Author Affiliations
1 Key Laboratory of Optical Calibration and Characterization, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, Anhui 230031, China2 Xi'an Institute of Surveying and Mapping, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710054, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Flow chart of multi-sensor cooperative radiometric calibration algorithm base on gray-scale tarps
Fig. 2. Layout of gray-scale tarps on-site. (a) Zhaodong; (b) Lijiang
Fig. 3. Reflectance curves of targets and typical objects. (a) Gray-scale tarps and blackland, Zhaodong, 2014-10-16; (b) gray-scale tarps and grassland, Lijiang, 2014-12-14; (c) gray-scale tarps, Lijiang, 2015-01-23; (d) color targets, Lijiang, 2015-01-23
Fig. 4. Instantaneous aerosol optical depth. (a) Zhaodong, 2014-10-16; (b) Lijiang, 2014-12-14; (c) Lijiang, 2015-01-23
Fig. 5. Relative spectral response of GFB and DGP camera
Fig. 6. Radiance relationship between GFB and DGP cameras
Fig. 7. Absolute radiometric calibration coefficient of DGP camera obtained by cooperative calibration
Fig. 8. Comparison between inversed and measured object reflectance
Site | Longitude & latitude | Altitude /m | Passed time | Surface |
---|
Zhaodong | 125.8170°E46.2167°N | 140 | 2014-10-16T13:45 | Black land covered a large and flat area | Lijiang | 100.2220°E26.9360°N | 2470 | 2014-12-14T15:062015-01-23T15:11 | Grass land covered a large and flat area |
|
Table 1. Description of sites passed by Mapping Satellite-1
Site | Date | Sun zenith /(°) | Sun azimuth /(°) | View zenith /(°) | View azimuth /(°) | AOD at 550 nm |
---|
Zhaodong | 2014-10-16 | 63.44 | 220.10 | 6 | 283.7 | 0.077 | Lijiang | 2014-12-14 | 56.96 | 211.08 | 10 | 101.2 | 0.082 | | 2015-01-23 | 52.62 | 210.33 | 0 | 0° | 0.089 |
|
Table 2. Geometrical condition and AOD at 550 nm
Channel of camera | Cooperative calibration | Site calibration | Relative difference(mid-level radiance) /% |
---|
K | B | K | B |
---|
DGP-R | 0.423 | 8.028 | 0.421 | 7.873 | 0.1 | DGP-G | 0.423 | 7.968 | 0.424 | 7.066 | 3.2 | DGP-B | 0.484 | 12.553 | 0.464 | 11.173 | 1.4 | DGP-NIR | 0.785 | 4.819 | 0.770 | 6.754 | 5.3 |
|
Table 3. Comparison between cooperative and site radiometric calibration coefficient of DGP camera
Object | Difference of R-channel | Difference of G-channel | Difference of B-channel | Difference of NIR-channel |
---|
Absolute | Relative /% | Absolute | Relative /% | Absolute | Relative /% | Absolute | Relative /% |
---|
Yellow tarp | 0.040 | 5.31 | 0.035 | 5.72 | 0.011 | 5.44 | 0.017 | 2.07 | Blue target | 0.008 | 4.39 | 0.008 | 4.18 | 0.025 | 10.86 | 0.024 | 5.97 | Green target | 0.006 | 5.44 | 0.006 | 3.05 | 0.034 | 13.75 | 0.012 | 5.79 | Orange target | 0.025 | 4.46 | 0.016 | 5.61 | 0.002 | 1.65 | 0.015 | 2.33 | Purple target | 0.004 | 1.96 | 0.009 | 5.59 | 0.019 | 9.15 | 0.021 | 5.29 | Red tarp | 0.033 | 4.61 | 0.009 | 4.80 | 0.008 | 5.02 | 0.007 | 0.91 | Grassland | 0.007 | 4.14 | 0.005 | 4.43 | 0.008 | 10.81 | 0.009 | 3.75 | Mean difference | 0.018 | 4.30 | 0.012 | 4.80 | 0.0015 | 8.10 | 0.015 | 3.70 |
|
Table 4. Difference between inversed and measured object reflectance