• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 57, Issue 8, 081105 (2020)
Yuqi Ye1 and Wenjin Hu1、2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Mathematics and Computer Science, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of China's Ethnic Languages and Information Technology of Ministry of Education, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP57.081105 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yuqi Ye, Wenjin Hu. No-Reference Quality Assessment Method for Inpainting Thangka Image Based on Multiple Features[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(8): 081105 Copy Citation Text show less
    Line drawing of inpainting Thangka image and threshold effect images. (a) Scratch damaged of Thangka image; (b) massive damaged of Thangka image; (c) inpainting image based on sample block-based model; (d) inpainting image based on TV model ; (e)(f)line drawing of DOG operator; (g)(h), (i)(j), (k)(l) threshold effect image, φ=1.2, 1.6, and 2.0,respectively
    Fig. 1. Line drawing of inpainting Thangka image and threshold effect images. (a) Scratch damaged of Thangka image; (b) massive damaged of Thangka image; (c) inpainting image based on sample block-based model; (d) inpainting image based on TV model ; (e)(f)line drawing of DOG operator; (g)(h), (i)(j), (k)(l) threshold effect image, φ=1.2, 1.6, and 2.0,respectively
    Effect of symmetric fusion image
    Fig. 2. Effect of symmetric fusion image
    Linear diagram between color entropy and different inpainting image. (a) Color entropy diagram of massive damage; (b) color entropy diagram of scratch damage
    Fig. 3. Linear diagram between color entropy and different inpainting image. (a) Color entropy diagram of massive damage; (b) color entropy diagram of scratch damage
    Structure of the BP-AdaBoost neural network
    Fig. 4. Structure of the BP-AdaBoost neural network
    Image restoration of damaged Thangka. (a) Scratch damaged of Thangka image; (b) massive damaged of Thangkaimage; (c) repaired image based on TV model; (d) repaired image based on sample block-based model
    Fig. 5. Image restoration of damaged Thangka. (a) Scratch damaged of Thangka image; (b) massive damaged of Thangkaimage; (c) repaired image based on TV model; (d) repaired image based on sample block-based model
    Scatter plots of different evaluation algorithms and corresponding DMOS values on Thangka database. (a) Method in Ref. [15]; (b) method in Ref. [26]; (c) method in Ref. [16]; (d) proposed method
    Fig. 6. Scatter plots of different evaluation algorithms and corresponding DMOS values on Thangka database. (a) Method in Ref. [15]; (b) method in Ref. [26]; (c) method in Ref. [16]; (d) proposed method
    Comparison of robustness among different algorithms
    Fig. 7. Comparison of robustness among different algorithms
    Damaged modelInpainting modelImage numberNumber of subjective evaluation
    ScratchTV model2006
    MassiveSample block-based model3007
    ScratchSample block-based model3008
    MassiveTV model2009
    Table 1. Composition of Thangka database
    MethodScratch-TVmodelMassive-sampleblock-based modelScratch-sampleblock-based modelMassive-TVmodelAll
    PSNR0.86460.88310.92100.75150.8636
    SSIM0.93890.94460.92350.90460.9129
    Method in Ref. [12]0.84310.93910.93730.95420.9545
    Method in Ref. [13]0.93940.94490.92720.92460.9647
    ASVS0.89350.94180.92820.94240.8954
    DN0.90400.92910.92020.89830.9063
    Method in Ref. [15]0.93250.94110.92840.94280.9326
    Method in Ref. [26]0.90390.92870.93160.94030.9172
    Method in Ref. [16]0.89990.94670.93490.94350.9314
    Proposed method0.93270.94850.93390.97410.9463
    Table 2. SROCC median of different types of repaired images in Thangka database iterate 1000 times
    MethodScratch-TVmodelMassive-sampleblock-based modelScratch-sampleblock-based modelMassive-TVmodelAll
    PSNR0.87620.90290.91730.78010.8592
    SSIM0.94050.93630.93240.90040.9066
    Method in Ref. [12]0.83010.92680.95830.96400.9511
    Method in Ref. [13]0.94940.94490.93720.93000.9613
    ASVS0.85460.93560.93650.96880.8678
    DN0.90410.92920.93020.89830.9063
    Method in Ref. [15]0.93250.92110.95840.93280.9326
    Method in Ref. [26]0.90400.92880.95160.94030.9172
    Method in Ref. [16]0.86450.93670.92340.98680.9432
    Proposed method0.94460.93930.95550.97950.9492
    Table 3. PLCC median of different types of repaired images in Thangka database iterate 1000 times
    MethodAverage time /s
    Method in Ref. [12]18.342
    Method in Ref. [13]56.987
    ASVS0.0546
    DN4.8452
    Method in Ref. [15]0.0325
    Method in Ref. [26]63.676
    Method in Ref. [16]1.1645
    Proposed method1.2235
    Table 4. Average time to process an image by different algorithms on Thangka database
    Yuqi Ye, Wenjin Hu. No-Reference Quality Assessment Method for Inpainting Thangka Image Based on Multiple Features[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(8): 081105
    Download Citation