Author Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Building Safety and Energy Efficiency, Ministry of Education, College of Civil Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan 410082, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Schematic of DIC method
Fig. 2. Flow chart of proposed method
Fig. 3. Schematic diagram of classical PLS algorithm
Fig. 4. Deformation test of computed-simulated speckle images. (a) A reference computed-simulated speckle image;(b) calculation result of the displacement field for homogeneous deformation in the ROI; (c) calculation result of the displacement field for inhomogeneous deformation in the ROI
Fig. 5. Comparison of root-mean-square error of strain fields calculated by three methods. (a) Homogeneous deformation; (b) inhomogeneous deformation
Fig. 6. Calculation results of strain fields of four methods under homogeneous deformation and inhomogeneous deformation. (a)(b) Classical PLS algorithm; (c)(d) proposed method-ewf; (e)(f) proposed method-pdf; (g)(h) RFE algorithm
Fig. 7. Calculation results of strain field of a plate with one hole. (a) Classical PLS algorithm; (b) proposed method-ewf; (c) proposed method-pdf; (d) RFE algorithm
Fig. 8. Comparison of strain mapped on line located in corresponding sub-image. (a) Horizontal strain; (b) shear strain; (c) vertical strain [inset: horizontal strain field, shear strain field, and vertical strain field calculated by proposed method-ewf with strain window size of 9×9(POI), from left to right]
Fig. 9. Results of vertical strain field of reinforced concrete column. (a) Vertical strain field calculated by classical PLS algorithm [strain window size: 15×15(POI)]; (b) vertical strain field calculated by proposed method-ewf [strain window size: 9×9(POI)]; (c) comparison of strain mapped on line located in corresponding sub-image of the two methods [inset: vertical strain field calculated by proposed method-ewf with strain window size of 9×9(POI)]
Window size /POI | Classical PLS algorithm /10-6 | Proposed method-ewf /10-6 | Decrease rate /% | Proposed method-pdf /10-6 | Decrease rate /% |
---|
3 | 856 | 456 | 46.73 | 600 | 29.91 | 5 | 392 | 243 | 38.01 | 291 | 25.77 | 7 | 268 | 188 | 29.85 | 215 | 19.78 | 9 | 216 | 163 | 24.54 | 182 | 15.74 | 11 | 188 | 148 | 21.28 | 162 | 13.83 | 13 | 170 | 137 | 19.41 | 149 | 12.35 | 15 | 158 | 128 | 18.99 | 140 | 11.39 | 17 | 148 | 121 | 18.24 | 132 | 10.81 | 19 | 141 | 114 | 19.15 | 125 | 11.35 | 21 | 135 | 108 | 20.00 | 119 | 11.85 |
|
Table 1. Comparison of root-mean-square error of strain fields calculated by the three methods under homogeneous deformation
Window size /POI | Classical PLS algorithm /10-6 | Proposed method-ewf /10-6 | Decrease rate /% | Proposed method-pdf /10-6 | Decrease rate /% |
---|
3 | 834 | 504 | 39.57 | 620 | 25.66 | 5 | 454 | 356 | 21.59 | 387 | 14.76 | 7 | 370 | 331 | 10.54 | 346 | 6.49 | 9 | 342 | 327 | 4.39 | 333 | 2.63 | 11 | 330 | 331 | -0.30 | 329 | 0.30 | 13 | 326 | 340 | -4.29 | 330 | -1.23 | 15 | 325 | 353 | -8.62 | 334 | -2.77 | 17 | 328 | 369 | -12.50 | 341 | -3.96 | 19 | 332 | 388 | -16.87 | 350 | -5.42 | 21 | 339 | 410 | -20.94 | 361 | -6.49 |
|
Table 2. Comparison of root-mean-square error of strain fields calculated by the three methods under inhomogeneous deformation
Test name | Deformation type | Classical PLS algorithm | Proposed method-ewf | Proposed method-pdf |
---|
Computer-speckle images | Homogeneous deformation | 5147.68 | 8614.12 | 5471.46 | Inhomogeneous deformation | 7160.32 | 12298.38 | 7242.64 | Plate with one hole | - | 7185.96 | 12090.94 | - | Reinforced concrete column | - | 6278.07 | 10728.89 | - |
|
Table 3. Computational speed of three methods unit:point/s