Author Affiliations
1School of Mechanical Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013, China2Faculty of Science, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Tongue image segmentation
Fig. 2. Simulation diagrams of the superposition of tongue image positive and negative films. (a) Light red; (b) light white; (c) red; (d) twilight; (e) cyan-blue; (f) purple
Fig. 3. Difference of synthetic film simulation parameters L*, a*, and b*
Fig. 4. Experimental results of superposition of tongue image positive and negative films. (a) Light red; (b) light white; (c) red; (d) twilight; (e) cyan-blue; (f) purple
Fig. 5. Scatter plot of chromatographic spatial distribution. (a) Light red; (b) light white; (c) red; (d) twilight; (e) cyan-blue; (f) purple
Fig. 6. Scatter plot for tongue color classification of synthetic films
Fig. 7. Parameter L* line of tongue image synthetic film
Physique | Chroma value | Light red(±s) | Light white(±s) | Red/twilight(±s) | Cyan-blue/purple(±s) |
---|
Peace quality | L* | 55.91±1.46 | 64.02±4.26 | 49.13±2.07 | 42.67±5.46 | a* | 37.39±2.66 | 29.54±2.37 | 45.60±1.70 | 31.07±2.77 | b* | 18.93±2.45 | 14.06±2.06 | 21.51±2.05 | 8.56±2.26 | Sputumwet quality | L* | 57.55±1.97 | 59.99±1.77 | 48.55±2.47 | 44.62±2.58 | a* | 36.47±2.01 | 27.61±2.79 | 44.00±2.99 | 29.92±3.37 | b* | 17.51±3.11 | 10.92±1.70 | 20.76±2.53 | 6.87±3.61 | Wet heatquality | L* | 56.87±1.79 | 60.35±2.06 | 48.64±5.29 | 46.37±5.96 | a* | 35.90±2.35 | 25.20±3.83 | 42.85±3.85 | 30.21±2.63 | b* | 18.94±2.20 | 10.76±2.52 | 20.58±2.43 | 6.19±1.87 | Yin deficiencyquality | L* | 56.01±1.36 | 61.51±2.16 | 49.75±2.89 | 46.16±3.48 | a* | 39.02±2.90 | 28.00±4.05 | 45.48±2.50 | 30.16±1.08 | b* | 18.44±2.11 | 12.28±2.23 | 21.98±2.18 | 7.39±1.48 |
|
Table 1. Relationship between tongue chroma value and physique
Tongue color | L* | a* | b* |
---|
Light red | [50, 58] | [-2, 2] | [-1, 1] | Light white | [33, 44] | [14, 28] | [-9, 14] | Red | [68, 72] | [-26, -20] | [-21, -5] | Twilight | [69, 75] | [-25, -18] | [-16, -4] | Cyan-blue | [52, 60] | [61, 72] | [21, 50] | Purple | [73, 82] | [-19, -6] | [16, 34] |
|
Table 2. Simulation parameter range of synthetic films
Tongue color | L* | a* | b* |
---|
Light red | [50, 57] | [-2, 11] | [-8, 2] | Light white | [45, 49] | [3, 19] | [-18, -2] | Red | [59, 67] | [-3, 11] | [-17, -3] | Twilight | [62, 70] | [-3, 9] | [-15, -2] | Cyan-blue | [53, 59] | [3, 16] | [-16, 3] | Purple | [76, 83] | [-1, 11] | [-16, 4] |
|
Table 3. Experimental parameter range of synthetic films
Tongue color | Internal organ | Fitting equation |
---|
Light red | Normal | q=-0.05753o2-0.1177op+6.785o-0.07655p2+7.28p-205 | Light white | Kidney | q=0.04205o2+0.06796op-4.7o-0.006757p2-3.011p+118.2 | Red | Heart | q=-0.009147o2+0.03776op+1.084o-0.009451p2-2.461p-41.55 | Twilight | Stomach | q=-0.01078o2+0.01269op+1.287o+0.01275p2-1.112p-47.06 | Cyan-blue | Lung | q=0.05644o2+0.09939op-7.252o-0.08967p2-3.703p+215.3 | Purple | Heart | q=0.005532o2-0.007552op-1.026o+0.008415p2+0.5093p+39.53 |
|
Table 4. Summary of fitting equations for tongue image synthetic films
Tongue color | Simulation data | Experimental data |
---|
Light red | [47, 55] | [50, 55] | Light white | [33, 47] | [45, 50] | Red | [64, 70] | [59, 65] | Twilight | [70, 74] | [65, 73] | Cyan-blue | [55, 64] | [55, 59] | Purple | [74, 82] | [73, 83] |
|
Table 5. Comparison of quantitative parameter L* between simulation and experiment