• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 40, Issue 9, 0922002 (2020)
Jian Yan1、*, Duzhong Nie1、2, Youduo Peng1, Hai Wang3, Yongxiang Liu1, and Yong Tian1
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Mechanical Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, Hunan 411201, China
  • 2School of Intelligent Equipment Technology, Hunan Vocational College of Science and Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410004, China
  • 3College of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing, Guangdong 526061, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS202040.0922002 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Jian Yan, Duzhong Nie, Youduo Peng, Hai Wang, Yongxiang Liu, Yong Tian. Design of Solar Dish Concentrator for Improving Flux Uniformity on Planar Receiver[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(9): 0922002 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of mirror rearrangement of parabolic dish concentrator. (a) Mirror rearrangement parameters; (b) ray transmission in symmetrical plane of mirror unit km
    Fig. 1. Schematic of mirror rearrangement of parabolic dish concentrator. (a) Mirror rearrangement parameters; (b) ray transmission in symmetrical plane of mirror unit km
    Schematic of generatrix of non-imaging dish concentrator
    Fig. 2. Schematic of generatrix of non-imaging dish concentrator
    Optical discretization of plane receiver
    Fig. 3. Optical discretization of plane receiver
    Optimized design flow chart of solar dish concentrator/plane receiver system
    Fig. 4. Optimized design flow chart of solar dish concentrator/plane receiver system
    Flux distribution in focal plane of improved parabolic dish concentrator system using mirror translation strategy. (a) Comparison of flux distributions before and after improvement; (b) comparison of optimization results under different parameters
    Fig. 5. Flux distribution in focal plane of improved parabolic dish concentrator system using mirror translation strategy. (a) Comparison of flux distributions before and after improvement; (b) comparison of optimization results under different parameters
    Non-uniform factor and optical intercept efficiency of improved parabolic dish concentrator system using mirror translation strategy
    Fig. 6. Non-uniform factor and optical intercept efficiency of improved parabolic dish concentrator system using mirror translation strategy
    Local concentration ratio distribution of improved parabolic dish concentrator system using mirror rotation strategy.(a) K=6, f=8450 mm; (b) K=6, f=6000 mm; (c) K=10, f=8450 mm; (d) K=10, f=6000 mm
    Fig. 7. Local concentration ratio distribution of improved parabolic dish concentrator system using mirror rotation strategy.(a) K=6, f=8450 mm; (b) K=6, f=6000 mm; (c) K=10, f=8450 mm; (d) K=10, f=6000 mm
    Results of improved parabolic dish concentrator system using mirror rotation strategy. (a) Local concentration ratio; (b) non-uniform factor and optical intercept efficiency
    Fig. 8. Results of improved parabolic dish concentrator system using mirror rotation strategy. (a) Local concentration ratio; (b) non-uniform factor and optical intercept efficiency
    Optimization results of non-imaging dish concentrator system. (a) Local concentration ratio; (b) non-uniform factor and optical intercept efficiency
    Fig. 9. Optimization results of non-imaging dish concentrator system. (a) Local concentration ratio; (b) non-uniform factor and optical intercept efficiency
    Local concentration ratio distribution of optimized non-imaging dish concentrator system.(a) K=6, f=8450 mm; (b) K=6, f=6000 mm; (c) K=10, f=8450 mm; (d) K=10, f=6000 mm
    Fig. 10. Local concentration ratio distribution of optimized non-imaging dish concentrator system.(a) K=6, f=8450 mm; (b) K=6, f=6000 mm; (c) K=10, f=8450 mm; (d) K=10, f=6000 mm
    Optical model of non-imaging dish system based on OptisWorks software
    Fig. 11. Optical model of non-imaging dish system based on OptisWorks software
    Flux density distributions of metal coil receiver under different concentrators. (a) With parabolic dish concentrator; (b) with optimized non-imaging dish concentrator
    Fig. 12. Flux density distributions of metal coil receiver under different concentrators. (a) With parabolic dish concentrator; (b) with optimized non-imaging dish concentrator
    ParameterValue
    R /mm7000
    f /mm8450, 6000
    K6, 10
    MK[12, 12, 12, 24, 24, 24] when K=6[12, 12, 12, 12, 12, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24] when K=10
    R1/mm200
    ρm0.93
    W0 /(W·m-2)800
    Solar half angle δ /mrad4.65
    Absorptivity of plane receiver ρwall1.0
    Rconstrain /mm200
    Rtarget /mm180
    Table 1. Geometric parameter and optical parameter of solar concentrator system
    Kf /mmTCaverageF(X)Cmax
    8450Ideal parabolic dish concentrator1402.003.6224737.01
    6000Ideal parabolic dish concentrator1402.004.2237245.26
    68450[292.35, 231.96, 336.69, -236.19, 180.59, -131.88]1264.950.341820.83
    6000[-157.84, 146.86, 242.00, 158.88, 108.55, -66.92]1321.140.371935.91
    108450[-292.35, -100.19, -264.90, 179.80, 336.69, -261.18, -208.04, -185.48, -154.95, 122.24]1327.350.301821.69
    6000[-188.04, -259.41, 146.86, -299.16, 242.00, 183.05, -145.26, 107.86, 89.62, -48.52]1257.550.311763.81
    Table 2. Optimization results of improved parabolic dish concentrator system using mirror translation strategy
    Kf /mmG1CaverageF(X)Cmax
    68450[-9.199, -4.233, 8.009, 7.032, 6.105, 2.848]1380.410.362399.40
    6000[8.212, 11.627, 10.799, 8.534, 5.776, 3.204]1395.900.512909.45
    108450[-7.556, 7.986, 2.508, 8.066, 7.752, 6.952, 2.346, -5.712, 5.254, 4.154]1396.800.422709.23
    6000[9.278, 13.176, 4.202, 11.345, -9.955, 9.328, 7.449, 6.148, 3.840, 3.701]1393.650.472306.62
    Table 3. Optimization results of improved parabolic dish concentrator system using mirror rotation strategy
    Kf /mmG2CaverageF(X)Cmax
    68450[8.839, 8.800, 7.692, 2.745, 6.200, 4.885]1324.670.181730.97
    6000[-7.046, 11.530, 10.551, 8.271, 5.965, -2.638]1351.140.201722.93
    108450[-1.511, 7.773, -5.589, 8.067, -3.153, 2.365, 6.567, 6.200, -5.314, 4.885]1349.910.211798.43
    6000[-3.898, 9.788, 12.405, -11.400, 7.990, 8.758, 7.755, -5.748, 2.280, -3.451]1357.500.252055.24
    Table 4. Optimization results of parameters of non-imaging dish concentrator system
    Jian Yan, Duzhong Nie, Youduo Peng, Hai Wang, Yongxiang Liu, Yong Tian. Design of Solar Dish Concentrator for Improving Flux Uniformity on Planar Receiver[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(9): 0922002
    Download Citation