• Chinese Journal of Lasers
  • Vol. 48, Issue 19, 1918003 (2021)
Yibo Ni, Shun Wen, Zicheng Shen, and Yuanmu Yang*
Author Affiliations
  • Key Laboratory of Precision Measurement Technology and Instruments, Department of Precision Instrument, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/CJL202148.1918003 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yibo Ni, Shun Wen, Zicheng Shen, Yuanmu Yang. Multidimensional Light Field Sensing Based on Metasurfaces[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2021, 48(19): 1918003 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    Significance Light is an electromagnetic wave that carries information of multiple dimensions, such as intensity, phase, frequency, and polarization. The change in the intensity, spectrum, polarization, and other information as a result of the interaction between objects and the light field can reflect the material, morphology, and other characteristics of the objects. However, traditional photodetectors can only detect two-dimensional (2D) light intensity information. To perceive more dimensional optical field information, additional optical components and mechanical devices are required, which will result in issues such as the system’s large volume and complex structure. Many applications today, such as three-dimensional (3D) face recognition, automatic driving, and remote sensing, have an urgent need for miniaturization and lightweight optical systems, presenting a significant opportunity for the development of integrated optical field sensing systems.

    A spectrum is a valuable tool for object characterization and analysis, and it is widely used in food safety, environmental monitoring, biological imaging, archaeological exploration, and other fields. Traditional dispersive and interference spectrometers can provide ultra-fine spectral resolution as well as an ultra-wide spectral detection range. Traditional spectrometers, however, have limitations in situations where real-time spectral detection is required due to the presence of optical and mechanical moving parts with large volumes and weight. People anticipate that in the future, spectral sensing devices will be reduced to centimeters or even millimeters in size and will be integrated into smartphones, drones, and other microsystems.

    The measurement of light’s polarization state is important in fields, such as remote sensing, medical treatment, and optical communication. Traditional polarization measurement methods are divided into two types: division-of-time and division-of-amplitude. Division-of-time polarimeters measure the intensity of various polarization components by positioning a set of rotating waveplates and polarizers in front of the detector. This method often relies on mechanical rotating structures, resulting in slow measurement speed and reliability. Polarizing beam splitters are used in division-of-amplitude polarimeters to separate different polarization components into different detectors. Both methods have problems, such as large volume and complex measurement system structure.

    Many emerging technologies, such as autonomous vehicles, face recognition, robotics, and augmented reality, rely on 3D imaging techniques. There are two types of 3D imaging techniques: active and passive. Active methods typically necessitate structured illumination or scanning, which adds complexity, cost, and power consumption. Passive methods, which typically use multiple views, have limited accuracy and a high computation cost. 3D imaging techniques based on conventional optical elements are limited by high cost, large size, high power consumption, and complex systems for applications requiring compactness, integration, and portability.

    Metasurfaces are novel planar optical elements that can control the light field by deploying subwavelength artificial antennas on the surface. Subwavelength structures of metasurfaces, unlike traditional optical elements, can interact with the incident electromagnetic field, causing abrupt changes in optical parameters on the surface and breaking traditional optical elements' dependence on the propagation optical path. Because of this property, metasurfaces can modulate the amplitude, phase, polarization, and other properties of the light field within the subwavelength thickness in a very flexible and powerful way. As a result, metasurfaces open up new avenues for the miniaturization and integration of spectrometers, polarimeters, and depth information perception (Fig. 1). We review recent research on spectral, polarization, and depth information sensing based on metasurfaces in this paper.

    Progress The ability of metasurfaces to flexibly regulate the spectrum opens up a new avenue for the realization of integrated spectrum sensing systems. Metasurface-based spectrometers are classified into two types based on their operating principles: narrowband filtering and computational spectrometers. Narrowband filtering spectrometers use a single tunable narrowband filter or narrowband filter array to achieve spectral sampling (Figs. 2--4). Computational spectrometers do not require narrowband filters. The spectral response of the filters can be wide and random, which makes designing narrowband filter metasurfaces much easier. Computational spectrometers can extract the original spectrum from obtained signals using algorithms (Fig. 5).

    In recent years, researchers have proposed several types of metasurface-based polarimeters, including division-of-amplitude (Figs. 6--8), division-of-time (Fig. 9), detector-integrated (Fig. 10), and others (Fig. 11). Metasurface-based division-of-amplitude polarimeters use metal gratings, scatters, or metalenses to distinguish the light with different polarization components in space and measure the intensity of each polarization component with detectors. Division-of-time polarimeters are based on tunable metasurfaces, which replace the waveplates and polarizers in conventional polarimeter systems and can modulate the polarization state of the incident light. Detector-integrated polarimeters are built around metasurfaces that can convert different polarization components' light into different electrical signals. The polarization state of the incident light can be determined by measuring the intensity of photocurrents. In addition, recently proposed polarimeters based on metasurface polarizers, holograms, and other technologies are discussed.

    Metasurfaces’ flexible wavefront manipulation enables them to realize 3D imaging systems with a miniaturized form factor and improved performance, for both active and passive methods. Typical active 3D imaging techniques include the structured light method and the beam steering method. Structured illumination achieved by metasurfaces has a simplified optical system and a much larger field of view (Fig. 12). Beam steering realized by metasurfaces is flexible, has low power consumption and high steering speed, and can reduce size and weight of metasurfaces (Fig. 13). The use of metasurfaces in passive methods has the advantages of high compactness, semiconductor process compatibility, high accuracy, and the ability to detect more dimensions of the light field with the help of algorithms (Figs. 14--16).

    Conclusion and Prospects This paper introduces the sensing of multidimensional light fields, such as spectrum, polarization, and depth information using metasurfaces. Future research into the flexibility of metasurfaces, such as combining metasurface design and reconstruction algorithms with inverse design, end-to-end optimization, deep learning, and other computer technologies, is expected to result in a simultaneous perception of more dimensional light field information. With the in-depth understanding of metamaterial surface, the exploration of new metamaterial surface design, and the improvement of large-scale micro-nano processing technology, metasurface will have a bright application prospect in the field of lightweight integrated multidimensional light field perception.

    Yibo Ni, Shun Wen, Zicheng Shen, Yuanmu Yang. Multidimensional Light Field Sensing Based on Metasurfaces[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2021, 48(19): 1918003
    Download Citation