• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 59, Issue 16, 1615008 (2022)
Jianbin Qiu, Qianying Zheng*, and Jinling Yu
Author Affiliations
  • Institute of Micro-Nano Devices and Solar Cells, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, Fujian , China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202259.1615008 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Jianbin Qiu, Qianying Zheng, Jinling Yu. Stereo Matching Based on Fusion Cost and Adaptive Penalty Coefficient[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(16): 1615008 Copy Citation Text show less
    Flow chart of proposed stereo matching algorithm
    Fig. 1. Flow chart of proposed stereo matching algorithm
    Disparity maps based on three fusion methods. (a) Proposed cost calculation method; (b) F2; (c) F3
    Fig. 2. Disparity maps based on three fusion methods. (a) Proposed cost calculation method; (b) F2; (c) F3
    Average error rates of three regions
    Fig. 3. Average error rates of three regions
    Disparity maps based on three aggregation methods. (a) Proposed cost aggregation method; (b) A2; (c) A3
    Fig. 4. Disparity maps based on three aggregation methods. (a) Proposed cost aggregation method; (b) A2; (c) A3
    Aggregation average error rates of three regions
    Fig. 5. Aggregation average error rates of three regions
    Multi-step optimization results. (a) Cones; (b) Teddy; (c) Tsukuba
    Fig. 6. Multi-step optimization results. (a) Cones; (b) Teddy; (c) Tsukuba
    ConesTeddyTsukubaAverage
    FSCensus7.9911.292.497.26
    NonLocalFilter8.4511.601.857.30
    AdaptAggrDP13.2014.303.5010.33
    SPFilter13.7711.445.4010.20
    LCVB-DEM13.6016.305.2311.71
    TextureCT10.3311.722.728.26
    Proposed method7.9310.892.707.17
    Table 1. Avg_all comparison of all regions
    ConesTeddyTsukubaAverage
    FSCensus2.666.012.133.60
    NonLocalFilter2.876.011.473.45
    AdaptAggrDP5.536.791.574.63
    SPFilter6.156.274.575.66
    LCVB-DEM6.569.994.497.01
    TextureCT5.876.354.545.59
    Proposed method2.364.861.432.88
    Table 2. Avg_nocc comparison of non-occluded regions
    ConesTeddyTsukubaAverage
    FSCensus7.7815.989.2210.99
    NonLocalFilter8.1014.307.8810.09
    AdaptAggrDP14.8016.208.2713.09
    SPFilter17.3018.8116.6017.57
    LCVB-DEM18.2026.1021.3021.87
    TextureCT8.3217.1610.1111.86
    Proposed method7.0012.767.419.05
    Table 3. Avg_disc comparison of parallax discontinuous regions
    Jianbin Qiu, Qianying Zheng, Jinling Yu. Stereo Matching Based on Fusion Cost and Adaptive Penalty Coefficient[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(16): 1615008
    Download Citation