• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 57, Issue 6, 061009 (2020)
Zexing Du*, Jinyong Yin, and Jian Yang
Author Affiliations
  • Computer Division of Jiangsu Automation Research Institution, Lianyungang, Jiangsu 222002, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP57.061009 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Zexing Du, Jinyong Yin, Jian Yang. Remote Sensing Aircraft Image Detection Based on Semi-Supervised Learning[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(6): 061009 Copy Citation Text show less
    Information extracted by the convolutional structure of each layer in CNN structure
    Fig. 1. Information extracted by the convolutional structure of each layer in CNN structure
    Generator network model for coarse-grained network
    Fig. 2. Generator network model for coarse-grained network
    Discriminator network model for coarse-grained network
    Fig. 3. Discriminator network model for coarse-grained network
    Discriminator network model for fine-grained network
    Fig. 4. Discriminator network model for fine-grained network
    Extracted objects to be detected by tailoring
    Fig. 5. Extracted objects to be detected by tailoring
    Model of object detection network
    Fig. 6. Model of object detection network
    Part of dataset
    Fig. 7. Part of dataset
    Loss function values for different models in coarse-grained network. (a) Discriminator network; (b) generator network
    Fig. 8. Loss function values for different models in coarse-grained network. (a) Discriminator network; (b) generator network
    Loss function values for different models in fine-grained network. (a) Discriminator network; (b) generator network
    Fig. 9. Loss function values for different models in fine-grained network. (a) Discriminator network; (b) generator network
    Airplane images produced by fine-grained network
    Fig. 10. Airplane images produced by fine-grained network
    Change in loss function value during the training process
    Fig. 11. Change in loss function value during the training process
    Part of detection results
    Fig. 12. Part of detection results
    Loss function value curves during the training process. (a) With GAN for pretraining; (b) without GAN for pretraining
    Fig. 13. Loss function value curves during the training process. (a) With GAN for pretraining; (b) without GAN for pretraining
    Comparison of the mAP of different network models
    Fig. 14. Comparison of the mAP of different network models
    With GANWithout GAN
    Training step200500100020005001000200050008000
    Loss0.260.140.140.130.500.400.360.190.35
    Table 1. Loss function value variation with the number of training steps
    LabeleddatamAP /%
    SSDFaster-RCNNYOLOv3Withoutcoarse-grained networkWithoutfine-grained networkWith GAN
    10038.4035.2637.4756.8235.7360.80
    30043.8538.7542.0667.1040.2170.93
    50048.7142.9247.8375.3142.8076.19
    100057.6950.3858.0475.4951.8277.27
    200068.0665.7369.4175.9364.7377.49
    300076.5074.5176.6276.4574.0677.93
    500078.0477.2878.1277.5276.7178.17
    Table 2. Effect of sample size on detection accuracy
    MethodSSDFaster-RCNNYOLOv3Ours
    FPS /(frame·s-1)4693549
    Table 3. Detection speed of different detection methods
    Zexing Du, Jinyong Yin, Jian Yang. Remote Sensing Aircraft Image Detection Based on Semi-Supervised Learning[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(6): 061009
    Download Citation