• Infrared and Laser Engineering
  • Vol. 51, Issue 6, 20210555 (2022)
Qi Zhang, Guohe Li, Yong Sun, and Fei Sun
Author Affiliations
  • Mechanical Department, Tianjin University of Technology & Education, Tianjin 300222, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/IRLA20210555 Cite this Article
    Qi Zhang, Guohe Li, Yong Sun, Fei Sun. Experimental study on emissivity setting before precise temperature measurement of SiCp/Al cutting by infrared thermal imager[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2022, 51(6): 20210555 Copy Citation Text show less
    Experimental device
    Fig. 1. Experimental device
    Difference between measured and actual temperature when the emissivity is 0.3
    Fig. 2. Difference between measured and actual temperature when the emissivity is 0.3
    Measured object
    Fig. 3. Measured object
    Effect of different emissivities on the measured temperature
    Fig. 4. Effect of different emissivities on the measured temperature
    Geometric relationship between angle field w and measurement distance d
    Fig. 5. Geometric relationship between angle field w and measurement distance d
    Variation of emissivity
    Fig. 6. Variation of emissivity
    Main response of the set emissivity
    Fig. 7. Main response of the set emissivity
    Correction flow of the emissivity seting of infrared thermal imager
    Fig. 8. Correction flow of the emissivity seting of infrared thermal imager
    ProjectContent
    Wavelength/µm7.5−14
    Frame rate/Hz60
    Temperature range/℃−40 − +1200
    Accuracy/℃±0.1
    Table 1. Main technical parameters of fluke-Ti640 infrared thermal imager
    Parameter2024AlSiC
    Thermal conductivity/(W·m−1·K−118081
    Specific heat capacity/(J·kg−1·K−1880427
    Volume fraction55%45%
    Density/(kg·m−3) 2.7×1033.13×103
    Poisson ratio0.340.14
    Thermal expansion coefficient/K−123.6×10−64.9×10−6
    Table 2. Basic properties of SiCp/Al composite
    FactorLevel
    α/(°) 045
    Ra/μm 0.41.8
    l/mm 2501500
    T/100500
    Table 3. Factorial experiment parameters
    FactorLevel
    Ra/μm 0.40.81.21.6
    l/mm 25075012501500
    T/℃ 100300500700
    Table 4. Orthogonal experimental factors and levels
    FactorRjPatch
    Ra/μm 0.10502
    l/mm 0.02753
    T/℃ 0.51751
    Table 5. Range analysis
    FactorQnmF
    Ra/μm 0.235364.64
    l/mm 0.239360.32
    T/0.05836112.06
    Table 6. Analysis of variance
    Ra/μm l/mm T/℃ Measured valueCalculated valueDeviation
    0.42502000.290.2822.76%
    0.42504000.290.2832.76%
    0.42507000.740.731.35%
    Table 7. Experimental verification results
    Ra/ μm l/ mm T/ Set emissivity temperature/℃ Formula predicted value/℃ Deviation
    0.4250200200.59205.082.24%
    0.4250400403.03412.432.33%
    0.4250700707.5714.260.96%
    Table 8. Comparison of temperature measurement results
    v/m·min−1l/mm Ra/μm Original setting emissivityOriginal temperature /℃
    14010000. 630.3223.18
    28010000. 5360.3356.7
    312010000. 5010.3446.3
    416010000. 530.3313.64
    520010000. 5670.3429.8
    Table 9. Cutting experiment design
    Setting emissivityTemperature /℃Deviation
    OriginalCorrectedOriginalCorrected
    0.30.266445223.18244.69.597634%
    0.30.262906356.7391.59.756098%
    0.30.2719446.3478.77.259691%
    0.30.266453313.64346.110.34945%
    0.30.267178429.8472.79.981387%
    Table 10. Comparison of cutting temperature before and after setting emissivity correction
    Qi Zhang, Guohe Li, Yong Sun, Fei Sun. Experimental study on emissivity setting before precise temperature measurement of SiCp/Al cutting by infrared thermal imager[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2022, 51(6): 20210555
    Download Citation