• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 59, Issue 10, 1001001 (2022)
Xiangyong Tian1、2, Hong Hu1、2、*, and Bangxin Xu3
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, Anhui , China
  • 2Anhui Province Engineering Laboratory for Mine Ecological Remediation, Hefei 230601, Anhui , China
  • 3Anhui Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., China Energy Engineering Group, Hefei 230601, Anhui , China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202259.1001001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Xiangyong Tian, Hong Hu, Bangxin Xu. DEM Construction for Airborne LiDAR Data Based on Combined Filtering Algorithm[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(10): 1001001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of progressive morphological filtering
    Fig. 1. Schematic of progressive morphological filtering
    Schematic of post-processing filtering based on space vector projection
    Fig. 2. Schematic of post-processing filtering based on space vector projection
    Original point cloud data. (a) Samp21; (b) Samp31; (c) Samp51; (d) Samp52; (e) Samp53; (f) Samp54
    Fig. 3. Original point cloud data. (a) Samp21; (b) Samp31; (c) Samp51; (d) Samp52; (e) Samp53; (f) Samp54
    Ground point cloud extracted by single progressive morphological filtering. (a) Samp21; (b) Samp31; (c) Samp51; (d) Samp52; (e) Samp53; (f) Samp54
    Fig. 4. Ground point cloud extracted by single progressive morphological filtering. (a) Samp21; (b) Samp31; (c) Samp51; (d) Samp52; (e) Samp53; (f) Samp54
    Ground point cloud extracted by progressive morphological filtering and post-processing filtering. (a) Samp21; (b) Samp31; (c) Samp51; (d) Samp52; (e) Samp53; (f) Samp54
    Fig. 5. Ground point cloud extracted by progressive morphological filtering and post-processing filtering. (a) Samp21; (b) Samp31; (c) Samp51; (d) Samp52; (e) Samp53; (f) Samp54
    1 m×1 m resolution DEM and linear regression analysis for Samp21. (a) DSM; (b) reference DEM; (c) DEM without post-processing filtering; (d) DEM with post-processing filtering; (e) linear regression analysis of Fig.6(c) to Fig.6(b); (f) linear regression analysis of Fig.6(d) to Fig.6(b)
    Fig. 6. 1 m×1 m resolution DEM and linear regression analysis for Samp21. (a) DSM; (b) reference DEM; (c) DEM without post-processing filtering; (d) DEM with post-processing filtering; (e) linear regression analysis of Fig.6(c) to Fig.6(b); (f) linear regression analysis of Fig.6(d) to Fig.6(b)
    1 m×1 m resolution DEM and linear regression analysis for Samp31. (a) DSM; (b) reference DEM; (c) DEM without post-processing filtering; (d) DEM with post-processing filtering; (e) linear regression analysis of Fig.7(c) to Fig.7(b); (f) linear regression analysis of Fig.7(d) to Fig.7(b)
    Fig. 7. 1 m×1 m resolution DEM and linear regression analysis for Samp31. (a) DSM; (b) reference DEM; (c) DEM without post-processing filtering; (d) DEM with post-processing filtering; (e) linear regression analysis of Fig.7(c) to Fig.7(b); (f) linear regression analysis of Fig.7(d) to Fig.7(b)
    1 m×1 m resolution DEM and linear regression analysis for Samp51. (a) DSM; (b) reference DEM; (c) DEM without post-processing filtering; (d) DEM with post-processing filtering; (e) linear regression analysis of Fig.8(c) to Fig.8(b); (f) linear regression analysis of Fig.8(d) to Fig.8(b)
    Fig. 8. 1 m×1 m resolution DEM and linear regression analysis for Samp51. (a) DSM; (b) reference DEM; (c) DEM without post-processing filtering; (d) DEM with post-processing filtering; (e) linear regression analysis of Fig.8(c) to Fig.8(b); (f) linear regression analysis of Fig.8(d) to Fig.8(b)
    1 m×1 m resolution DEM and linear regression analysis for Samp54. (a)DSM; (b) reference DEM; (c) DEM without post-processing filtering; (d) DEM with post-processing filtering; (e) linear regression analysis of Fig.9(c) to Fig.9(b); (f) linear regression analysis of Fig.9(d) to Fig.9(b)
    Fig. 9. 1 m×1 m resolution DEM and linear regression analysis for Samp54. (a)DSM; (b) reference DEM; (c) DEM without post-processing filtering; (d) DEM with post-processing filtering; (e) linear regression analysis of Fig.9(c) to Fig.9(b); (f) linear regression analysis of Fig.9(d) to Fig.9(b)
    1 m×1 m resolution DEM and linear regression analysis for Samp52. (a) DSM; (b) reference DEM; (c) DEM without post-processing filtering; (d) DEM with post-processing filtering; (e) linear regression analysis of Fig.10(c) to Fig.10(b); (f) linear regression analysis of Fig.10(d) to Fig.10(b)
    Fig. 10. 1 m×1 m resolution DEM and linear regression analysis for Samp52. (a) DSM; (b) reference DEM; (c) DEM without post-processing filtering; (d) DEM with post-processing filtering; (e) linear regression analysis of Fig.10(c) to Fig.10(b); (f) linear regression analysis of Fig.10(d) to Fig.10(b)
    1 m×1 m resolution DEM and linear regression analysis for Samp53. (a) DSM; (b) reference DEM; (c) DEM without post-processing filtering; (d) DEM with post-processing filtering; (e) linear regression analysis of Fig.11(c) to Fig.11(b); (f) linear regression analysis of Fig.11(d) to Fig.11(b)
    Fig. 11. 1 m×1 m resolution DEM and linear regression analysis for Samp53. (a) DSM; (b) reference DEM; (c) DEM without post-processing filtering; (d) DEM with post-processing filtering; (e) linear regression analysis of Fig.11(c) to Fig.11(b); (f) linear regression analysis of Fig.11(d) to Fig.11(b)
    Reference pointFiltered pointSum
    Ground pointsNon-ground points
    Ground pointsabe=a+b
    Non-ground pointscdf=c+d
    Sumg=a+ch=b+dn=a+b+c+d
    Table 1. Cross table
    Samplewmax /msh0 /mhmax /md /ml /m
    Samp21200.30.536-12
    Samp31200.30.536-12
    Samp51201136-12
    Samp52201156-20
    Samp53101156-20
    Samp54100.50.536-12
    Table 2. Parameter of point cloud filtering
    SampleNo post-processing filteringAdd post-processing filtering
    Ⅰ‍-typed error /%Ⅱ-typed error /%Total error /%KappaR2RMSEⅠ-typed error /%Ⅱ-typed error /%Total error /%KappaR2RMSE
    Samp210.586.051.790.94740.98520.08120.674.941.620.95260.99240.0567
    Samp310.184.982.390.95170.83930.42190.233.021.520.96940.98630.1087
    Samp510.2629.586.660.78250.99960.35210.712.533.280.90020.99990.1571
    Samp527.3639.210.710.48430.99751.38379.3324.5110.920.53250.99681.5816
    Samp533.6352.565.610.37720.99611.07946.3730.317.340.40100.99571.1347
    Samp540.6512.747.140.85770.99070.55261.685.563.760.92460.99810.2269
    Table 3. Errors, Kappa coefficient, R2, and RMSE of 6 groups of test data
    Xiangyong Tian, Hong Hu, Bangxin Xu. DEM Construction for Airborne LiDAR Data Based on Combined Filtering Algorithm[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(10): 1001001
    Download Citation