Fig. 1. Basic structural diagram of a close-loop FOG
Fig. 2. Principal components and mechanisms of FOG affected by temperatures
Fig. 3. Test curves of FOG under environments 1 and 2. (a) Test environment 1; (b) test environment 2
Fig. 4. Forms of Fourier transform
Fig. 5. Results of Fourier transform of FOG under environments 1 and 2. (a) Test environment 1; (b) test environment 2
Fig. 6. FOG test curves and Fourier transform results under environments 3 and 4. (a) Test curves under test environment 3; (b) test curves under test environment 4; (c) Fourier transform result under test environment 3; (d) Fourier transform result under test environment 4
Fig. 7. Test curves and Fourier transform results of pulsed FOG under environments 3 and 4. (a) Test curves under test environment 3; (b) test curves under test environment 4; (c) Fourier transform result under test environment 3; (d) Fourier transform result under test environment 4
FOG test environment | Bias stability (100 s, 1σ) /[(°)·h-1] | Random walk coefficient /[10-4 (°)·h-1/2)] |
---|
1 | 0.0014 | 2.1622 | 2 | 0.0024 | 3.0867 |
|
Table 1. Comparison of test results of FOG under environments 1 and 2
FOG test environment | Mean value | Standard deviation |
---|
1 | 3.4159 | 2.6532 | 2 | 31.7270 | 30.4750 |
|
Table 2. Comparison of mean value and standard deviation about frequency spectrum of FOG under environments 1 and 2
FOG test environment | Bias stability (100 s, 1σ) /[(°)·h-1] | Random walk coefficient /[10-4 (°)·h-1/2)] |
---|
3 | 0.0015 | 2.1565 | 4 | 0.0019 | 2.8876 |
|
Table 3. Comparison of test results of FOG under environments 3 and 4
FOG test environment | Mean value | Standard deviation |
---|
3 | 4.363 | 3.468 | 4 | 10.074 | 6.913 |
|
Table 4. Comparison of mean value and standard deviation about frequency spectrum of FOG under environments 3 and 4
FOG test environment | Bias stability /[100 s, 1σ, (°)·h-1] | Random walk coefficient /[10-4 (°)·h-1/2)] |
---|
3 | 0.0013 | 3.2654 | 4 | 0.0021 | 3.8605 |
|
Table 5. Comparison of test results of pulsed FOG under environments 3 and 4
FOG test environment | Mean value | Standard deviation |
---|
3 | 63.088 | 49.195 | 4 | 76.214 | 68.322 |
|
Table 6. Comparison of mean value and standard deviation about frequency spectrum of pulsed FOG under environments 3 and 4