• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 20, 2011004 (2021)
Fen Wu1, Li Peng1、2、**, Peng Han1、2, Kaiqing Luo1、2, Dongmei Liu1、2, and Jian Qiu1、2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center for Optoelectronic Instrument, School of Physics and Telecommunication Engineering, South China Normal University,Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006, China
  • 2Qingyuan Institute of Science and Technology Innovation, South China Normal University , Qingyuan, Guangdong 511517, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.2011004 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Fen Wu, Li Peng, Peng Han, Kaiqing Luo, Dongmei Liu, Jian Qiu. Research on Non-Contact Heart Rate Measurement Method Based on Self-Optimizing Normalized Least Mean Square Algorithm[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(20): 2011004 Copy Citation Text show less
    Flow chart of heart rate measurement using IPPG method
    Fig. 1. Flow chart of heart rate measurement using IPPG method
    Time domain signal. (a) Original pulse wave; (b) background signal
    Fig. 2. Time domain signal. (a) Original pulse wave; (b) background signal
    Schematic diagram of proposed experimental device
    Fig. 3. Schematic diagram of proposed experimental device
    Bland-Altman analysis of actual heart rate values and self-optimizing measured heart rate values under different light conditions
    Fig. 4. Bland-Altman analysis of actual heart rate values and self-optimizing measured heart rate values under different light conditions
    Control factor μCondition 1Condition 2Condition 3
    M1M2M3M1M2M3M1M2M3
    μ=1.8-13-411-3-1915-14
    μ=1.401-310-3-1715-17
    μ=1.021-1-52-11-211-8
    μ=0.6-73-1-115-1634-5
    μ=0.2-64-2-138-1514-3
    Table 1. Heart rate measurement error under different conditions unit: bit·min-1
    Heart rate resultsME /(bit·min-1)MAPE /%Pearson correlation coefficient r
    Light 1Light 2Light 3Light 1Light 2Light 3Light 1Light 2Light 3
    Method 1--0.5010.5313.642.2314.7718.690.780.480.26
    Method 2μ=1.80.480.971.552.022.202.960.780.670.61
    μ=1.40.510.971.982.192.203.240.770.670.59
    μ=1.00.451.032.601.932.123.150.790.690.57
    μ=0.60.450.972.231.932.203.360.790.660.56
    μ=0.20.420.612.591.822.123.650.800.670.57
    Method 3μso0.300.601.221.691.732.080.820.780.70
    Table 2. Heart rate results under different measurement methods
    TesterActual heart rateOriginal measured heart rateSelf-optimizing measured heart rate
    Light 1Light 2Light 3Light 1Light 2Light 3Light 1Light 2Light 3
    Tester 1666467657060656465
    Tester 2717173686565717269
    Tester 3767675756871757876
    Tester 4676768686064686769
    Tester 5696868666455696865
    Tester 6828183827868828285
    Tester 7717170717660717370
    Tester 8807883797465817980
    Table 3. Average heart rate of different testers under different light conditions unit: bit·min-1
    Fen Wu, Li Peng, Peng Han, Kaiqing Luo, Dongmei Liu, Jian Qiu. Research on Non-Contact Heart Rate Measurement Method Based on Self-Optimizing Normalized Least Mean Square Algorithm[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(20): 2011004
    Download Citation