Author Affiliations
1Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on High Power Microwave Sources and Technologies, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing0400, China2School of Electric,Electrical and Communicaion Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100039, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Model for calculating s11 of a single cavity composed of 12 periods of SDRWSWS and calculated results (a) a period of SDRWSWS, (b)model for calculating s11, (c) calculated s11;(d)the calculated results Ezc of the z component of electric field intensity at the z-axis and the fitness Ezs
Fig. 2. Dispersion curve of even period resonant cavity and 19 kV electron beam line
Fig. 3. Affects on even period EIO of beam voltage (a)PIC model for a single cavity EIO based on 12 periods of even SDRWSWS, (b)normalized output voltage under a 19 kV,300 mA beam, (c) FFT of normalized output voltage under a 19 kV,300mA beam, (d)curve of frequencies vs beam voltage, (e) curve of powers vs beam voltage and electron efficiencies vs beam voltage, (f) normalized output voltage under a 21 kV,300 mA beam
Fig. 4. Affects on even period EIO of beam current (a) curve of frequencies vs beam current, (b) curve of powers vs beam current and electron efficiencies vs beam voltage
Fig. 5. Compared performances of even period EIO and uneven period EIO (a)Frequencies of even period EIO and uneven period EIO under varied beam voltage, (b) powers of even period EIO and uneven period EIO under varied beam voltage, (c) electron efficiencies of even period EIO and uneven period EIO under varied beam voltage, (d)Frequencies of even period EIO and uneven period EIO under varied beam current, (e) powers of even period EIO and uneven period EIO under varied beam current, (f) electron efficiencies of even period EIO and uneven period EIO under varied beam current
Fig. 6. Calculated results of the even period cavity compared with of the uneven period cavity (a) calculated s11 of the even period cavity compared with calculated s11 of the uneven period cavity, (b) calculated result Ezc of Ez in the even period cavity compared with calculated result Ezc-uneven of Ez in the uneven period cavity
Fig. 7. The calculated results Ezc of the z component of electric field intensity at the z-axis and the fitness Ezs (i ) (a)comparison between Ezc and Ezs (1) within periods 1~4, (b)comparison between Ezc and Ezs (2) within periods 5~6, (c)comparison between Ezc and Ezs (3) within periods7~12
Fig. 8. Calculated power vs time of even period EIO compared with of uneven period EIO under a 300 mA,18.7 kV beam
a/mm | b/mm | p/mm | t/mm | r/mm |
---|
1.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.24 | 0.22 |
|
Table 1. Structural parameters of SDRWSWS
n | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
---|
fmin(n)/GHz | 94.55 | 95.4 | 96.79 | 98.66 | 100.89 |
|
Table 2. Calculated frequencies according to the minimums of s11 of even period resonant cavity
n | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
---|
f1min(n)/GHz | 94.76 | 95.53 | 96.95 | 98.88 | 101.06 |
|
Table 3. calculated frequencies according to the minimums of s11 of uneven period resonant cavity