• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 24, 2412001 (2021)
Wenge Tu*, Zugui Huang, and Yurong Guo
Author Affiliations
  • Key Laboratory of Building Safety and Energy Efficiency, Ministry of Education, College of Civil Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan 410082, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.2412001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Wenge Tu, Zugui Huang, Yurong Guo. Pointwise Noise Suppression Algorithm Based on Redundancy Strain Information[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(24): 2412001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of DIC method
    Fig. 1. Schematic of DIC method
    Flow chart of proposed method
    Fig. 2. Flow chart of proposed method
    Schematic diagram of classical PLS algorithm
    Fig. 3. Schematic diagram of classical PLS algorithm
    Deformation test of computed-simulated speckle images. (a) A reference computed-simulated speckle image;(b) calculation result of the displacement field for homogeneous deformation in the ROI; (c) calculation result of the displacement field for inhomogeneous deformation in the ROI
    Fig. 4. Deformation test of computed-simulated speckle images. (a) A reference computed-simulated speckle image;(b) calculation result of the displacement field for homogeneous deformation in the ROI; (c) calculation result of the displacement field for inhomogeneous deformation in the ROI
    Comparison of root-mean-square error of strain fields calculated by three methods. (a) Homogeneous deformation; (b) inhomogeneous deformation
    Fig. 5. Comparison of root-mean-square error of strain fields calculated by three methods. (a) Homogeneous deformation; (b) inhomogeneous deformation
    Calculation results of strain fields of four methods under homogeneous deformation and inhomogeneous deformation. (a)(b) Classical PLS algorithm; (c)(d) proposed method-ewf; (e)(f) proposed method-pdf; (g)(h) RFE algorithm
    Fig. 6. Calculation results of strain fields of four methods under homogeneous deformation and inhomogeneous deformation. (a)(b) Classical PLS algorithm; (c)(d) proposed method-ewf; (e)(f) proposed method-pdf; (g)(h) RFE algorithm
    Calculation results of strain field of a plate with one hole. (a) Classical PLS algorithm; (b) proposed method-ewf; (c) proposed method-pdf; (d) RFE algorithm
    Fig. 7. Calculation results of strain field of a plate with one hole. (a) Classical PLS algorithm; (b) proposed method-ewf; (c) proposed method-pdf; (d) RFE algorithm
    Comparison of strain mapped on line located in corresponding sub-image. (a) Horizontal strain; (b) shear strain; (c) vertical strain [inset: horizontal strain field, shear strain field, and vertical strain field calculated by proposed method-ewf with strain window size of 9×9(POI), from left to right]
    Fig. 8. Comparison of strain mapped on line located in corresponding sub-image. (a) Horizontal strain; (b) shear strain; (c) vertical strain [inset: horizontal strain field, shear strain field, and vertical strain field calculated by proposed method-ewf with strain window size of 9×9(POI), from left to right]
    Results of vertical strain field of reinforced concrete column. (a) Vertical strain field calculated by classical PLS algorithm [strain window size: 15×15(POI)]; (b) vertical strain field calculated by proposed method-ewf [strain window size: 9×9(POI)]; (c) comparison of strain mapped on line located in corresponding sub-image of the two methods [inset: vertical strain field calculated by proposed method-ewf with strain window size of 9×9(POI)]
    Fig. 9. Results of vertical strain field of reinforced concrete column. (a) Vertical strain field calculated by classical PLS algorithm [strain window size: 15×15(POI)]; (b) vertical strain field calculated by proposed method-ewf [strain window size: 9×9(POI)]; (c) comparison of strain mapped on line located in corresponding sub-image of the two methods [inset: vertical strain field calculated by proposed method-ewf with strain window size of 9×9(POI)]
    Window size /POIClassical PLS algorithm /10-6Proposed method-ewf /10-6Decrease rate /%Proposed method-pdf /10-6Decrease rate /%
    385645646.7360029.91
    539224338.0129125.77
    726818829.8521519.78
    921616324.5418215.74
    1118814821.2816213.83
    1317013719.4114912.35
    1515812818.9914011.39
    1714812118.2413210.81
    1914111419.1512511.35
    2113510820.0011911.85
    Table 1. Comparison of root-mean-square error of strain fields calculated by the three methods under homogeneous deformation
    Window size /POIClassical PLS algorithm /10-6Proposed method-ewf /10-6Decrease rate /%Proposed method-pdf /10-6Decrease rate /%
    383450439.5762025.66
    545435621.5938714.76
    737033110.543466.49
    93423274.393332.63
    11330331-0.303290.30
    13326340-4.29330-1.23
    15325353-8.62334-2.77
    17328369-12.50341-3.96
    19332388-16.87350-5.42
    21339410-20.94361-6.49
    Table 2. Comparison of root-mean-square error of strain fields calculated by the three methods under inhomogeneous deformation
    Test nameDeformation typeClassical PLS algorithmProposed method-ewfProposed method-pdf
    Computer-speckle imagesHomogeneous deformation5147.688614.125471.46
    Inhomogeneous deformation7160.3212298.387242.64
    Plate with one hole-7185.9612090.94-
    Reinforced concrete column-6278.0710728.89-
    Table 3. Computational speed of three methods unit:point/s
    Wenge Tu, Zugui Huang, Yurong Guo. Pointwise Noise Suppression Algorithm Based on Redundancy Strain Information[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(24): 2412001
    Download Citation