• Infrared and Laser Engineering
  • Vol. 52, Issue 2, 20220164 (2023)
Wei Wang1,2, Xiaoyu Wang1,2, Weijun Liu1,2,*, Fei Xing1,2, and Jing Wang3
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Mechanical Engineering, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang 110870, China
  • 2Liaoning Key Laboratory of Laser Surface EngineeringTechnology, Shenyang 110870, China
  • 3Shenyang Huiyuan Automation Equipment Co., Ltd, Shenyang 110169, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/IRLA20220164 Cite this Article
    Wei Wang, Xiaoyu Wang, Weijun Liu, Fei Xing, Jing Wang. Effect of spot overlapping rate on surface area carbon and oxide cleaning quality of GH3030 alloy[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2023, 52(2): 20220164 Copy Citation Text show less
    Surface morphology and composition of GH3030 superalloy. (a) Original plate; (b) Micro morphology; (c) Surface composition and content; (d) XRD pattern
    Fig. 1. Surface morphology and composition of GH3030 superalloy. (a) Original plate; (b) Micro morphology; (c) Surface composition and content; (d) XRD pattern
    Schematic diagram of laser cleaning device
    Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of laser cleaning device
    Schematic diagram of laser scanning mode and spot overlapping
    Fig. 3. Schematic diagram of laser scanning mode and spot overlapping
    Surface macro morphology before and after laser cleaning
    Fig. 4. Surface macro morphology before and after laser cleaning
    Surface morphology of the sample after laser cleaning with different spot overlapping rates. (a) Not cleaned; (b) 58.33%; (c) 62.5%; (d) 66.67%; (e) 70.83%; (f) 75%
    Fig. 5. Surface morphology of the sample after laser cleaning with different spot overlapping rates. (a) Not cleaned; (b) 58.33%; (c) 62.5%; (d) 66.67%; (e) 70.83%; (f) 75%
    Surface micro morphology of laser cleaning samples under different spot overlapping rates. (a1) Not cleaned; (b1) 58.33%; (c1) 62.5%; (d1) 66.67%; (e1) 70.83%; (a2)-(e2) Corresponding high magnification images
    Fig. 6. Surface micro morphology of laser cleaning samples under different spot overlapping rates. (a1) Not cleaned; (b1) 58.33%; (c1) 62.5%; (d1) 66.67%; (e1) 70.83%; (a2)-(e2) Corresponding high magnification images
    Schematic diagram of laser cleaning process
    Fig. 7. Schematic diagram of laser cleaning process
    Change trend of element content
    Fig. 8. Change trend of element content
    XRD pattern of GH3030 superalloy surface before and after laser cleaning
    Fig. 9. XRD pattern of GH3030 superalloy surface before and after laser cleaning
    Effect of laser spot overlapping rate on sample surface roughness
    Fig. 10. Effect of laser spot overlapping rate on sample surface roughness
    Microhardness of substrate before and after laser cleaning. (a) Microhardness of different points; (b) Average microhardness
    Fig. 11. Microhardness of substrate before and after laser cleaning. (a) Microhardness of different points; (b) Average microhardness
    ElementNiCrCMnTiSiAlFePS
    Content/wt%Allowance19-22≤0.120.70.15-0.350.8≤0.15≤1.50.030.02
    Table 1. Chemical composition of GH3030 alloy
    Laser parametersNumerical value
    Wavelength/nm1064
    Laser power/W200
    Pulse width/ns60
    Spot overlapping rate58.33%, 62.5%, 66.67%, 70.83%, 75%
    Spot diameter/mm1.2
    Pulse frequency/kHz20
    Wire lap rate60%
    Table 2. Cleaning experimental parameters
    SamplesC/ wt% O/ wt% Si/ wt% Cr/ wt% Mn/ wt% Fe/ wt% Ni/ wt%
    Original surface20.062.300.3715.990.86-60.42
    58.337.141.750.3518.320.930.4971.02
    62.56.801.590.3118.470.760.4171.66
    66.675.011.400.3418.990.810.4972.96
    70.837.621.980.4418.030.841.4269.67
    Table 3. Content of surface elements under different spot overlapping rates
    Wei Wang, Xiaoyu Wang, Weijun Liu, Fei Xing, Jing Wang. Effect of spot overlapping rate on surface area carbon and oxide cleaning quality of GH3030 alloy[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2023, 52(2): 20220164
    Download Citation