ± 0.06 | 3 | 1.605 ± 0.001 | 1547.82 ± 0.02 | 0.22 ± 0.03 | 16.02 ± 0.40 | 2.92 ± 0.06 | 4 | 1.589 ± 0.001 | 1532.66 ± 0.02 | 0.16 ± 0.03 | 10.08 ± 0.40 | 2.07 ± 0.02 | 6 | 1.594 ± 0.001 | 1537.42 ± 0.02 | 0.18 ± 0.03 | 13.40 ± 0.40 | 2.38 ± 0.17 |
|
Table 1. Characteristics of FBGs inscribed in four fiber cores
[23] Optical source | Ultraviolet | Femtosecond laser |
---|
Photosensitivity | High | Low | Accuracy of inscription | Low | High | System complexity | Low | High | Grating period | Limited by phase mask | Determined by the speed of the light source | Flexibility | Low | High | Grating stability | Low | High | Insertion loss | Low | High |
|
Table 2. Comparison of the selective inscription performance of two optical sources
Sample | Number of rotations | Angle of each rotation /(°) | Time for each inscription /s | Average 3 dB bandwidth /nm | Maximum reflection /dB | Average reflection /dB | η |
---|
1 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 0.221 | 15.694 | 13.885 | 0.388 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 0.431 | 23.087 | 19.004 | 1.782 | 3 | 6 | 60 | 7 | 0.17 | 16.907 | 12.242 | 0.194 | 4 | 6 | 60 | 10 | 0.127 | 19.159 | 15.378 | 0.233 | 5 | 6 | 60 | 30 | 0.637 | 21.07 | 17.483 | 0.606 | 6 | 3 | 120 | - | 0.118 | 20.843 | 14.239 | 0.396 |
|
Table 3. Grating characteristics of six samples
[34] Item | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 | R6 | R7 |
---|
neff (simulation) | 1.4447 | 1.4447 | 1.4448 | 1.4449 | 1.4448 | 1.4446 | 1.4447 | λB (experiment) /nm | 1549.31 | 1549.49 | 1549.55 | 1549.78 | 1549.67 | 1549.23 | 1549.52 | neff (experiment) | 1.4426 | 1.4428 | 1.4428 | 1.4430 | 1.4429 | 1.4425 | 1.4428 | Strain sensitivity /(pm/με) | 1.03 | 1.04 | 1.06 | 1.07 | 1.05 | 1.06 | 1.06 | Temperature sensitivity /(pm/με) | 10.05 | 9.85 | 11.14 | 11.90 | 10.05 | 10.15 | 11.02 |
|
Table 4. Effective refractive index (
neff), Bragg wavelength (
λB), and its strain and temperature sensitivities according to numerical simulations and experiments in all of the 7 cores (where R1‒R6 are the external cores and R7 is the central core) of the MCF
[39]