• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 56, Issue 6, 061101 (2019)
Di Liu and Yingchun Li*
Author Affiliations
  • Department of Electronic and Optical Engineering, Space Engineering University, Beijing 101416, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP56.061101 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Di Liu, Yingchun Li. Quality Assessment of Remote Sensing Images Based on Deep Learning and Human Visual System[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2019, 56(6): 061101 Copy Citation Text show less
    Overall structure of assessment model
    Fig. 1. Overall structure of assessment model
    Single-channel assessment framework based on parallel CNN
    Fig. 2. Single-channel assessment framework based on parallel CNN
    VGG16 network structure
    Fig. 3. VGG16 network structure
    Influences of blur and noise on visual characteristics of remote sensing images. (a) Original image; (b) image with noise; (c) image with noise once more; (d) image with blur; (e) image with blur once more
    Fig. 4. Influences of blur and noise on visual characteristics of remote sensing images. (a) Original image; (b) image with noise; (c) image with noise once more; (d) image with blur; (e) image with blur once more
    Remote sensing images with different texture complexity. (a) S=9.2784; (b) S=23.1248; (c) S=19.0502; (d) S=14.9255; (e) S=20.1074; (f) S=13.2125; (g) S=23.2592; (h) S=18.7957
    Fig. 5. Remote sensing images with different texture complexity. (a) S=9.2784; (b) S=23.1248; (c) S=19.0502; (d) S=14.9255; (e) S=20.1074; (f) S=13.2125; (g) S=23.2592; (h) S=18.7957
    Remote sensing images acquired by QuickBird-2 satellite. (a) Harbor; (b) vegetation; (c) road; (d) buildings
    Fig. 6. Remote sensing images acquired by QuickBird-2 satellite. (a) Harbor; (b) vegetation; (c) road; (d) buildings
    Overall assessment results by proposed method
    Fig. 7. Overall assessment results by proposed method
    Fitting scatter plot between proposed method and SSIM, PSNR, FSIM. (a) SSIM; (b) PSNR; (c) FSIM
    Fig. 8. Fitting scatter plot between proposed method and SSIM, PSNR, FSIM. (a) SSIM; (b) PSNR; (c) FSIM
    Fitting curves of DMOS for different assessment methods in LIVEMD dataset. (a) SSIM; (b) proposed method; (c) PSNR; (d) FSIM
    Fig. 9. Fitting curves of DMOS for different assessment methods in LIVEMD dataset. (a) SSIM; (b) proposed method; (c) PSNR; (d) FSIM
    i12345
    Bblur_i54321
    Blurintensity01234
    Table 1. Blur level
    j12345
    Nnoise_j54321
    Noiseintensity01234
    Table 2. Noise level
    Five-grade scale54321
    QualityExcellentGoodFairPoorBad
    ImpairmentImperceptiblePerceptible,but not annoyingSlightlyannoyingAnnoyingVeryannoying
    Table 3. ITU-R quality and impairment scales
    MethodPLCCRMSESROCC
    SSIM0.89790.56310.8714
    PSNR0.84500.68420.7713
    FSIM0.89780.56020.8793
    Proposed0.90040.55660.8962
    Table 4. Performance comparison of different methods
    MethodPLCCRMSESROCC
    SSIM0.767911.9487-0.6953
    PSNR0.775711.7910-0.7088
    FSIM0.817810.7358-0.8642
    Proposed0.89688.2523-0.8664
    Table 5. Performance comparison of different methods in LIVEMD database
    Di Liu, Yingchun Li. Quality Assessment of Remote Sensing Images Based on Deep Learning and Human Visual System[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2019, 56(6): 061101
    Download Citation