• Journal of Geographical Sciences
  • Vol. 30, Issue 2, 319 (2020)
Fangqu NIU1、2、3, Xinyu YANG1、3, and Xiaoping ZHANG3、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
  • 2. Collaborative Innovation Center for Geopolitical Setting of Southwest China and Borderland Development, Kunming 650500, China
  • 3. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1007/s11442-020-1730-y Cite this Article
    Fangqu NIU, Xinyu YANG, Xiaoping ZHANG. Application of an evaluation method of resource and environment carrying capacity in the adjustment of industrial structure in Tibet[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(2): 319 Copy Citation Text show less
    Study area: Tibet, China
    Fig. 1. Study area: Tibet, China
    The RECC evaluation framework
    Fig. 2. The RECC evaluation framework
    RECC comparisons by scenario
    Fig. 3. RECC comparisons by scenario
    IndustriesOutput valueInfluence coefficientResponse coefficientIndustrial potential
    Industry 1X11X12X13X14
    Industry 2X21X22X23X24
    Industry 3X31X32X33X34
    ……
    Industry mXm1Xm2Xm3Xm4
    Table 1.

    Industrial evaluation index matrix

    ClassIndustry typeWeightRank
    First ClassNon-ferrous metal mining and dressing industry0.6171
    Tourism0.3332
    Wine and beverage and refined tea manufacturing industry0.1823
    Second ClassPharmaceutical industry0.1544
    Chemical raw materials and chemical products manufacturing industry0.1375
    Printing and recording media reproduction0.1326
    Paper and paper products industry0.1277
    Culture, education, arts & crafts, sports and entertainment products manufacturing industry0.1278
    Food manufacturing0.1189
    Agricultural and sideline food processing industry0.11610
    Third ClassElectric power and thermal production and supply industry0.07811
    Non-metallic mineral products industry0.07412
    Ferrous metal mining and dressing industry0.05313
    Textile industry0.04714
    Wood processing and wood, bamboo, rattan, and brown grass products industry0.03315
    Electrical machinery and equipment manufacturing industry0.03016
    Non-metallic mining and dressing industry0.01717
    Table 2.

    Industry weights in Tibet, China

    ClassIndustry typeWater consumptionCODdischargeLand consumption
    m3/104 yuan of GDPkg/104 yuan of GDPha/108 yuan of GDP
    First ClassNon-ferrous metal mining and dressing industry106.54.88112.63
    Tourism24.639.852.88
    Wine and beverage and refined tea manufacturing industry79.412.0933.19
    Second ClassPharmaceutical industry48.745.4415.98
    Chemical raw materials and chemical products manufacturing industry100.86.3735.83
    Printing and recording media reproduction19.80.321.27
    Paper and paper products industry450.3390.28188.41
    Culture, education, arts & crafts, sports and entertainment products manufacturing industry20.680.221.02
    Food manufacturing60.726.4420.82
    Agricultural and sideline food processing industry93.7312.4630.59
    Third ClassElectric power and thermal production and supply industry908.460.69200.00
    Non-metallic mineral products industry43.620.9371.01
    Ferrous metal mining and dressing industry93.851.1416.23
    Textile industry160.447.0231.51
    Wood processing and wood, bamboo, rattan, and brown grass products industry34.321.5412.85
    Electrical machinery and equipment manufacturing11.890.180.12
    Non-metallic mining and dressing industry133.531.7536.58
    Table 3.

    Intensities of resource consumption and pollution emission by industry

    Carrying capacitiesBusiness as usual(Scenario 1)Focus on developing pillar industries (Scenario 2)Focus on developing tourism(Scenario 3)
    Population(100 million)Economy(trillion yuan)Population(100 million)Economy(trillion yuan)Population(100 million)Economy(trillion yuan)
    WRCC0.812.574.8715.446.4820.53
    WECC2.257.411.936.112.086.58
    LRCC0.040.120.050.170.250.79
    Table 4.

    Regional resource and environment carrying capacity evaluation

    Fangqu NIU, Xinyu YANG, Xiaoping ZHANG. Application of an evaluation method of resource and environment carrying capacity in the adjustment of industrial structure in Tibet[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(2): 319
    Download Citation