• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 39, Issue 12, 1206007 (2019)
Weiming Ke, zhenhua Li, Zhixiang Zhou, Yanmei Lin, and Yi Xiao*
Author Affiliations
  • Department of Optoelectronic Engineering, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510632, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS201939.1206007 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Weiming Ke, zhenhua Li, Zhixiang Zhou, Yanmei Lin, Yi Xiao. Reduced Graphene Oxide-Based Interferometric Fiber-Optic Humidity Sensor[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(12): 1206007 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of sensor
    Fig. 1. Schematic of sensor
    Characterization test results of GO and RGO coated on the fiber. (a) Raman spectra of GO and RGO; (b) XRD spectra of GO and RGO; (c)(d) XPS spectra of GO and RGO. Power spectra of C—C bond (284.7 eV), C—O bond (286.9 eV), and surface adsorbed oxygen (532.65 eV) are shown
    Fig. 2. Characterization test results of GO and RGO coated on the fiber. (a) Raman spectra of GO and RGO; (b) XRD spectra of GO and RGO; (c)(d) XPS spectra of GO and RGO. Power spectra of C—C bond (284.7 eV), C—O bond (286.9 eV), and surface adsorbed oxygen (532.65 eV) are shown
    SEM photo of cross section of RGO-covered microfiber
    Fig. 3. SEM photo of cross section of RGO-covered microfiber
    Experimental setup
    Fig. 4. Experimental setup
    Interference spectrum of transmitted light in sensor at 25 ℃ when RH is 65%
    Fig. 5. Interference spectrum of transmitted light in sensor at 25 ℃ when RH is 65%
    Variation of interference spectrum of transmitted light in sensor with humidity at humidity rise stage. (a) 45%RH; (b) 95%RH; (c) 45%RH
    Fig. 6. Variation of interference spectrum of transmitted light in sensor with humidity at humidity rise stage. (a) 45%RH; (b) 95%RH; (c) 45%RH
    Wavelength of interference dip as a function of humidity. (a) Interference dip1; (b) interference dip2
    Fig. 7. Wavelength of interference dip as a function of humidity. (a) Interference dip1; (b) interference dip2
    Responses of interference dip1 and dip2 to variation of temperature at circumstance humidity of 61%
    Fig. 8. Responses of interference dip1 and dip2 to variation of temperature at circumstance humidity of 61%
    Comparison of transmitted light spectra of sensor before and after heating under different conditions. (a) 25 ℃, 65%RH; (b) 25 ℃, 95%RH
    Fig. 9. Comparison of transmitted light spectra of sensor before and after heating under different conditions. (a) 25 ℃, 65%RH; (b) 25 ℃, 95%RH
    Evolution of interference dip2. (a) Evolution of interference dip2 with increase of humidity; (b) evolution of interference dip2 with decrease of humidity; (c) wavelength of interference dip2 as a function of humidity
    Fig. 10. Evolution of interference dip2. (a) Evolution of interference dip2 with increase of humidity; (b) evolution of interference dip2 with decrease of humidity; (c) wavelength of interference dip2 as a function of humidity
    Response of output optical power of sensor to human expiration at transmitted light wavelength of 1568 nm
    Fig. 11. Response of output optical power of sensor to human expiration at transmitted light wavelength of 1568 nm
    Fluctuations of wavelength of interference dip2 at different constant humidity
    Fig. 12. Fluctuations of wavelength of interference dip2 at different constant humidity
    SensorMaximum sensitivityDynamic rangeLiterature
    Carbon nanotube coated etched FBG31 pm/%RH20%-90%[8]
    Calcium chloridecoated LPG1.36 nm/%RH55%-85%[14]
    Nafion coated FPI3.5 nm/%RH22%-80%[18]
    Agarose coated photonic crystal fiber MZI1.43 nm/%RH40%-95%[24]
    PVA coated photonic crystal fiber MI0.6 nm/%RH30%-90%[34]
    Tin oxide coated etched fiber for resonance absorption sensor1.9 nm/%RH20%-90%[39]
    Table 1. Sensors with maximum sensitivities among non-graphene-type OFHSs and their dynamic ranges
    SensorMaximum sensitivityDynamic rangeLiterature
    RGO coated side-polished fiber0.31 dB/%RH70%-95%[40]
    GO coated tilted FBG0.129 dB/%RH10%-80%[41]
    GO/PVA coated waist-enlarged fiber MZI0.193 dB/%RH25%-80%[42]
    GO coated polarization-maintaining fiber MZI0.349 dB/%RH60%-77%[43]
    RGO coated hollow core fiber FPI0.22 dB/%RH60%-90%[44]
    GO coated side-polished fiber for resonance absorption sensor0.915 nm/%RH32%-97.6%[45]
    RGO coated microfiber MZI0.2768 nm/%RH45%-95%This paper
    Table 2. Sensitivities and dynamic ranges of sensors among graphene-type OFHSs
    Weiming Ke, zhenhua Li, Zhixiang Zhou, Yanmei Lin, Yi Xiao. Reduced Graphene Oxide-Based Interferometric Fiber-Optic Humidity Sensor[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(12): 1206007
    Download Citation