• Chinese Optics Letters
  • Vol. 13, Issue 6, 060603 (2015)
Oskars Ozolins* and Vjaceslavs Bobrovs
Author Affiliations
  • Institute of Telecommunications, Riga Technical University, Azenes Street 14/16-500, Riga LV-1048, Latvia
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/COL201513.060603 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Oskars Ozolins, Vjaceslavs Bobrovs. Theoretical study of all-optical RZ-OOK to NRZ-OOK format conversion in uniform FBG for mixed line-rate DWDM systems[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2015, 13(6): 060603 Copy Citation Text show less
    Setup for modulation format conversion: (a) RZ–OOK transmitter; (b) optical receiver; (c) system configuration; (d) 20 and 40 Gbit/s 33% and 50% duty cycle RZ–OOK spectra.
    Fig. 1. Setup for modulation format conversion: (a) RZ–OOK transmitter; (b) optical receiver; (c) system configuration; (d) 20 and 40 Gbit/s 33% and 50% duty cycle RZ–OOK spectra.
    (a) Uniform FBG and RC filters amplitude transfer functions used in the setup; (b) “1” level amplitude ripples evaluation with coefficient.
    Fig. 2. (a) Uniform FBG and RC filters amplitude transfer functions used in the setup; (b) “1” level amplitude ripples evaluation with coefficient.
    Optical spectra for (a) RZ33–OOK and (b) RZ50–OOK in MLR DWDM system (resolution bandwidth, 0.01 nm).
    Fig. 3. Optical spectra for (a) RZ33–OOK and (b) RZ50–OOK in MLR DWDM system (resolution bandwidth, 0.01 nm).
    BER as a function of received power: (a) RZ33–OOK and (f) RZ50–OOK to NRZ–OOK modulation format conversion with different uniform FBG filters for fourth channel in MLR DWDM system. Insets, eye diagrams of B2B; (b) RZ33–OOK and (g) RZ50–OOK signals and converted NRZ–OOK signals after modulation format converters with (c) and (h) 0%, (d) and (i) 10%, and (e) and (j) 30% amplitude noise in uniform contrast profile.
    Fig. 4. BER as a function of received power: (a) RZ33–OOK and (f) RZ50–OOK to NRZ–OOK modulation format conversion with different uniform FBG filters for fourth channel in MLR DWDM system. Insets, eye diagrams of B2B; (b) RZ33–OOK and (g) RZ50–OOK signals and converted NRZ–OOK signals after modulation format converters with (c) and (h) 0%, (d) and (i) 10%, and (e) and (j) 30% amplitude noise in uniform contrast profile.
    BER as a function of received power: (a) RZ33–OOK and (f) RZ50–OOK to NRZ–OOK modulation format conversion with different uniform FBG filters for first channel in MLR DWDM system. Insets, eye diagrams of B2B; (b) RZ33–OOK and (g) RZ50–OOK signals and converted NRZ–OOK signals after modulation format converters with (c) and (h) 0%, (d) and (i) 10%, and (e) and (j) 30% amplitude noise in uniform contrast profile.
    Fig. 5. BER as a function of received power: (a) RZ33–OOK and (f) RZ50–OOK to NRZ–OOK modulation format conversion with different uniform FBG filters for first channel in MLR DWDM system. Insets, eye diagrams of B2B; (b) RZ33–OOK and (g) RZ50–OOK signals and converted NRZ–OOK signals after modulation format converters with (c) and (h) 0%, (d) and (i) 10%, and (e) and (j) 30% amplitude noise in uniform contrast profile.
    (a) Power penalty for MLR RZ33–OOK DWDM system and eye diagrams for converted 20 Gbit/s NRZ–OOK after modulation format converters with (b) 0%, (c) 10%, and (d) 30% amplitude noise in uniform contrast profile and 40 Gbit/s NRZ–OOK after modulation format converters with (e) 0%, (f) 10%, and (g) 30% amplitude noise in uniform contrast profile.
    Fig. 6. (a) Power penalty for MLR RZ33–OOK DWDM system and eye diagrams for converted 20 Gbit/s NRZ–OOK after modulation format converters with (b) 0%, (c) 10%, and (d) 30% amplitude noise in uniform contrast profile and 40 Gbit/s NRZ–OOK after modulation format converters with (e) 0%, (f) 10%, and (g) 30% amplitude noise in uniform contrast profile.
    (a) Power penalty for MLR RZ50–OOK DWDM system and eye diagrams for converted 20 Gbit/s NRZ–OOK after modulation format converters with (b) 0%, (c) 10%, and (d) 30% amplitude noise in uniform contrast profile and 40 Gbit/s NRZ–OOK after modulation format converters with (e) 0%, (f) 10%, and (g) 30% amplitude noise in uniform contrast profile.
    Fig. 7. (a) Power penalty for MLR RZ50–OOK DWDM system and eye diagrams for converted 20 Gbit/s NRZ–OOK after modulation format converters with (b) 0%, (c) 10%, and (d) 30% amplitude noise in uniform contrast profile and 40 Gbit/s NRZ–OOK after modulation format converters with (e) 0%, (f) 10%, and (g) 30% amplitude noise in uniform contrast profile.
    Q factor as a function of offset between uniform FBG central wavelength and channel central wavelength for (a) 40 and (b) 20 Gbit/s RZ–OOK to NRZ–OOK modulation format conversion in MLR DWDM system.
    Fig. 8. Q factor as a function of offset between uniform FBG central wavelength and channel central wavelength for (a) 40 and (b) 20 Gbit/s RZ–OOK to NRZ–OOK modulation format conversion in MLR DWDM system.
    Coefficient as a function of offset between uniform FBG central wavelength and channel central wavelength for (a) 40 and (b) 20 Gbit/s RZ–OOK to NRZ–OOK modulation format conversion in MLR DWDM system.
    Fig. 9. Coefficient as a function of offset between uniform FBG central wavelength and channel central wavelength for (a) 40 and (b) 20 Gbit/s RZ–OOK to NRZ–OOK modulation format conversion in MLR DWDM system.
    Oskars Ozolins, Vjaceslavs Bobrovs. Theoretical study of all-optical RZ-OOK to NRZ-OOK format conversion in uniform FBG for mixed line-rate DWDM systems[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2015, 13(6): 060603
    Download Citation