• Matter and Radiation at Extremes
  • Vol. 7, Issue 1, 018201 (2022)
Haonan Sui1,2, Long Yu1, Wenbin Liu1, Ying Liu1..., Yangyang Cheng1 and Huiling Duan1,2,a)|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory for Turbulence and Complex System, Department of Mechanics and Engineering Science, BIC-ESAT, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People’s Republic of China
  • 2CAPT, HEDPS and IFSA, Collaborative Innovation Center of MoE, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People’s Republic of China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1063/5.0064557 Cite this Article
    Haonan Sui, Long Yu, Wenbin Liu, Ying Liu, Yangyang Cheng, Huiling Duan. Theoretical models of void nucleation and growth for ductile metals under dynamic loading: A review[J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2022, 7(1): 018201 Copy Citation Text show less
    Nucleation occurs at the matrix–particle interface owing to tensile stress.24
    Fig. 1. Nucleation occurs at the matrix–particle interface owing to tensile stress.24
    Critical strain of void nucleation at particles.27–31
    Fig. 2. Critical strain of void nucleation at particles.27–31
    Schematic of void nucleation at a particle. Separation occurs at the poles of the particle.27
    Fig. 3. Schematic of void nucleation at a particle. Separation occurs at the poles of the particle.27
    (a) 2D configuration of dislocation emission. (b) Stress state at the point of dislocation due to equal biaxial tension σ.20
    Fig. 4. (a) 2D configuration of dislocation emission. (b) Stress state at the point of dislocation due to equal biaxial tension σ.20
    Normalized critical emission stress vs normalized radius of void. The three curves represent three different dislocation widths: w = b, w = 1.5b, and w = 2b.20
    Fig. 5. Normalized critical emission stress vs normalized radius of void. The three curves represent three different dislocation widths: w = b, w = 1.5b, and w = 2b.20
    3D configuration of dislocation emission. Variables with subscript 0 are geometric parameters associated with the prismatic dislocation loop (PDL). z0 = a cos θcr + w is the equilibrium position of the PDL, ρ0 = a sin θcr is the radius of the PDL, and r0=z02+ρ02 and θ0 = arctan(ρ0/z0) specify the position of the PDL.53
    Fig. 6. 3D configuration of dislocation emission. Variables with subscript 0 are geometric parameters associated with the prismatic dislocation loop (PDL). z0 = a cos θcr + w is the equilibrium position of the PDL, ρ0 = a sin θcr is the radius of the PDL, and r0=z02+ρ02 and θ0 = arctan(ρ0/z0) specify the position of the PDL.53
    Effect of porosity f on dislocation emission. σcr/μ and a/b are the normalized critical emission stress and the normalized radius of the void, respectively.53
    Fig. 7. Effect of porosity f on dislocation emission. σcr/μ and a/b are the normalized critical emission stress and the normalized radius of the void, respectively.53
    Effect of stress triaxiality on dislocation emission. η = 0 and η = 1 correspond to the cases of uniaxial tension and hydrostatic tension, respectively.53
    Fig. 8. Effect of stress triaxiality on dislocation emission. η = 0 and η = 1 correspond to the cases of uniaxial tension and hydrostatic tension, respectively.53
    Simulated free-surface velocity profiles. Two strategies of homogenization modeling are adopted: the p-model assumes that a uniform pressure is applied to all unit cells, while the d-model assumes that a uniform strain rate is prescribed on unit cells. For more details, see Czarnota et al.76
    Fig. 9. Simulated free-surface velocity profiles. Two strategies of homogenization modeling are adopted: the p-model assumes that a uniform pressure is applied to all unit cells, while the d-model assumes that a uniform strain rate is prescribed on unit cells. For more details, see Czarnota et al.76
    J-resistance curves for the growth of a ductile crack.78,102 Results are presented for different tractions Ta = 1100 and 1500 MPa and initial void radii a1 = 1.5 and 5 µm.78
    Fig. 10. J-resistance curves for the growth of a ductile crack.78,102 Results are presented for different tractions Ta = 1100 and 1500 MPa and initial void radii a1 = 1.5 and 5 µm.78
    Influence of strain rate on spall strength for aluminum samples with different purity.19,103–110
    Fig. 11. Influence of strain rate on spall strength for aluminum samples with different purity.19,103–110
    Material velocity profiles for different shock stress amplitudes.82
    Fig. 12. Material velocity profiles for different shock stress amplitudes.82
    Haonan Sui, Long Yu, Wenbin Liu, Ying Liu, Yangyang Cheng, Huiling Duan. Theoretical models of void nucleation and growth for ductile metals under dynamic loading: A review[J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2022, 7(1): 018201
    Download Citation