Zechao Jiang, Xiuyuan Yang, Mengmeng Wu, Xingkun Man. The drying of liquid droplets[J]. Chinese Physics B, 2020, 29(9):

Search by keywords or author
- Chinese Physics B
- Vol. 29, Issue 9, (2020)

Fig. 1. Schematic of a sessile droplet drying on a substrate. Panels (a) and (b) are the top and the side views of the droplet, respectively. Relevant parameters are the radius of the contact line r , the radius of the spherical crown R , the contact angle θ , the height of the droplet h at position x .

Fig. 2. Evolution of the contact line r /r 0 of drying droplets for three values of initial contact angles, θ 0 = 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6. The time is in units of τ re. The fitting tangent slopes k in the later evaporation processes confirm the Tanner’s law. For all calculations, θ e = 0, k cl = 0 and k ev = 0.

Fig. 3. Droplet shape evolution for evaporation on frictionless substrate for three situations: (a) θ 0 < θ e, (b) θ 0 = θ e, and (c) θ 0 > θ e. The corresponding evolution of the contact line r /r 0 is shown in panel (d), and the contact angle θ is shown in panel (e). For all calculations, θ e = 0.8 and k ev = 0.001.

Fig. 4. Evolution of (a) contact radius r /r 0 and (b) contact angle θ of a drying droplet for various evaporation rates k ev. By increasing the evaporation rate, the evolution mode changes from CCA to a continuously decreasing one. For all cases, the initial contact angle θ 0 of the droplet is the same as its equilibrium contact angle θ e, and k cl is fixed as k cl = 0.

Fig. 5. The comparison of the evolution of r calculated from the simple model and the full Onsager model. The results are in good agreement. The parameters are: θ 0 = θ e = 0.4, k ev = 1, k cl = 0.

Fig. 6. Droplet shape evolution on frictional substrate. Panel (a) is for pinned contact line motion with k cl = 1000. Panel (b) is the corresponding evolution of r /r 0 and θ . Panel (c) is the shape evolution for small k cl = 25, and its corresponding evolution of r /r 0 and θ is shown in panel (d). The calculation parameters for panels (a) and (b) are θ 0 = 0.8, θ e = 0.2, and k ev = 0.01, while for panels (c) and (d), θ 0 = 1.2, θ e = 0.6, and k ev = 0.5.

Fig. 7. The comparison of θ evolution between the reduced model and the Onsager full model when the contact line is pinned, r ˙ = 0 . The calculation parameters are: θ 0 = 1.0, θ e = 0, k ev = 1, k cl = 1000.
Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address