Author Affiliations
1School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, Anhui , China2Anhui Province Engineering Laboratory for Mine Ecological Remediation, Hefei 230601, Anhui , China3Anhui Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., China Energy Engineering Group, Hefei 230601, Anhui , Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Schematic of progressive morphological filtering
Fig. 2. Schematic of post-processing filtering based on space vector projection
Fig. 3. Original point cloud data. (a) Samp21; (b) Samp31; (c) Samp51; (d) Samp52; (e) Samp53; (f) Samp54
Fig. 4. Ground point cloud extracted by single progressive morphological filtering. (a) Samp21; (b) Samp31; (c) Samp51; (d) Samp52; (e) Samp53; (f) Samp54
Fig. 5. Ground point cloud extracted by progressive morphological filtering and post-processing filtering. (a) Samp21; (b) Samp31; (c) Samp51; (d) Samp52; (e) Samp53; (f) Samp54
Fig. 6. 1 m×1 m resolution DEM and linear regression analysis for Samp21. (a) DSM; (b) reference DEM; (c) DEM without post-processing filtering; (d) DEM with post-processing filtering; (e) linear regression analysis of Fig.6(c) to Fig.6(b); (f) linear regression analysis of Fig.6(d) to Fig.6(b)
Fig. 7. 1 m×1 m resolution DEM and linear regression analysis for Samp31. (a) DSM; (b) reference DEM; (c) DEM without post-processing filtering; (d) DEM with post-processing filtering; (e) linear regression analysis of Fig.7(c) to Fig.7(b); (f) linear regression analysis of Fig.7(d) to Fig.7(b)
Fig. 8. 1 m×1 m resolution DEM and linear regression analysis for Samp51. (a) DSM; (b) reference DEM; (c) DEM without post-processing filtering; (d) DEM with post-processing filtering; (e) linear regression analysis of Fig.8(c) to Fig.8(b); (f) linear regression analysis of Fig.8(d) to Fig.8(b)
Fig. 9. 1 m×1 m resolution DEM and linear regression analysis for Samp54. (a)DSM; (b) reference DEM; (c) DEM without post-processing filtering; (d) DEM with post-processing filtering; (e) linear regression analysis of Fig.9(c) to Fig.9(b); (f) linear regression analysis of Fig.9(d) to Fig.9(b)
Fig. 10. 1 m×1 m resolution DEM and linear regression analysis for Samp52. (a) DSM; (b) reference DEM; (c) DEM without post-processing filtering; (d) DEM with post-processing filtering; (e) linear regression analysis of Fig.10(c) to Fig.10(b); (f) linear regression analysis of Fig.10(d) to Fig.10(b)
Fig. 11. 1 m×1 m resolution DEM and linear regression analysis for Samp53. (a) DSM; (b) reference DEM; (c) DEM without post-processing filtering; (d) DEM with post-processing filtering; (e) linear regression analysis of Fig.11(c) to Fig.11(b); (f) linear regression analysis of Fig.11(d) to Fig.11(b)
Reference point | Filtered point | Sum |
---|
Ground points | Non-ground points |
---|
Ground points | a | b | e=a+b | Non-ground points | c | d | f=c+d | Sum | g=a+c | h=b+d | n=a+b+c+d |
|
Table 1. Cross table
Sample | /m | s | /m | /m | d /m | l /m |
---|
Samp21 | 20 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 3 | 6 | -12 | Samp31 | 20 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 3 | 6 | -12 | Samp51 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | -12 | Samp52 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -20 | Samp53 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -20 | Samp54 | 10 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 3 | 6 | -12 |
|
Table 2. Parameter of point cloud filtering
Sample | No post-processing filtering | | Add post-processing filtering |
---|
Ⅰ-typed error /% | Ⅱ-typed error /% | Total error /% | Kappa | R2 | RMSE | | Ⅰ-typed error /% | Ⅱ-typed error /% | Total error /% | Kappa | R2 | RMSE |
---|
Samp21 | 0.58 | 6.05 | 1.79 | 0.9474 | 0.9852 | 0.0812 | | 0.67 | 4.94 | 1.62 | 0.9526 | 0.9924 | 0.0567 | Samp31 | 0.18 | 4.98 | 2.39 | 0.9517 | 0.8393 | 0.4219 | | 0.23 | 3.02 | 1.52 | 0.9694 | 0.9863 | 0.1087 | Samp51 | 0.26 | 29.58 | 6.66 | 0.7825 | 0.9996 | 0.3521 | | 0.7 | 12.53 | 3.28 | 0.9002 | 0.9999 | 0.1571 | Samp52 | 7.36 | 39.2 | 10.71 | 0.4843 | 0.9975 | 1.3837 | | 9.33 | 24.51 | 10.92 | 0.5325 | 0.9968 | 1.5816 | Samp53 | 3.63 | 52.56 | 5.61 | 0.3772 | 0.9961 | 1.0794 | | 6.37 | 30.31 | 7.34 | 0.4010 | 0.9957 | 1.1347 | Samp54 | 0.65 | 12.74 | 7.14 | 0.8577 | 0.9907 | 0.5526 | | 1.68 | 5.56 | 3.76 | 0.9246 | 0.9981 | 0.2269 |
|
Table 3. Errors, Kappa coefficient, R2, and RMSE of 6 groups of test data