Author Affiliations
1School of Information Engineering, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 0 50031, China2Hebei Center for Ecological and Environmental Geology Research, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 0 50031, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Structure of image G
Fig. 2. Structure diagram of the PNN
Fig. 3. Grayscale histograms of foreground and background. (a) Original image; (b) grayscale histogram of the foreground; (c) grayscale histogram of the background
Fig. 4. Flow chart of PNN_GrabCut algorithm
Fig. 5. Experimental example. (a) Original image; (b) label image
Fig. 6. Segmentation results of different algorithms. (a) Original image; (b) GrabCut algorithm; (c) PNN_GrabCut algorithm; (d) algorithm of Ref. [12]; (d) algorithm of Ref. [16]
Fig. 7. Segmentation results of different algorithms. (a) Original image; (b) GrabCut algorithm; (c) PNN_GrabCut algorithm
Pixel No. | 190-194 | 195-199 | 185-199 | 180-184 | 40-44 | 45-49 | 175-179 | 155-159 |
---|
Amount | 1418 | 1372 | 1020 | 584 | 405 | 354 | 317 | 272 |
|
Table 1. Statistics of the high pixel value in foreground
Pixel No. | 160-164 | 165-169 | 175-179 | 155-159 | 170-174 | 180-184 | 150-154 | 145-149 |
---|
Amount | 3224 | 2304 | 2253 | 2246 | 2176 | 1330 | 1144 | 414 |
|
Table 2. Statistics of the high pixel value in background
Class | Train set | Validation set |
---|
Person | 5075 | 526 | Plane | 135 | 12 |
|
Table 3. Experimental data
σ | n | P/% |
---|
0.0005 | 153 | 2.94 | 0.001 | 631 | 12.11 | 0.005 | 2413 | 46.31 | 0.01 | 766 | 14.70 | 0.05 | 509 | 9.77 | 0.1 | 540 | 10.37 | 0.5 | 198 | 3.80 |
|
Table 4. PNN prediction results at different σ(experiment1)
σ | n | P/% |
---|
0.003 | 191 | 7.92 | 0.004 | 379 | 15.70 | 0.005 | 1206 | 49.98 | 0.006 | 435 | 18.03 | 0.007 | 202 | 8.37 |
|
Table 5. PNN prediction results at different σ (experiment2)
Algorithm | Average value of F1 | Average time | F1 increase rate/% | Time increase rate/% |
---|
GrabCut | 0.809 | 6.501 | / | / | PNN_GrabCut | 0.857 | 5.229 | 5.93 | 19.57 | Ref. [12] | 0.827 | 4.728 | 2.22 | 27.27 | Ref. [16] | 0.846 | 5.419 | 4.57 | 16.64 |
|
Table 6. Average F1 and running time of different algorithms