• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 12, 1210004 (2021)
Liangfu Li, Biao Wu*, and Nan Wang
Author Affiliations
  • School of Computer Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710119, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.1210004 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Liangfu Li, Biao Wu, Nan Wang. Method for Bridge Crack Detection Based on Multiresolution Network[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(12): 1210004 Copy Citation Text show less
    Different types of bridge cracks. (a) Single small crack; (b) single thick crack; (c) cross crack; (d) reticulated crack
    Fig. 1. Different types of bridge cracks. (a) Single small crack; (b) single thick crack; (c) cross crack; (d) reticulated crack
    Partial images of expanded bridge crack image dataset. (a) Original images; (b) 90° rotation; (c) 180° rotation; (d) horizontal flip; (e) vertical flip
    Fig. 2. Partial images of expanded bridge crack image dataset. (a) Original images; (b) 90° rotation; (c) 180° rotation; (d) horizontal flip; (e) vertical flip
    Structure of multi-resolution network model
    Fig. 3. Structure of multi-resolution network model
    Schematic of fusion operation. (a) Low and medium resolution merged into high resolution; (b) high and low resolution merge into medium resolution; (c) medium and high resolution merge into low resolution
    Fig. 4. Schematic of fusion operation. (a) Low and medium resolution merged into high resolution; (b) high and low resolution merge into medium resolution; (c) medium and high resolution merge into low resolution
    HRBCS model
    Fig. 5. HRBCS model
    Schematic of feature extraction block
    Fig. 6. Schematic of feature extraction block
    Crack detection results of different algorithms. (a) Original images; (b) labelling; (c) threshold segmentation algorithm; (d) Canny algorithm; (e) proposed algorithm
    Fig. 7. Crack detection results of different algorithms. (a) Original images; (b) labelling; (c) threshold segmentation algorithm; (d) Canny algorithm; (e) proposed algorithm
    Visualization results with or without dataset expansion. (a) Original images; (b) labelling; (c) without dataset expansion; (d) with dataset expansion
    Fig. 8. Visualization results with or without dataset expansion. (a) Original images; (b) labelling; (c) without dataset expansion; (d) with dataset expansion
    Segmentation results of proposed algorithm and mainstream algorithm. (a) Original images; (b) labelling; (c) U-Net++; (D) DeepLab-V3+; (e) PSPNet; (f) proposed algorithm
    Fig. 9. Segmentation results of proposed algorithm and mainstream algorithm. (a) Original images; (b) labelling; (c) U-Net++; (D) DeepLab-V3+; (e) PSPNet; (f) proposed algorithm
    Number of training samplesWith or without dataset expansionP /%R /%
    1800Without dataset expansion48.734.1
    8000With dataset expansion93.893.5
    Table 1. Effect of HRBCS model with or without dataset expansion
    AlgorithmPrecision /%Recall /%F1 score /%mIoU /%Parameter /106
    U-Net++71.070.370.775.3059.5
    DeepLab-V3+82.680.981.778.6043.5
    PSPNet95.156.971.276.0065.9
    Proposed algorithm93.893.593.685.4865.9
    Table 2. Comparison between proposed algorithm and mainstream semantic segmentation algorithms
    Liangfu Li, Biao Wu, Nan Wang. Method for Bridge Crack Detection Based on Multiresolution Network[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(12): 1210004
    Download Citation