• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 39, Issue 6, 0612003 (2019)
Dongxiao Ma*, Jiachun Wang, Zongsheng Chen, Bing Wang, and Yang Liu
Author Affiliations
  • State Key Laboratory of Pulsed Power Laser Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Hefei, Anhui 230037, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS201939.0612003 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Dongxiao Ma, Jiachun Wang, Zongsheng Chen, Bing Wang, Yang Liu. Simplified Calibration Method for Radiation Temperature Measurement System with Wide Dynamic Range[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(6): 0612003 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of radiation sources
    Fig. 1. Schematic of radiation sources
    Flow chart of simplified calibration method
    Fig. 2. Flow chart of simplified calibration method
    Schematic of calibration system
    Fig. 3. Schematic of calibration system
    Experimental image and spectral response parameters of detector. (a) Calibration image; (b) relative spectral response
    Fig. 4. Experimental image and spectral response parameters of detector. (a) Calibration image; (b) relative spectral response
    Error between actual and theoretical calculation values. (a) Attenuator with transmittance of 0.0740%; (b) attenuator with transmittance of 0.8193%
    Fig. 5. Error between actual and theoretical calculation values. (a) Attenuator with transmittance of 0.0740%; (b) attenuator with transmittance of 0.8193%
    Relative errors of inversion temperature and radiance of calibration models for different attenuators. (a) 0.8 ms; (b) 1 ms; (c) radiance (τf=0.0740%); (d) temperature (τf=0.0740%); (e) radiance(τf=0.8193%); (f) temperature (τf=0. 0.8193%)
    Fig. 6. Relative errors of inversion temperature and radiance of calibration models for different attenuators. (a) 0.8 ms; (b) 1 ms; (c) radiance (τf=0.0740%); (d) temperature (τf=0.0740%); (e) radiance(τf=0.8193%); (f) temperature (τf=0. 0.8193%)
    Gray valueRelative error /%(gray value)Inversion radiance L /(W·m-2·Sr-1)Relative error of inversion radiance /%Inversion temperature T /℃Relative error of inversion temperature /%
    923.28-1.41259.22-2.21302.11-0.70
    1288.62-3.25426.72-4.49355.61-1.60
    1773.38-4.50649.10-5.76408.52-2.13
    2385.87-4.38919.45-5.30459.34-2.07
    3130.61-4.491251.02-5.24510.71-2.14
    4008.92-4.151634.27-4.71561.19-2.03
    5019.64-3.892074.93-4.32611.80-1.97
    6159.72-3.412563.92-3.72661.76-1.81
    7424.77-3.023105.85-3.26711.83-1.69
    Table 1. 2 Inversion results and relative error of calibration model at integration time of 0.2 ms after placing attenuator with transmittance of 0.8193%
    Gray valueL(0.8 ms) /(W·m-2·Sr-1)T(0.8 ms) /℃L(1 ms) /(W·m-2·Sr-1)T(1 ms) /℃
    0.8 ms1 ms
    1499.721847.79607.51398.65612.36399.70
    1990.442461.211199.81501.611204.73502.32
    2673.443314.982008.67602.162013.38602.67
    3543.044402.003034.78702.403038.53702.73
    4585.585705.204238.37800.694244.03801.12
    5784.067203.345610.39898.455614.45898.72
    Table 1. 0 Inversion results of calibration model at different integration time after placing attenuator with transmittance of 0.0740%
    Temperature /Lb /(W·m-2·Sr-1)Relative error of inversion radiance /%Relative error of inversion temperature /%
    0.8 ms1.0 ms0.8 ms1.0 ms
    400613.741.010.220.340.07
    5001188.69-0.94-1.35-0.32-0.46
    6001988.92-0.99-1.23-0.36-0.45
    7003007.78-0.90-1.02-0.34-0.39
    8004229.26-0.22-0.35-0.09-0.14
    9005633.460.410.340.170.14
    Table 1. 1 Relative error of inversion radiance and inversion temperature
    Temperature /Lb /(W·m-2·Sr-1)GN(0.8 ms)GN(1 ms)
    300253.611045.781281.57
    400613.741169.131436.49
    5001188.691359.491673.39
    6001988.921621.322001.71
    7003007.781949.872413.85
    8004229.262335.992865.68
    9005633.462781.383450.40
    10007199.813277.954072.91
    Table 1. Gray value responses of attenuator with transmittance of 0.0278% at different integration time
    Temperature /℃Integration time /msFitting equationR-square
    From 300 ℃ to 1000℃ with a gradient of 100 ℃0.8GN=0.3207Lb+975.90.9999
    1.0GN=0.4001Lb+11930.9999
    Table 2. Fitting model of attenuator with transmission of 0.0278% at different integration time
    Integration time /msA1tint1 /mstint2 /mstint2/tint1τf2/τf1A2Average value
    0.80.32070.80.81.002.6640.85430.8535
    0.40011.00.80.802.6640.8527
    1.00.32070.81.01.252.6641.06791.0669
    0.40011.01.01.002.6641.0659
    Table 3. Linear coefficients of calibration model for attenuator with transmittance of 0.0740% at integration time of 0.8 ms and 1.0 ms
    Integration time /msA1tint1 /mstint2 /mstint2/tint1τf2/τf1A2Averagevalue
    0.20.32070.80.20.2529.4722.36292.3606
    0.40011.00.20.2029.4722.3583
    Table 4. Linear coefficients of calibration model for attenuator with transmittance of 0.8193% at integration time of 0.2 ms
    Integration time /msFitting equation
    0.8GN=0.8535Lb+975.9
    1.0GN=1.0669Lb+1193
    Table 5. Fitting model of attenuator with transmittance of 0.074% at different integration time
    Integration time /msFitting equationSaturated radiance /(W·m-2·Sr-1)Saturated temperature /℃
    0.8GN=0.8535Lb+975.910807.381203.42
    1.0GN=1.0669Lb+11938442.221073.45
    Table 6. Theoretical temperature measurement limit of calibration model for attenuator with transmittance of 0.0740%
    Integration time /msFitting equationSaturated radiance /(W·m-2·Sr-1)Saturated temperature /℃
    0.2GN=2.3606Lb+324.64183.43796.51
    Table 7. Theoretical temperature measurement limit of calibration model for attenuator with transmittance of 0.8193%
    Temperature /Lb /(W·m-2·Sr-1)GN(0.8 ms)GN(1 ms)
    400613.741494.411846.33
    5001188.691999.942478.33
    6001988.922690.303041.07
    7003007.783566.084434.81
    8004229.264593.355720.96
    9005633.465764.377183.06
    Table 8. Gray value responses of attenuator with transmittance of 0.0740% at different integration time
    Temperature /℃Lb /(W·m-2·Sr-1)GN(0.2 ms)
    300253.61936.50
    350408.381331.93
    400613.741856.87
    450873.202495.05
    5001188.693277.75
    5501560.764182.47
    6001988.925222.68
    6502471.886376.99
    7003007.787656.27
    Table 9. Gray value responses of attenuator with transmittance of 0.8193% at integration time of 0.2 ms
    Dongxiao Ma, Jiachun Wang, Zongsheng Chen, Bing Wang, Yang Liu. Simplified Calibration Method for Radiation Temperature Measurement System with Wide Dynamic Range[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(6): 0612003
    Download Citation