• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 39, Issue 4, 0406002 (2019)
Yuanyuan Liu*, Yongbin Yang, Wenshuai Feng, and Haicheng Yu
Author Affiliations
  • Beijing Aerospace Times Optical-Electronic Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100854, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS201939.0406002 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yuanyuan Liu, Yongbin Yang, Wenshuai Feng, Haicheng Yu. Self-Assessment Technique for Fiber Optic Gyroscope Test Environment Based on Fourier Transform[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(4): 0406002 Copy Citation Text show less
    Basic structural diagram of a close-loop FOG
    Fig. 1. Basic structural diagram of a close-loop FOG
    Principal components and mechanisms of FOG affected by temperatures
    Fig. 2. Principal components and mechanisms of FOG affected by temperatures
    Test curves of FOG under environments 1 and 2. (a) Test environment 1; (b) test environment 2
    Fig. 3. Test curves of FOG under environments 1 and 2. (a) Test environment 1; (b) test environment 2
    Forms of Fourier transform
    Fig. 4. Forms of Fourier transform
    Results of Fourier transform of FOG under environments 1 and 2. (a) Test environment 1; (b) test environment 2
    Fig. 5. Results of Fourier transform of FOG under environments 1 and 2. (a) Test environment 1; (b) test environment 2
    FOG test curves and Fourier transform results under environments 3 and 4. (a) Test curves under test environment 3; (b) test curves under test environment 4; (c) Fourier transform result under test environment 3; (d) Fourier transform result under test environment 4
    Fig. 6. FOG test curves and Fourier transform results under environments 3 and 4. (a) Test curves under test environment 3; (b) test curves under test environment 4; (c) Fourier transform result under test environment 3; (d) Fourier transform result under test environment 4
    Test curves and Fourier transform results of pulsed FOG under environments 3 and 4. (a) Test curves under test environment 3; (b) test curves under test environment 4; (c) Fourier transform result under test environment 3; (d) Fourier transform result under test environment 4
    Fig. 7. Test curves and Fourier transform results of pulsed FOG under environments 3 and 4. (a) Test curves under test environment 3; (b) test curves under test environment 4; (c) Fourier transform result under test environment 3; (d) Fourier transform result under test environment 4
    FOG test environmentBias stability (100 s, 1σ) /[(°)·h-1]Random walk coefficient /[10-4 (°)·h-1/2)]
    10.00142.1622
    20.00243.0867
    Table 1. Comparison of test results of FOG under environments 1 and 2
    FOG test environmentMean valueStandard deviation
    13.41592.6532
    231.727030.4750
    Table 2. Comparison of mean value and standard deviation about frequency spectrum of FOG under environments 1 and 2
    FOG test environmentBias stability (100 s, 1σ) /[(°)·h-1]Random walk coefficient /[10-4 (°)·h-1/2)]
    30.00152.1565
    40.00192.8876
    Table 3. Comparison of test results of FOG under environments 3 and 4
    FOG test environmentMean valueStandard deviation
    34.3633.468
    410.0746.913
    Table 4. Comparison of mean value and standard deviation about frequency spectrum of FOG under environments 3 and 4
    FOG test environmentBias stability /[100 s, 1σ, (°)·h-1]Random walk coefficient /[10-4 (°)·h-1/2)]
    30.00133.2654
    40.00213.8605
    Table 5. Comparison of test results of pulsed FOG under environments 3 and 4
    FOG test environmentMean valueStandard deviation
    363.08849.195
    476.21468.322
    Table 6. Comparison of mean value and standard deviation about frequency spectrum of pulsed FOG under environments 3 and 4
    Yuanyuan Liu, Yongbin Yang, Wenshuai Feng, Haicheng Yu. Self-Assessment Technique for Fiber Optic Gyroscope Test Environment Based on Fourier Transform[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(4): 0406002
    Download Citation