• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 59, Issue 2, 0228003 (2022)
Fubin Wang1, Rui Wang1、*, and Chen Wu2
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Electrical Engineering, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan , Hebei 063210, China
  • 2Tang Steel International Engineering Technology Co., Ltd., Tangshan , Hebei 063000, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202259.0228003 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Fubin Wang, Rui Wang, Chen Wu. Classification of Sintered Flame Images Based on Improved Clustering Algorithm[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(2): 0228003 Copy Citation Text show less
    The H channel controls the range of different color values
    Fig. 1. The H channel controls the range of different color values
    Flowchart of the proposed algorithm
    Fig. 2. Flowchart of the proposed algorithm
    Comparison of segmentation effects. (a) Original sintering images; (b) K=2; (c) K=3; (d) K=4
    Fig. 3. Comparison of segmentation effects. (a) Original sintering images; (b) K=2; (c) K=3; (d) K=4
    Comparison of color extraction effect. (a) Image segmented by K-mean algorithm; (b) red fire area after color extraction
    Fig. 4. Comparison of color extraction effect. (a) Image segmented by K-mean algorithm; (b) red fire area after color extraction
    Geometric feature data. (a) Area; (b) long axis; (c) minor axis; (d) eccentricity; (e) Euler number; (f) aspect ratio
    Fig. 5. Geometric feature data. (a) Area; (b) long axis; (c) minor axis; (d) eccentricity; (e) Euler number; (f) aspect ratio
    Classification results of FCM algorithm. (a) Before denoising; (b) after denoising
    Fig. 6. Classification results of FCM algorithm. (a) Before denoising; (b) after denoising
    Comparison of number of iterations. (a) K-FCM; (b) conventional FCM
    Fig. 7. Comparison of number of iterations. (a) K-FCM; (b) conventional FCM
    Comparison of classification membership. (a) K-FCM; (b) conventional FCM
    Fig. 8. Comparison of classification membership. (a) K-FCM; (b) conventional FCM
    Comparison of clustering results. (a) K-FCM; (b) conventional FCM
    Fig. 9. Comparison of clustering results. (a) K-FCM; (b) conventional FCM
    ParameterK-FCMConventional FCM
    Accuracy /%98.8172.62
    Table 1. Comparison of classification accuracy
    ModelNormal combustionUndersinteringOversintering
    Conventional FCM72.9710070.59
    K-FCM10010097.06
    Table 2. Comparison of classification accuracy of the three classification results
    Fubin Wang, Rui Wang, Chen Wu. Classification of Sintered Flame Images Based on Improved Clustering Algorithm[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(2): 0228003
    Download Citation