Author Affiliations
1College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China2Engineering Research Center of Industrial Computed Tomography Nondestructive Testing, Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Diagram of blade structure
Fig. 2. Weak edge of CT image. (a) CT image of blade; (b) region of interest
Fig. 3. Flow chart of CT image measurement
Fig. 4. CT images. (a) Sample 1; (b) sample 2; (c) sample 3
Fig. 5. Comparison before and after wavelet transform. (a) Sample 1; (b) sample 2; (c) sample 3
Fig. 6. Grayscale comparison. (a) Sample 1; (b) sample 2; (c) sample 3
Fig. 7. Comparison of segmentation results
Fig. 8. Comparison of CV and RSF segmentation effects. (a)-(c) Segmentation results of CV and its local enlargement; (d)-(f) segmentation results of RSF and its local enlargement
Fig. 9. Segmentation results of RSF and CV combined wavelet transform on multi-cavity blade. (a) WT+CV; (b) WT+RSF
Fig. 10. CT image segmentation results of standard gauge blocks. (a) Original image; (b) CV; (c) WT+RSF
Sample No. | CT system | X-ray energy /kV | X-ray current /mA | Image matrix | Single pixel size /mm |
---|
1 | Linear array | 400 | 1 | 1065×1065 | 0.1390 | 2 | Linear array | 400 | 1 | 1065×1065 | 0.1390 | 3 | Planer array | 420 | 1 | 1792×1024 | 0.0650 |
|
Table 1. Parameters of experiment
Sample No. | Before wavelet transform | After wavelet transform |
---|
1 | 0.8994 | 0.9299 | 2 | 0.6718 | 0.6893 | 3 | 0.3194 | 0.4456 |
|
Table 2. Local average gradient of image
Sample No. | λ1 | λ2 | μ | ν | σ | Niter |
---|
1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1 | 0.045×255×255 | 3 | 7000 | 2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1 | 0.018×255×255 | 3 | 6500 | 3 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1 | 0.045×255×255 | 3 | 6000 |
|
Table 3. Experimental parameter setting
No. | Standard length /mm | Actual measurement length /mm | Absolute error /mm | Relative error /% |
---|
CV | WT+RSF | CV | WT+RSF | CV | WT+RSF |
---|
1 | 20 | 20.1273 | 20.0662 | 0.1273 | 0.0662 | 0.6365 | 0.3310 | 2 | 10 | 10.0803 | 10.1167 | 0.0803 | 0.1167 | 0.8030 | 1.1670 | 3 | 8 | 8.0570 | 8.0217 | 0.0570 | 0.0217 | 0.7125 | 0.2713 | 4 | 6 | 6.0394 | 6.0030 | 0.0394 | 0.0030 | 0.6567 | 0.0500 | 5 | 5 | 5.0495 | 5.0027 | 0.0495 | 0.0027 | 0.9900 | 0.0540 | 6 | 4 | 4.1158 | 3.9862 | 0.1158 | 0.0138 | 2.8950 | 0.3450 | 7 | 3 | 3.0229 | 2.9800 | 0.0229 | 0.0200 | 0.7633 | 0.6667 | 8 | 2 | 2.0215 | 1.9954 | 0.0215 | 0.0046 | 1.0750 | -0.2300 | 9 | 1 | 0.9880 | 1.0064 | 0.0120 | 0.0064 | -1.2000 | 0.6400 |
|
Table 4. Test results of standard gauge blocks