• Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves
  • Vol. 39, Issue 2, 211 (2020)
Zi-Cheng WANG1, Xin-Wen SHANG1, Lin-Lin CAO1、2, Bo-Jun TANG1, and Liu XIAO1
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on High Power Microwave Sources and Technologies, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing0400, China
  • 2School of Electric,Electrical and Communicaion Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100039, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.11972/j.issn.1001-9014.2020.02.008 Cite this Article
    Zi-Cheng WANG, Xin-Wen SHANG, Lin-Lin CAO, Bo-Jun TANG, Liu XIAO. Investigation on a W-band high efficiency extended interaction oscillator based on phase re-synchronization technology[J]. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 2020, 39(2): 211 Copy Citation Text show less
    Model for calculating s11 of a single cavity composed of 12 periods of SDRWSWS and calculated results (a) a period of SDRWSWS, (b)model for calculating s11, (c) calculated s11;(d)the calculated results Ezc of the z component of electric field intensity at the z-axis and the fitness Ezs
    Fig. 1. Model for calculating s11 of a single cavity composed of 12 periods of SDRWSWS and calculated results (a) a period of SDRWSWS, (b)model for calculating s11, (c) calculated s11;(d)the calculated results Ezc of the z component of electric field intensity at the z-axis and the fitness Ezs
    Dispersion curve of even period resonant cavity and 19 kV electron beam line
    Fig. 2. Dispersion curve of even period resonant cavity and 19 kV electron beam line
    Affects on even period EIO of beam voltage (a)PIC model for a single cavity EIO based on 12 periods of even SDRWSWS, (b)normalized output voltage under a 19 kV,300 mA beam, (c) FFT of normalized output voltage under a 19 kV,300mA beam, (d)curve of frequencies vs beam voltage, (e) curve of powers vs beam voltage and electron efficiencies vs beam voltage, (f) normalized output voltage under a 21 kV,300 mA beam
    Fig. 3. Affects on even period EIO of beam voltage (a)PIC model for a single cavity EIO based on 12 periods of even SDRWSWS, (b)normalized output voltage under a 19 kV,300 mA beam, (c) FFT of normalized output voltage under a 19 kV,300mA beam, (d)curve of frequencies vs beam voltage, (e) curve of powers vs beam voltage and electron efficiencies vs beam voltage, (f) normalized output voltage under a 21 kV,300 mA beam
    Affects on even period EIO of beam current (a) curve of frequencies vs beam current, (b) curve of powers vs beam current and electron efficiencies vs beam voltage
    Fig. 4. Affects on even period EIO of beam current (a) curve of frequencies vs beam current, (b) curve of powers vs beam current and electron efficiencies vs beam voltage
    Compared performances of even period EIO and uneven period EIO (a)Frequencies of even period EIO and uneven period EIO under varied beam voltage, (b) powers of even period EIO and uneven period EIO under varied beam voltage, (c) electron efficiencies of even period EIO and uneven period EIO under varied beam voltage, (d)Frequencies of even period EIO and uneven period EIO under varied beam current, (e) powers of even period EIO and uneven period EIO under varied beam current, (f) electron efficiencies of even period EIO and uneven period EIO under varied beam current
    Fig. 5. Compared performances of even period EIO and uneven period EIO (a)Frequencies of even period EIO and uneven period EIO under varied beam voltage, (b) powers of even period EIO and uneven period EIO under varied beam voltage, (c) electron efficiencies of even period EIO and uneven period EIO under varied beam voltage, (d)Frequencies of even period EIO and uneven period EIO under varied beam current, (e) powers of even period EIO and uneven period EIO under varied beam current, (f) electron efficiencies of even period EIO and uneven period EIO under varied beam current
    Calculated results of the even period cavity compared with of the uneven period cavity (a) calculated s11 of the even period cavity compared with calculated s11 of the uneven period cavity, (b) calculated result Ezc of Ez in the even period cavity compared with calculated result Ezc-uneven of Ez in the uneven period cavity
    Fig. 6. Calculated results of the even period cavity compared with of the uneven period cavity (a) calculated s11 of the even period cavity compared with calculated s11 of the uneven period cavity, (b) calculated result Ezc of Ez in the even period cavity compared with calculated result Ezc-uneven of Ez in the uneven period cavity
    The calculated results Ezc of the z component of electric field intensity at the z-axis and the fitness Ezs (i ) (a)comparison between Ezc and Ezs (1) within periods 1~4, (b)comparison between Ezc and Ezs (2) within periods 5~6, (c)comparison between Ezc and Ezs (3) within periods7~12
    Fig. 7. The calculated results Ezc of the z component of electric field intensity at the z-axis and the fitness Ezs (i ) (a)comparison between Ezc and Ezs (1) within periods 1~4, (b)comparison between Ezc and Ezs (2) within periods 5~6, (c)comparison between Ezc and Ezs (3) within periods7~12
    Calculated power vs time of even period EIO compared with of uneven period EIO under a 300 mA,18.7 kV beam
    Fig. 8. Calculated power vs time of even period EIO compared with of uneven period EIO under a 300 mA,18.7 kV beam
    a/mmb/mmp/mmt/mmr/mm
    1.80.80.80.240.22
    Table 1. Structural parameters of SDRWSWS
    n12345
    fmin(n)/GHz94.5595.496.7998.66100.89
    Table 2. Calculated frequencies according to the minimums of s11 of even period resonant cavity
    n12345
    f1min(n)/GHz94.7695.5396.9598.88101.06
    Table 3. calculated frequencies according to the minimums of s11 of uneven period resonant cavity
    Zi-Cheng WANG, Xin-Wen SHANG, Lin-Lin CAO, Bo-Jun TANG, Liu XIAO. Investigation on a W-band high efficiency extended interaction oscillator based on phase re-synchronization technology[J]. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 2020, 39(2): 211
    Download Citation