• Advanced Photonics
  • Vol. 5, Issue 4, 046006 (2023)
Zheng Zhu1、2、3、†, Yuquan Zhang1、*, Shuoshuo Zhang1, Aurèle J. L. Adam3, Changjun Min1, Hendrik Paul Urbach3、*, and Xiaocong Yuan2、1、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Shenzhen University, Institute of Microscale Optoelectronics and State Key Laboratory of Radio Frequency Heterogeneous Integration, Nanophotonics Research Center, Shenzhen, China
  • 2Research Institute of Intelligent Sensing, Research Center for Humanoid Sensing, Zhejiang Lab, Hangzhou, China
  • 2Shenzhen University, Institute of Microscale Optoelectronics and State Key Laboratory of Radio Frequency Heterogeneous Integration, Nanophotonics Research Center, Shenzhen, China
  • 3Delft University of Technology, Optics Research Group, Delft, The Netherlands
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1117/1.AP.5.4.046006 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Zheng Zhu, Yuquan Zhang, Shuoshuo Zhang, Aurèle J. L. Adam, Changjun Min, Hendrik Paul Urbach, Xiaocong Yuan. Nonlinear optical trapping effect with reverse saturable absorption[J]. Advanced Photonics, 2023, 5(4): 046006 Copy Citation Text show less
    Nonlinear absorption of gold nanoparticles. (a) Coefficient of nonlinear absorption κ against the two-photon absorption coefficient β and the peak intensity of excitation field Ipeak. The white solid line marks the boundary between the SA and RSA regimes. (b) Change in the coefficient of nonlinear absorption κ as a function of Ipeak when β=29 cm/GW. The black dashed line in panel (b) is the dividing line between the SA and RSA regimes. The diameter of the gold nanoparticle is 60 nm; the medium in which the particle was immersed is water.
    Fig. 1. Nonlinear absorption of gold nanoparticles. (a) Coefficient of nonlinear absorption κ against the two-photon absorption coefficient β and the peak intensity of excitation field Ipeak. The white solid line marks the boundary between the SA and RSA regimes. (b) Change in the coefficient of nonlinear absorption κ as a function of Ipeak when β=29  cm/GW. The black dashed line in panel (b) is the dividing line between the SA and RSA regimes. The diameter of the gold nanoparticle is 60 nm; the medium in which the particle was immersed is water.
    Nonlinear polarizability and extinction cross section of gold nanoparticles. (a) Peak intensity of the focused excitation field as a function of averaged incident power Pave ranging from 0 to 2.0 W. (b) Real and imaginary parts of the nonlinear polarizability α change with increasing excitation intensity. (c) Extinction cross section σext varies with excitation intensity; a maximum value occurs for SA and RSA. Dashed lines in panels (b) and (c) mark threshold values between SA and RSA.
    Fig. 2. Nonlinear polarizability and extinction cross section of gold nanoparticles. (a) Peak intensity of the focused excitation field as a function of averaged incident power Pave ranging from 0 to 2.0 W. (b) Real and imaginary parts of the nonlinear polarizability α change with increasing excitation intensity. (c) Extinction cross section σext varies with excitation intensity; a maximum value occurs for SA and RSA. Dashed lines in panels (b) and (c) mark threshold values between SA and RSA.
    Nonlinear optical tweezers within the RSA regime. (a) and (b) Schematics of the trapping states of gold nanoparticles within the early and deep RSA regimes. (c) and (d) Recorded particle trajectories obtained from experiments operating in the early and deep RSA regimes, respectively.
    Fig. 3. Nonlinear optical tweezers within the RSA regime. (a) and (b) Schematics of the trapping states of gold nanoparticles within the early and deep RSA regimes. (c) and (d) Recorded particle trajectories obtained from experiments operating in the early and deep RSA regimes, respectively.
    Switching of the nonlinear optical tweezers from the early to the deep RSA regime. (a)–(c) Radial optical force and (d)–(f) trapping potential distributions in the focal plane acting on the gold nanoparticle, for averaged incident power Pave=0.7 W, 1.15 W, and 1.54 W, corresponding to respective points D, E, and F labeled in Fig. 2. (g) and (h) Experimental screenshots of gold nanoparticles trapped under incident powers of 1.15 and 1.54 W, respectively. Because of the distinctive trapping potential formed within the deep RSA regime, a gold nanoparticle is constrained stably at the center, while another performs an outer circumgyration (Video 1, MP4, 888 KB [URL: https://doi.org/10.1117/1.AP.5.4.046006.s1]; Video 2, MP4, 200 KB [URL: https://doi.org/10.1117/1.AP.5.4.046006.s2]).
    Fig. 4. Switching of the nonlinear optical tweezers from the early to the deep RSA regime. (a)–(c) Radial optical force and (d)–(f) trapping potential distributions in the focal plane acting on the gold nanoparticle, for averaged incident power Pave=0.7  W, 1.15 W, and 1.54 W, corresponding to respective points D, E, and F labeled in Fig. 2. (g) and (h) Experimental screenshots of gold nanoparticles trapped under incident powers of 1.15 and 1.54 W, respectively. Because of the distinctive trapping potential formed within the deep RSA regime, a gold nanoparticle is constrained stably at the center, while another performs an outer circumgyration (Video 1, MP4, 888 KB [URL: https://doi.org/10.1117/1.AP.5.4.046006.s1]; Video 2, MP4, 200 KB [URL: https://doi.org/10.1117/1.AP.5.4.046006.s2]).
    Zheng Zhu, Yuquan Zhang, Shuoshuo Zhang, Aurèle J. L. Adam, Changjun Min, Hendrik Paul Urbach, Xiaocong Yuan. Nonlinear optical trapping effect with reverse saturable absorption[J]. Advanced Photonics, 2023, 5(4): 046006
    Download Citation