• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 40, Issue 9, 0915002 (2020)
Yufeng Wang1、2, Hongwei Wang2、3、**, Yu Liu2, Mingquan Yang2, and Jicheng Quan1、2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1University of Naval Aviation, Yantai, Shandong 264001, China
  • 2Aviation University of Air Force, Changchun, Jilin 130022, China
  • 3Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS202040.0915002 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yufeng Wang, Hongwei Wang, Yu Liu, Mingquan Yang, Jicheng Quan. Real-Time Stereo Matching Algorithm with Hierarchical Refinement[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(9): 0915002 Copy Citation Text show less
    Whole architecture of proposed algorithm
    Fig. 1. Whole architecture of proposed algorithm
    Structure of FEM
    Fig. 2. Structure of FEM
    Three DRM prototypes. (a) Prototype 1; (b) prototype 2; (c) prototype 3
    Fig. 3. Three DRM prototypes. (a) Prototype 1; (b) prototype 2; (c) prototype 3
    Structure of MBF
    Fig. 4. Structure of MBF
    Hierarchical results of proposed method. (a) Left image; (b) d^5; (c) d^4<
    Fig. 5. Hierarchical results of proposed method. (a) Left image; (b) d^5; (c) d^4<
    Visual results of proposed method. (a) Left image; (b) αF=0.000; (c) αF=0.001; (d) αF=0.010; (e) αF=0.100; (f) αF=1.000
    Fig. 6. Visual results of proposed method. (a) Left image; (b) αF=0.000; (c) αF=0.001; (d) αF=0.010; (e) αF=0.100; (f) αF=1.000
    Visual results of proposed method. (a) Left image; (b) disparity map; (c) error map; (d) local details
    Fig. 7. Visual results of proposed method. (a) Left image; (b) disparity map; (c) error map; (d) local details
    bL=2L=3L=4L=5L=6L=7
    11.68.520.826.124.023.7
    21.68.520.824.224.422.0
    31.68.320.722.723.019.9
    41.68.119.721.821.220.5
    51.68.119.521.020.620.5
    61.68.018.520.420.619.5
    Table 1. Operating rates of proposed method under different L and bframe·s-1
    ParameterL=4L=5L=6L=7
    Eep/pixel1.1081.1061.1171.180
    ED1/%4.9224.8264.7724.999
    Table 2. Performance evaluation of proposed method under different L(b=3)
    Parameterb=1b=2b=3b=4b=5b=6
    Eep/pixel1.1331.1151.1061.0971.0771.089
    ED1/%4.8704.8594.8264.6684.6364.724
    Table 3. Performance evaluation of proposed method under different b (L=5)
    Prototype of DRMFEMEep/pixelED1/%frun/(frame·s-1)
    FusionSPP
    Prototype 12.58017.02821.5
    Prototype 21.5176.75319.1
    Prototype 31.0774.63621.0
    Prototype 31.1054.70721.9
    Prototype 31.1414.92424.3
    Table 4. Performance evaluation of models with different versions (L=5,b=5)
    αFEep/pixelED1/%
    0.0000.7762.926
    0.0010.7732.879
    0.0100.7852.940
    0.1000.7582.822
    1.0000.7662.853
    Table 5. Performance evaluation of proposed method under different αF(L=5,b=5)
    MethodAllNocRuntime /s
    ED1bg /%ED1fg /%ED1all /%ED1bg /%ED1fg /%ED1all /%
    M2S_CSPN[25]1.512.881.741.402.671.610.50
    GANet-deep[26]1.483.461.811.343.111.631.80
    WSMCnetEB[23]1.724.192.131.513.571.850.39
    DeepPruner(best)[22]1.873.562.151.713.181.950.18
    PSMNet[18]1.864.622.321.714.312.140.41
    iResNet-i2[15]2.253.402.444.113.724.050.12
    CRL[14]2.483.592.672.323.122.450.47
    GC-net[17]2.216.162.872.025.582.610.90
    PBCP[10]2.588.743.612.277.713.1768.00
    SGM-Net[11]2.668.643.662.237.443.0967.00
    MC-CNN-arct[4]2.898.883.892.487.643.3367.00
    DeepPruner(fast)[22]2.323.912.592.133.432.350.06
    DispNetC[13]4.324.414.344.113.724.050.06
    MADnet[28]3.759.204.663.458.414.270.02
    Proposed2.594.802.962.224.142.540.05
    Table 6. Performance evaluation of different methods on KITTI2015 test dataset
    Yufeng Wang, Hongwei Wang, Yu Liu, Mingquan Yang, Jicheng Quan. Real-Time Stereo Matching Algorithm with Hierarchical Refinement[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(9): 0915002
    Download Citation