• Chinese Physics B
  • Vol. 29, Issue 9, (2020)
Zechao Jiang1、2, Xiuyuan Yang1、2, Mengmeng Wu1、2, and Xingkun Man1、2、†
Author Affiliations
  • 1Center of Soft Matter Physics and Its Applications, Beihang University, Beijing 009, China
  • 2School of Physics, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/ab8ac7 Cite this Article
    Zechao Jiang, Xiuyuan Yang, Mengmeng Wu, Xingkun Man. The drying of liquid droplets[J]. Chinese Physics B, 2020, 29(9): Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of a sessile droplet drying on a substrate. Panels (a) and (b) are the top and the side views of the droplet, respectively. Relevant parameters are the radius of the contact line r, the radius of the spherical crown R, the contact angle θ, the height of the droplet h at position x.
    Fig. 1. Schematic of a sessile droplet drying on a substrate. Panels (a) and (b) are the top and the side views of the droplet, respectively. Relevant parameters are the radius of the contact line r, the radius of the spherical crown R, the contact angle θ, the height of the droplet h at position x.
    Evolution of the contact line r/r0 of drying droplets for three values of initial contact angles, θ0 = 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6. The time is in units of τre. The fitting tangent slopes k in the later evaporation processes confirm the Tanner’s law. For all calculations, θe = 0, kcl = 0 and kev = 0.
    Fig. 2. Evolution of the contact line r/r0 of drying droplets for three values of initial contact angles, θ0 = 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6. The time is in units of τre. The fitting tangent slopes k in the later evaporation processes confirm the Tanner’s law. For all calculations, θe = 0, kcl = 0 and kev = 0.
    Droplet shape evolution for evaporation on frictionless substrate for three situations: (a) θ0 θe, (b) θ0 = θe, and (c) θ0 > θe. The corresponding evolution of the contact line r/r0 is shown in panel (d), and the contact angle θ is shown in panel (e). For all calculations, θe = 0.8 and kev = 0.001.
    Fig. 3. Droplet shape evolution for evaporation on frictionless substrate for three situations: (a) θ0 < θe, (b) θ0 = θe, and (c) θ0 > θe. The corresponding evolution of the contact line r/r0 is shown in panel (d), and the contact angle θ is shown in panel (e). For all calculations, θe = 0.8 and kev = 0.001.
    Evolution of (a) contact radius r/r0 and (b) contact angle θ of a drying droplet for various evaporation rates kev. By increasing the evaporation rate, the evolution mode changes from CCA to a continuously decreasing one. For all cases, the initial contact angle θ0 of the droplet is the same as its equilibrium contact angle θe, and kcl is fixed as kcl = 0.
    Fig. 4. Evolution of (a) contact radius r/r0 and (b) contact angle θ of a drying droplet for various evaporation rates kev. By increasing the evaporation rate, the evolution mode changes from CCA to a continuously decreasing one. For all cases, the initial contact angle θ0 of the droplet is the same as its equilibrium contact angle θe, and kcl is fixed as kcl = 0.
    The comparison of the evolution of r calculated from the simple model and the full Onsager model. The results are in good agreement. The parameters are: θ0 = θe = 0.4, kev = 1, kcl = 0.
    Fig. 5. The comparison of the evolution of r calculated from the simple model and the full Onsager model. The results are in good agreement. The parameters are: θ0 = θe = 0.4, kev = 1, kcl = 0.
    Droplet shape evolution on frictional substrate. Panel (a) is for pinned contact line motion with kcl = 1000. Panel (b) is the corresponding evolution of r/r0 and θ. Panel (c) is the shape evolution for small kcl = 25, and its corresponding evolution of r/r0 and θ is shown in panel (d). The calculation parameters for panels (a) and (b) are θ0 = 0.8, θe = 0.2, and kev = 0.01, while for panels (c) and (d), θ0 = 1.2, θe = 0.6, and kev = 0.5.
    Fig. 6. Droplet shape evolution on frictional substrate. Panel (a) is for pinned contact line motion with kcl = 1000. Panel (b) is the corresponding evolution of r/r0 and θ. Panel (c) is the shape evolution for small kcl = 25, and its corresponding evolution of r/r0 and θ is shown in panel (d). The calculation parameters for panels (a) and (b) are θ0 = 0.8, θe = 0.2, and kev = 0.01, while for panels (c) and (d), θ0 = 1.2, θe = 0.6, and kev = 0.5.
    The comparison of θ evolution between the reduced model and the Onsager full model when the contact line is pinned, r˙=0. The calculation parameters are: θ0 = 1.0, θe = 0, kev = 1, kcl = 1000.
    Fig. 7. The comparison of θ evolution between the reduced model and the Onsager full model when the contact line is pinned, r˙=0. The calculation parameters are: θ0 = 1.0, θe = 0, kev = 1, kcl = 1000.
    Zechao Jiang, Xiuyuan Yang, Mengmeng Wu, Xingkun Man. The drying of liquid droplets[J]. Chinese Physics B, 2020, 29(9):
    Download Citation