Author Affiliations
1School of Ocean Technology and Surveying and Mapping, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu 222000, China2Beijing Geo-Vision Tech. Co., Ltd., Beijing 100070, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Overall structure of SSW vehicle-borne laser modeling system
Fig. 2. Common manhole cover disease problems.(a) Manhole cover sinking; (b) manhole cover raised
Fig. 3. Flow chart of rapid identification and location of manhole cover and disease detection technology
Fig. 4. Schematic diagram of two-point tilt diagram
Fig. 5. Principle diagram of CSF algorithm
Fig. 6. Image binarization results of global threshold and adaptive threshold. (a) Sample image 1; (b) sample image 2
Fig. 7. Frame diagram of precise extraction of manhole cover
Fig. 8. Schematic diagram of edge curvature. (a) Round edge contour of manhole cover; (b) arc differential; (c) curvature
Fig. 9. Manhole cover extraction and marking
Fig. 10. Rigel laser scanner
Fig. 11. Experimental point cloud data. (a) Experimental data point cloud roadmap; (b) coloring map of pavement point cloud intensity
Fig. 12. Combined ground filtering. (a) Ground points; (b) non-ground points; (c) combination of ground points and non-ground points
Fig. 13. Automatic extraction of urban manhole covers based on vehicle-borne laser point cloud. (a) Original point cloud (real scene rendering); (b) ground points (intensity coloring); (c) intensity feature image; (d) manhole cover extraction result; (e) partial enlarged view
Fig. 14. Manhole cover extraction result. (a) Schematic diagram of manhole cover position 1; (b) schematic diagram of manhole cover position 2
Laser scanner name | Riegl |
---|
Point frequency /kHz | 1017 | Line frequency /Hz | 250 | Distance /m | 2--200 (reflectivity 80%) | Infinite echo | Yes | Relative measurementaccuracy /cm | ≤1 | Field of view /(°) | 360(no blind spots) | Divergence angle /marc | 0.3(spot size) |
|
Table 1. Technical indicators of Riegl laser scanner
Serialnumber | SSWX /m | SSWY /m | GPS-RTKX /m | GPS-RTKY /m | ResidualΔX /m | ResidualΔY /m |
---|
01 | 6607.935 | 26010.356 | 6607.853 | 26010.283 | 0.082 | 0.073 | 02 | 7843.534 | 21684.368 | 7843.558 | 21684.317 | -0.024 | 0.051 | 03 | 5235.368 | 15097.648 | 5235.467 | 15097.776 | -0.099 | -0.128 | 04 | 3337.800 | 15132.482 | 3337.707 | 15132.584 | 0.093 | -0.102 | 05 | 8767.534 | 16897.534 | 8767.568 | 16897.480 | -0.034 | 0.054 | 06 | 9583.426 | 13701.253 | 9583.410 | 13701.212 | 0.016 | 0.041 | 07 | 4547.686 | 14986.563 | 4547.782 | 14986.442 | -0.096 | 0.121 | 08 | 7996.326 | 26050.105 | 7996.223 | 26050.014 | 0.103 | 0.091 | 09 | 6783.348 | 15401.867 | 6783.308 | 15401.805 | 0.040 | 0.062 | 10 | 3463.865 | 13386.324 | 3463.858 | 13386.289 | 0.007 | 0.035 | 11 | 2964.757 | 25975.712 | 2964.780 | 25975.746 | -0.023 | -0.034 | 12 | 6877.865 | 15386.546 | 6877.834 | 15386.593 | 0.031 | -0.047 | 13 | 3524.698 | 14688.138 | 3524.651 | 14688.093 | 0.047 | 0.045 | 14 | 5675.861 | 14865.239 | 5675.772 | 14865.362 | 0.089 | -0.123 | 15 | 6764.165 | 25463.843 | 6764.139 | 25463.839 | 0.026 | 0.004 | 16 | 2688.535 | 14334.829 | 2688.547 | 14334.802 | -0.012 | 0.027 | 17 | 3354.879 | 15589.547 | 3354.787 | 15589.654 | 0.092 | -0.107 | 18 | 5767.234 | 23371.976 | 5767.210 | 23371.934 | 0.024 | 0.042 | 19 | 8416.587 | 13692.572 | 8416.724 | 13692.455 | -0.137 | 0.117 | 20 | 4740.108 | 13354.782 | 4740.077 | 13354.768 | 0.031 | 0.014 |
|
Table 2. Accuracy verification of manhole cover center
Serial number | SSW /mm | DS3 /mm | Residual /mm |
---|
01 | 16 | 27 | -11 | 02 | 21 | 15 | 6 | 03 | 9 | 30 | -21 | 04 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 05 | 34 | 43 | -9 | 06 | 11 | 29 | -18 | 07 | 18 | 26 | -8 | 08 | 23 | 38 | -15 | 09 | -10 | -26 | 16 | 10 | 28 | 19 | 9 | 11 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 12 | 13 | 17 | -4 | 13 | 28 | 33 | -5 | 14 | -7 | -19 | 12 | 15 | 17 | 4 | 13 | 16 | 22 | 13 | 9 | 17 | 13 | 25 | -12 | 18 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 19 | 11 | 23 | -12 | 20 | 5 | 21 | -16 | 21 | 22 | 19 | 3 | 22 | 35 | 22 | 13 | 23 | 8 | 17 | -9 | 24 | 43 | 38 | 5 | 25 | -38 | -27 | -11 | 26 | 31 | 23 | 8 | 27 | -46 | -27 | -19 | 28 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 29 | 20 | 13 | 7 | 30 | 7 | 18 | -11 | 31 | -30 | -17 | -13 | 32 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 33 | 3 | 15 | -12 | 34 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 35 | 9 | 13 | -4 |
|
Table 3. Comparison of manhole cover settlement values between SSW vehicle-borne system and DS3 level