Fusion of Domestic High Resolution Remote Sensing Images Based on the Non-Subsampled Shearlet Transform

Feifei Cheng; Zhitao Fu; Baosheng Niu; Liang Huang; Xinran Ji; Yu Sun

doi:10.3788/LOP202259.1228001

Journals >Laser & Optoelectronics Progress >Volume 59 >Issue 12 >Page 1228001 > Article

Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
Vol. 59, Issue 12, 1228001 (2022)

Fusion of Domestic High Resolution Remote Sensing Images Based on the Non-Subsampled Shearlet Transform

Feifei Cheng¹, Zhitao Fu^1、***, Baosheng Niu^1、**, Liang Huang^1、2、*, Xinran Ji¹, and Yu Sun¹

Author Affiliations

¹Faculty of Land Resource Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, Yunnan , China

²Surveying and Mapping Geo-Informatics Technology Research Center on Plateau Mountains of Yunnan Higher Education, Kunming 650093, Yunnan , China

show less

DOI: 10.3788/LOP202259.1228001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts

Feifei Cheng, Zhitao Fu, Baosheng Niu, Liang Huang, Xinran Ji, Yu Sun. Fusion of Domestic High Resolution Remote Sensing Images Based on the Non-Subsampled Shearlet Transform[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(12): 1228001 Copy Citation Text

show less

Fig. 1. Image fusion flow chart

Download full size

Fig. 2. Study area image. (a) GF-1 MS; (b) GF-1 PAN; (c) GF-2 MS; (d) GF-2 PAN; (e) GF-7 MS; (f) GF-7 PAN

Download full size

Fig. 3. Cropped GF-1 images. (a) Building; (b) plow; (c) water

Download full size

Fig. 4. GF-1 image fusion effect. (a) Brovey; (b) GS; (c) HSV; (d) COF; (e) ours

Download full size

Fig. 5. Cropped GF-2 images. (a) Building; (b) plow; (c) water

Download full size

Fig. 6. GF-2 image fusion effect. (a) Brovey; (b) GS; (c) HSV; (d) COF; (e) ours

Download full size

Fig. 7. Cropped GF-7 images. (a) Building; (b) plow; (c) water

Download full size

Fig. 8. GF-7 image fusion effect. (a) Brovey; (b) GS; (c) HSV; (d) COF; (e) ours

Download full size

Experimental data	Acquisition time	Revisit period /d	Spatial resolution		Crop image block size /pixel×pixel
Experimental data	Acquisition time	Revisit period /d	Multispectral image /m	Panchromatic image /m	Crop image block size /pixel×pixel
GF-1	2015-10-24	4	8.0	2.00	256×256
GF-2	2017-01-19	5	3.2	0.80	512×512
GF-7	2020-09-07	/	2.6	0.65	512×512

Table 1. Study area image information

Image source	Image fusion method	Evaluation index
Image source	Image fusion method	SAM↓	MI↑	SSIM↑	Q^AB/F↑	ERGAS↓	PSNR↑	CC↑	VIFF↑
GF-1	Brovey	7.7366	1.7376	0.4086	0.1485	94.2994	35.5118	0.5537	0.2613
	GS	2.5964	4.1207	0.8126	0.4696	69.2078	41.6688	0.8139	0.1873
	HSV	4.1977	1.5296	0.3044	0.1187	158.7498	24.4165	0.3291	0.0568
	COF	0.2014	3.3265	0.6823	0.3524	63.5375	47.5872	0.8113	0.4694
	Ours	0.1891	3.0287	0.9055	0.7053	66.2150	45.8573	0.8413	0.6572

Table 2. Objective evaluation index of GF-1 image fusion

Image source	Image fusion method	Evaluation index
Image source	Image fusion method	SAM↓	MI↑	SSIM↑	Q^AB/F↑	ERGAS↓	PSNR↑	CC↑	VIFF↑
GF-2	Brovey	0.3621	2.0939	0.5496	0.2211	55.0622	51.6353	0.7499	0.3367
	GS	2.0431	2.1633	0.6585	0.2539	59.5750	49.9990	0.7280	0.2809
	HSV	0.7273	2.1734	0.4916	0.2150	144.4246	31.7399	0.7217	0.6638
	COF	0.1705	3.4190	0.7589	0.4534	49.2401	54.7475	0.8780	0.6086
	Ours	0.1782	3.0032	0.8794	0.7057	46.0542	57.0434	0.8891	0.7322

Table 3. Objective evaluation index of GF-2 image fusion

Image source	Image fusion method	Evaluation index
Image source	Image fusion method	SAM↓	MI↑	SSIM↑	Q^AB/F↑	ERGAS↓	PSNR↑	CC↑	VIFF↑
GF-7	Brovey	19.4542	5.2579	0.8435	0.6329	209.0275	30.1183	0.8282	0.7483
	GS	12.9954	4.7994	0.7807	0.5430	165.9524	31.9917	0.8269	0.4080
	HSV	9.7949	3.4614	0.5719	0.3204	379.6045	17.6740	0.7719	1.1922
	COF	0.2740	3.7737	0.6904	0.4129	81.2305	54.4365	0.8144	0.6450
	Ours	0.3500	3.6462	0.9027	0.6123	109.4364	47.5092	0.8770	0.6966

Table 4. Objective evaluation index of GF-7 image fusion

Download Citation

Set citation alerts for the article

Tools

Set citation alerts for the article

Save the article for my favorites

Paper Information