• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 57, Issue 17, 171203 (2020)
Peixin Lu1, Dong Wang1、2, and Yang Li1、2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China
  • 2Henan Provincial Engineering Laboratory for Anti-Fatigue Manufacturing Technology, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP57.171203 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Peixin Lu, Dong Wang, Yang Li. Method of Measuring the Width of Stiffeners by Using Laser Ultrasonic C-Scan[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(17): 171203 Copy Citation Text show less
    Laser ultrasonic C-scan detection. (a) Detection device; (b) detection schematic
    Fig. 1. Laser ultrasonic C-scan detection. (a) Detection device; (b) detection schematic
    Experimental sample. (a) Schematic diagram of the sample; (b) sample size
    Fig. 2. Experimental sample. (a) Schematic diagram of the sample; (b) sample size
    Propagation path of laser ultrasonic
    Fig. 3. Propagation path of laser ultrasonic
    Variation curves of t with D of different ultrasonic modes
    Fig. 4. Variation curves of t with D of different ultrasonic modes
    Schematic diagram of the detection device
    Fig. 5. Schematic diagram of the detection device
    Relationship between D and ultrasonic waveform
    Fig. 6. Relationship between D and ultrasonic waveform
    Ultrasonic waveforms at different D
    Fig. 7. Ultrasonic waveforms at different D
    Results of laser ultrasonic C-scan of stiffeners with different widths. (a) d=2.0 mm; (b) d=2.5 mm; (c) d=3.0 mm; (d) d=3.5 mm; (e) d=4.0 mm
    Fig. 8. Results of laser ultrasonic C-scan of stiffeners with different widths. (a) d=2.0 mm; (b) d=2.5 mm; (c) d=3.0 mm; (d) d=3.5 mm; (e) d=4.0 mm
    Laser ultrasonic C-scan results after wavelet reduction. (a) d=2.0 mm; (b) d=2.5 mm; (c) d=3.0 mm; (d) d=3.5 mm; (e) d=4.0 mm
    Fig. 9. Laser ultrasonic C-scan results after wavelet reduction. (a) d=2.0 mm; (b) d=2.5 mm; (c) d=3.0 mm; (d) d=3.5 mm; (e) d=4.0 mm
    Laser ultrasonic C-scan results after mean filtering. (a) d=2.0 mm; (b) d=2.5 mm; (c) d=3.0 mm; (d) d=3.5 mm; (e) d=4.0 mm
    Fig. 10. Laser ultrasonic C-scan results after mean filtering. (a) d=2.0 mm; (b) d=2.5 mm; (c) d=3.0 mm; (d) d=3.5 mm; (e) d=4.0 mm
    Laser ultrasonic C-scan results after adaptive segmentation. (a) d=2.0 mm; (b) d=2.5 mm; (c) d=3.0 mm; (d) d=3.5 mm; (e) d=4.0 mm
    Fig. 11. Laser ultrasonic C-scan results after adaptive segmentation. (a) d=2.0 mm; (b) d=2.5 mm; (c) d=3.0 mm; (d) d=3.5 mm; (e) d=4.0 mm
    Actual width /mmMeasuring width /mmImage average width /mmAbsolute error /mmRelative error /%
    2.02.032.04380.01380.68
    2.52.532.5113-0.01870.73
    3.02.992.9438-0.04621.55
    3.53.523.5000-0.02000.57
    4.04.034.08000.05001.24
    Table 1. Measurement results of stiffener width
    Peixin Lu, Dong Wang, Yang Li. Method of Measuring the Width of Stiffeners by Using Laser Ultrasonic C-Scan[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(17): 171203
    Download Citation