• Chinese Optics Letters
  • Vol. 22, Issue 9, 091202 (2024)
Feixia Huang1, Bowen Gu2, Qiang Wu1,3,**, Hong Yang1..., Yingying Hu1, Juan Liu1, Yue Fu1, Xing-Dao He1, Haimeng Wu3, Jing Jiang3, Ghanim Putrus3, Zabih Ghassemlooy3, Jinhui Yuan4 and Bin Liu1,*|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Nondestructive Test (Ministry of Education), Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang 330063, China
  • 2School of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
  • 3Faculty of Engineering and Environment, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK
  • 4State Key Laboratory of Information Photonics and Optical Communications, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/COL202422.091202 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Feixia Huang, Bowen Gu, Qiang Wu, Hong Yang, Yingying Hu, Juan Liu, Yue Fu, Xing-Dao He, Haimeng Wu, Jing Jiang, Ghanim Putrus, Zabih Ghassemlooy, Jinhui Yuan, Bin Liu, "Real-time monitoring of internal temperature of a lithium-ion battery using embedded fiber Bragg gratings," Chin. Opt. Lett. 22, 091202 (2024) Copy Citation Text show less
    FBG array layout and spectrum. (a) A schematic diagram; (b) a layout inside and outside the battery; (c) glass encapsulated; and (d) spectrum of the FBG array.
    Fig. 1. FBG array layout and spectrum. (a) A schematic diagram; (b) a layout inside and outside the battery; (c) glass encapsulated; and (d) spectrum of the FBG array.
    FBG temperature sensitivity in the temperature range of 20°C–60°C.
    Fig. 2. FBG temperature sensitivity in the temperature range of 20°C–60°C.
    Battery simulation. (a) A geometry model used in the simulation. (b) Temperature distribution of the battery—a cross-section view.
    Fig. 3. Battery simulation. (a) A geometry model used in the simulation. (b) Temperature distribution of the battery—a cross-section view.
    Changes in the temperature and temperature rate of the inner and outer surfaces of batteries under three different charging and discharging rates: (a)–(d) Voltage current, internal and external temperature and temperature rate change and difference between internal and external temperature changes at charging and discharging rate of 0.5C; (e)–(h) voltage current, internal and external temperature and temperature rate change and difference between internal and external temperature changes at charging and discharging rate of 1C; (i)–(l) voltage current, internal and external temperature and temperature rate change and difference between temperature and external temperature changes at charging and discharging rate of 1.25C.
    Fig. 4. Changes in the temperature and temperature rate of the inner and outer surfaces of batteries under three different charging and discharging rates: (a)–(d) Voltage current, internal and external temperature and temperature rate change and difference between internal and external temperature changes at charging and discharging rate of 0.5C; (e)–(h) voltage current, internal and external temperature and temperature rate change and difference between internal and external temperature changes at charging and discharging rate of 1C; (i)–(l) voltage current, internal and external temperature and temperature rate change and difference between temperature and external temperature changes at charging and discharging rate of 1.25C.
    Comparison of the measured and simulated internal temperatures when the battery is charged and discharged in the second cycle at 0.5C.
    Fig. 5. Comparison of the measured and simulated internal temperatures when the battery is charged and discharged in the second cycle at 0.5C.
    Capacity test with the FBG array inserted and no FBG array inserted in the battery. (a) Capacity and voltage changes. (b) Localized amplification of voltage changes during a single charging and discharging cycle.
    Fig. 6. Capacity test with the FBG array inserted and no FBG array inserted in the battery. (a) Capacity and voltage changes. (b) Localized amplification of voltage changes during a single charging and discharging cycle.
    Changes of internal and external temperature during battery charging and discharging: (a), (b) Voltage current and difference between internal and external temperature changes at charging and discharging rate of 0.5C; (c), (d) voltage current and difference between internal and external temperature changes at charging and discharging rate of 1C; (e), (f) Voltage current and difference between internal and external temperature changes at charging and discharging rate of 1.25C.
    Fig. 7. Changes of internal and external temperature during battery charging and discharging: (a), (b) Voltage current and difference between internal and external temperature changes at charging and discharging rate of 0.5C; (c), (d) voltage current and difference between internal and external temperature changes at charging and discharging rate of 1C; (e), (f) Voltage current and difference between internal and external temperature changes at charging and discharging rate of 1.25C.
    Battery state change at 2C charging and discharging rate. (a) Voltage and current change; (b) internal and external temperature change; (c) difference between internal and external temperature changes.
    Fig. 8. Battery state change at 2C charging and discharging rate. (a) Voltage and current change; (b) internal and external temperature change; (c) difference between internal and external temperature changes.
    SensorIFBG1IFBG2IFBG3IFBG4EFBG1EFBG2EFBG3EFBG4
    Wavelength (nm)1529.891540.131549.951559.951529.461540.361549.851559.92
    Sensitivity (pm/°C)10.6310.3810.1710.5010.7310.239.6910.02
    Table 1. Center Wavelengths and Sensitivities of FBGs
    Test procedureVoltage/currentCut-off voltage/current
    1700 mA (0.5C)4.2 V
    CC charging3400 mA (1C)4.2 V
    4250 mA (1.25C)4.2 V
    CV charging4.2 V1000 mA
    CC discharging1700 mA (0.5C)2.7 V
    3400 mA (1C)2.7 V
    4250 mA (1.25C)2.7 V
    Rest time30 min
    Repeated the above process (three times)
    Table 2. Battery Charging and Discharging Test Procedure
    MaterialIsotropic thermal conductivity (W/(m · K))Material density (kg/m3)
    Cu3868933
    Electrolyte0.21240
    Structure steel457850
    Table 3. Material Properties
    SOC10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%
    Discharging (mV/K)1 × 10−52 × 10−51.5 × 10−42.5 × 10−43 × 10−41.7 × 10−45 × 10−56 × 10−5
    Charging (mV/K)−2.1 × 10−4−2 × 10−4−5 × 10−5−3 × 10−5−1 × 10−53.2 × 10−41.1 × 10−46 × 10−5
    Table 4. Entropy Values Based on Different SOCs
    Feixia Huang, Bowen Gu, Qiang Wu, Hong Yang, Yingying Hu, Juan Liu, Yue Fu, Xing-Dao He, Haimeng Wu, Jing Jiang, Ghanim Putrus, Zabih Ghassemlooy, Jinhui Yuan, Bin Liu, "Real-time monitoring of internal temperature of a lithium-ion battery using embedded fiber Bragg gratings," Chin. Opt. Lett. 22, 091202 (2024)
    Download Citation