Fig. 1. Experimental device
Fig. 2. Difference between measured and actual temperature when the emissivity is 0.3
Fig. 3. Measured object
Fig. 4. Effect of different emissivities on the measured temperature
Fig. 5. Geometric relationship between angle field w and measurement distance d
Fig. 6. Variation of emissivity
Fig. 7. Main response of the set emissivity
Fig. 8. Correction flow of the emissivity seting of infrared thermal imager
Project | Content | Wavelength/µm | 7.5−14 | Frame rate/Hz | 60 | Temperature range/℃ | −40 − +1200 | Accuracy/℃ | ±0.1 |
|
Table 1. Main technical parameters of fluke-Ti640 infrared thermal imager
Parameter | 2024Al | SiC | Thermal conductivity/(W·m−1·K−1)
| 180 | 81 | Specific heat capacity/(J·kg−1·K−1)
| 880 | 427 | Volume fraction | 55% | 45% | Density/(kg·m−3)
| 2.7×103 | 3.13×103 | Poisson ratio | 0.34 | 0.14 | Thermal expansion coefficient/K−1 | 23.6×10−6 | 4.9×10−6 |
|
Table 2. Basic properties of SiCp/Al composite
Factor | Level | α/(°)
| 0 | 45 | Ra/μm
| 0.4 | 1.8 | l/mm
| 250 | 1500 | T/℃
| 100 | 500 |
|
Table 3. Factorial experiment parameters
Factor | Level | Ra/μm
| 0.4 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.6 | l/mm
| 250 | 750 | 1250 | 1500 | T/℃
| 100 | 300 | 500 | 700 |
|
Table 4. Orthogonal experimental factors and levels
Factor | Rj | Patch | Ra/μm
| 0.1050 | 2 | l/mm
| 0.0275 | 3 | T/℃
| 0.5175 | 1 |
|
Table 5. Range analysis
Factor | Q | n | m | F | Ra/μm
| 0.235 | 3 | 6 | 4.64 | l/mm
| 0.239 | 3 | 6 | 0.32 | T/℃
| 0.058 | 3 | 6 | 112.06 |
|
Table 6. Analysis of variance
Ra/μm
| l/mm
| T/℃
| Measured value | Calculated value | Deviation | 0.4 | 250 | 200 | 0.29 | 0.282 | 2.76% | 0.4 | 250 | 400 | 0.29 | 0.283 | 2.76% | 0.4 | 250 | 700 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 1.35% |
|
Table 7. Experimental verification results
Ra/
μm
| l/
mm
| T/
℃
| Set emissivity
temperature/℃
| Formula predicted
value/℃
| Deviation | 0.4 | 250 | 200 | 200.59 | 205.08 | 2.24% | 0.4 | 250 | 400 | 403.03 | 412.43 | 2.33% | 0.4 | 250 | 700 | 707.5 | 714.26 | 0.96% |
|
Table 8. Comparison of temperature measurement results
| v/m·min−1 | l/mm
| Ra/μm
| Original setting emissivity | Original temperature
/℃
| 1 | 40 | 1000 | 0. 63 | 0.3 | 223.18 | 2 | 80 | 1000 | 0. 536 | 0.3 | 356.7 | 3 | 120 | 1000 | 0. 501 | 0.3 | 446.3 | 4 | 160 | 1000 | 0. 53 | 0.3 | 313.64 | 5 | 200 | 1000 | 0. 567 | 0.3 | 429.8 |
|
Table 9. Cutting experiment design
Setting emissivity | | Temperature /℃ | Deviation | Original | Corrected | Original | Corrected | 0.3 | 0.266445 | | 223.18 | 244.6 | 9.597634% | 0.3 | 0.262906 | 356.7 | 391.5 | 9.756098% | 0.3 | 0.2719 | 446.3 | 478.7 | 7.259691% | 0.3 | 0.266453 | 313.64 | 346.1 | 10.34945% | 0.3 | 0.267178 | 429.8 | 472.7 | 9.981387% |
|
Table 10. Comparison of cutting temperature before and after setting emissivity correction