• Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis
  • Vol. 37, Issue 1, 267 (2017)
JIAO Ju1, ZHAN Xiu-chun1, ZHAI Lei1, FAN Xing-tao1, WEN Hong-li1, YUAN Ji-hai1, LIU Xiao1, and GUO Shu1、2
Author Affiliations
  • 1[in Chinese]
  • 2[in Chinese]
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2017)01-0267-06 Cite this Article
    JIAO Ju, ZHAN Xiu-chun, ZHAI Lei, FAN Xing-tao, WEN Hong-li, YUAN Ji-hai, LIU Xiao, GUO Shu. On-Site Analysis of Heavy Metals in Water with Handheld X-Ray Fluorescence and Pre-Concentration Device without External Power Supply[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2017, 37(1): 267 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    Currently, increasing importance has been attached to heavy metal pollution of water environment. In order to help geologist and environmentalist to obtain on-site experimental data, there is an urgent need to develop portable analysis techniques of water quality, which can be used to give an timely and accurate assessment of water quality of the contaminated area with low cost and to monitor water environment conveniently in daily preventing and controlling work of water pollution. Based on adsorption with Purolite S930 chelating resin at pH 4 and thin-film sample preparation technique, a rapid and simple on-site-oriented analysis method of heavy metal ions, namely Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn and Pb in aqueous solutions, was developed utilizing a handheld energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence in this paper. The correlation coefficients of the calibration curves were greater than 0.992 for all six metal ions, the lower limits of detection were between 5.8 and 18.6 μg·L-1. Precision tests carried out on multi-element mixed solutions showed that the relative standard deviations (RSD, n=10) were better than 15%. The method has been used on-site to analysis 21 water samples collected from different river or well sites near a mining area northeast China. Out of the five underground water samples, one was found contaminated by Cu and Zn (Class Ⅲ), one by Zn and Fe (Class Ⅱ), and one by Fe(in between Class Ⅱ to Ⅲ). Surface water samples showed better qualities. But two out of the sixteen were found to be contaminated by Mn heavily (Class Ⅳ). Laboratory ICPMS was used to analyze the same samples. The results for Cu, Ni and Pb were coincident with the on-site data in general. But for Zn and Mn with higher concentrations, on-site data were lower than that by ICPMS. The reason for that might be the inclusion of the fine suspending particles in the samples by ICPMS. We conclude that the on-site data were effective. With the described method, an overall data acquisition time, including sampling, processing and measuring, can be within 12 hours for a batch of 10 samples. The pre-concentration device and the XRF instrument are both small, light, portable and can operate without external power supply. So, the method is suitable for on-site water sample analysis, especially in remote areas.
    JIAO Ju, ZHAN Xiu-chun, ZHAI Lei, FAN Xing-tao, WEN Hong-li, YUAN Ji-hai, LIU Xiao, GUO Shu. On-Site Analysis of Heavy Metals in Water with Handheld X-Ray Fluorescence and Pre-Concentration Device without External Power Supply[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2017, 37(1): 267
    Download Citation