• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 16, 1610020 (2021)
Jinghui Chu, Hao Huang, and Wei Lü*
Author Affiliations
  • School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.1610020 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Jinghui Chu, Hao Huang, Wei Lü. Anchor-Free Traffic Sign Recognition Algorithm Based on Attention Model[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(16): 1610020 Copy Citation Text show less
    Structure of AAFCNN model
    Fig. 1. Structure of AAFCNN model
    Structure of semantic connection path
    Fig. 2. Structure of semantic connection path
    Different attention modules. (a) Channel attention module; (b) spatial attention module
    Fig. 3. Different attention modules. (a) Channel attention module; (b) spatial attention module
    Structure of attention model
    Fig. 4. Structure of attention model
    Size distribution of traffic signs in TT100K dataset
    Fig. 5. Size distribution of traffic signs in TT100K dataset
    Accuracy-recall curves of traffic signs at three scales. (a) Pixel interval of (0,32); (b) pixel interval of (32,96]; (c) pixel interval of (96,400]
    Fig. 6. Accuracy-recall curves of traffic signs at three scales. (a) Pixel interval of (0,32); (b) pixel interval of (32,96]; (c) pixel interval of (96,400]
    Part of visual recognition results of AAFCNN model
    Fig. 7. Part of visual recognition results of AAFCNN model
    MethodBackboneParams /106IndexS /%M /%L /%
    Faster R-CNNResNet-10152.2Recall72.091.391.5
    Precision76.187.586.1
    F1-score74.089.488.7
    Faster R-CNN +FPNResNet-10160.1Recall86.695.595.1
    Precision85.092.992.3
    F1-score85.894.293.7
    Ref. [15]81.2Recall87.493.687.7
    Precision81.790.890.6
    F1-score84.592.089.1
    RetinaNetResNeXt-10194.7Recall87.495.193.1
    Precision84.395.994.2
    F1-score85.895.593.6
    FCOSResNeXt-10189.7Recall88.795.692.4
    Precision85.696.493.5
    F1-score86.896.093.0
    CenterNetHourglassNet191.3Recall89.796.092.4
    Precision90.196.794.9
    F1-score89.996.393.6
    AAFCNNDenseNet-12148.1Recall90.695.693.1
    Precision91.297.396.8
    F1-score90.996.494.9
    Table 1. Performance comparison of different traffic sign recognition methods
    BackboneParams /106AP /%
    SML
    DenseNet-12148.163.480.186.1
    DenseNet-16965.462.579.986.1
    DenseNet-201101.461.779.785.7
    DenseNet-264154.861.980.085.0
    Table 2. Effect of depth of densely connected network on recognition performance
    LocationParams /106AP /%
    SML
    In coding path48.163.480.186.1
    In decoding path47.862.180.085.8
    Both coding path and decoding path48.262.680.085.1
    Table 3. Effect of location of attention model on recognition performance
    ModelParams /106AP /%
    SML
    Base14.160.879.785.9
    Base+AM14.261.779.885.1
    Base+SCP47.861.980.087.2
    Base+AM+SCP48.163.480.186.1
    Table 4. Performance comparison of each module
    Jinghui Chu, Hao Huang, Wei Lü. Anchor-Free Traffic Sign Recognition Algorithm Based on Attention Model[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(16): 1610020
    Download Citation