• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 39, Issue 3, 0311004 (2019)
Guangmang Cui1、2, Kuaikuai Yu2、*, Xiaojie Ye1, Jufeng Zhao1, and Liyao Zhu1
Author Affiliations
  • 1 School of Electronics and Information, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310018, China
  • 2 Science and Technology on Electro-Optical Information Security Control Laboratory, Tianjin 300308, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS201939.0311004 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Guangmang Cui, Kuaikuai Yu, Xiaojie Ye, Jufeng Zhao, Liyao Zhu. Searching Method for Optimal Code Sequence of Coded Exposure Based on Memetic Algorithm[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(3): 0311004 Copy Citation Text show less
    Traditional exposure mode. (a) Imaging exposure model; (b) Fourier transform amplitude curve
    Fig. 1. Traditional exposure mode. (a) Imaging exposure model; (b) Fourier transform amplitude curve
    Coded exposure mode. (a) Coded exposure imaging model; (b) Fourier transform amplitude curve
    Fig. 2. Coded exposure mode. (a) Coded exposure imaging model; (b) Fourier transform amplitude curve
    Searching method for optimal code sequence of coded exposure based on Memetic algorithm
    Fig. 3. Searching method for optimal code sequence of coded exposure based on Memetic algorithm
    Comparison of frequency amplitude curves for code sequence of 32 bits
    Fig. 4. Comparison of frequency amplitude curves for code sequence of 32 bits
    Comparison of frequency amplitude curves for code sequence of 52 bits
    Fig. 5. Comparison of frequency amplitude curves for code sequence of 52 bits
    Comparison of frequency amplitude curves for code sequence of 112 bits
    Fig. 6. Comparison of frequency amplitude curves for code sequence of 112 bits
    Simulated blurred images and deblurring results for image “Target” with code sequence of 32 bits. (a) Traditional exposure mode; (b) coded exposure mode plus genetic search method; (c) coded exposure mode plus Memetic searching method
    Fig. 7. Simulated blurred images and deblurring results for image “Target” with code sequence of 32 bits. (a) Traditional exposure mode; (b) coded exposure mode plus genetic search method; (c) coded exposure mode plus Memetic searching method
    Simulated blurred images and deblurring results for image “Target” with code sequence of 32 bits. (a) Traditional exposure mode; (b) coded exposure mode plus genetic search method; (c) coded exposure mode plus Memetic searching method
    Fig. 8. Simulated blurred images and deblurring results for image “Target” with code sequence of 32 bits. (a) Traditional exposure mode; (b) coded exposure mode plus genetic search method; (c) coded exposure mode plus Memetic searching method
    Simulated blurred images and deblurring results for image “Cameraman” with code sequence of 32 bits. (a)Traditional exposure mode; (b) coded exposure mode plus genetic search method; (c) coded exposure mode plus Memetic searching method
    Fig. 9. Simulated blurred images and deblurring results for image “Cameraman” with code sequence of 32 bits. (a)Traditional exposure mode; (b) coded exposure mode plus genetic search method; (c) coded exposure mode plus Memetic searching method
    Simulated blurred images and deblurring results for image “Cameraman” with code sequence of 52 bits. (a) Traditional exposure mode; (b) coded exposure mode plus genetic search method; (c) coded exposure mode plus Memetic searching method
    Fig. 10. Simulated blurred images and deblurring results for image “Cameraman” with code sequence of 52 bits. (a) Traditional exposure mode; (b) coded exposure mode plus genetic search method; (c) coded exposure mode plus Memetic searching method
    Code sequence lengthEvaluate indexGenetic search methodProposed method
    32MIN0.260.85
    VAR6.073.62
    52MIN0.350.46
    VAR9.175.39
    112MIN0.390.44
    VAR24.7219.55
    Table 1. Objective evaluation results of frequency amplitude curves for code sequence
    Code sequence lengthExhaustion methodGenetic search methodProposed method
    32~1.491´1054.0353.862
    52~1.262´10117.2645.678
    112~1.455´102922.04314.768
    Table 2. Execution time of searching methods for optimal code sequences
    Code sequence lengthPSF lengthEvaluateindexTraditional exposure methodCoded exposure by genetic search methodCoded exposure by proposed method
    327SNR15.431027.665136.6306
    SSIM0.83520.97790.9914
    5211SNR14.606531.655836.4372
    SSIM0.80830.98520.9904
    Table 3. Objective evaluation results of simulated deblurring images for image “Target”
    Code sequence lengthPSF lengthEvaluateindexTraditional exposure methodCoded exposure by genetic search methodCoded exposure by proposed method
    327SNR10.490029.523332.5042
    SSIM0.24750.93760.9633
    5211SNR7.814427.426232.2805
    SSIM0.15470.92450.9621
    Table 4. Objective evaluation results of simulated deblurring images for image “Cameraman”
    Guangmang Cui, Kuaikuai Yu, Xiaojie Ye, Jufeng Zhao, Liyao Zhu. Searching Method for Optimal Code Sequence of Coded Exposure Based on Memetic Algorithm[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(3): 0311004
    Download Citation