• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 9, Issue 4, 541 (2021)
Yitong Wu1、2、3, Liangliang Ji1、3、5、*, and Ruxin Li1、3、4、6、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of High Field Laser Physics, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
  • 2Center of Materials Science and Optoelectronics Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 3CAS Center for Excellence in Ultra-intense Laser Science, Shanghai 201800, China
  • 4ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China
  • 5e-mail: jill@siom.ac.cn
  • 6e-mail: ruxinli@mail.siom.ac.cn
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.416555 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yitong Wu, Liangliang Ji, Ruxin Li. On the upper limit of laser intensity attainable in nonideal vacuum[J]. Photonics Research, 2021, 9(4): 541 Copy Citation Text show less
    Distributions of (a) laser electric fields Ey (b) γ photons density nγ as well as (c) electron–positron density ne+p at tf=300T0 and ne0=1011 cm−3 for a=10000 (top panel) and a=5000 case (bottom panel), respectively. The Ey is normalized by meωc/e, while densities are normalized by critical density nc.
    Fig. 1. Distributions of (a) laser electric fields Ey (b) γ photons density nγ as well as (c) electron–positron density ne+p at tf=300T0 and ne0=1011  cm3 for a=10000 (top panel) and a=5000 case (bottom panel), respectively. The Ey is normalized by meωc/e, while densities are normalized by critical density nc.
    Electron number density in the momentum space Px−Py at focusing time tf and ne0=1011 cm−3 for (a) a=1000, (b) a=5000, and (c) a=10,000, respectively. The Px and Py are normalized by mec.
    Fig. 2. Electron number density in the momentum space PxPy at focusing time tf and ne0=1011  cm3 for (a) a=1000, (b) a=5000, and (c) a=10,000, respectively. The Px and Py are normalized by mec.
    (a) Ne+p and (b) Nγ evolution for a=5000 (blue solid and pentagrams) and a=10,000 (red dashed and squares) obtained from simulation (symbols) and theoretical analysis (lines); (c) ratio between the measured peak intensity in simulations and the designed one as a function of designed peak intensity under electron densities of ne0=1015 cm−3 (blue dotted and squares), 1013 cm−3 (red dashed and pentagrams), 1011 cm−3 (black solid and circles). The symbols are results measured from simulation while lines are from the theoretical model. All symbols represent average values for ten simulation cases with different random seeds, while the error bars represent peak intensity quantile of 95% and 5% (error bar gives a confidence interval of 90%), separately. (d) The theoretical prediction of peak intensity distributions as a function of the designed peak intensity and ne0 (from 6×107 to 1015 cm−3).
    Fig. 3. (a) Ne+p and (b) Nγ evolution for a=5000 (blue solid and pentagrams) and a=10,000 (red dashed and squares) obtained from simulation (symbols) and theoretical analysis (lines); (c) ratio between the measured peak intensity in simulations and the designed one as a function of designed peak intensity under electron densities of ne0=1015cm3 (blue dotted and squares), 1013cm3 (red dashed and pentagrams), 1011  cm3 (black solid and circles). The symbols are results measured from simulation while lines are from the theoretical model. All symbols represent average values for ten simulation cases with different random seeds, while the error bars represent peak intensity quantile of 95% and 5% (error bar gives a confidence interval of 90%), separately. (d) The theoretical prediction of peak intensity distributions as a function of the designed peak intensity and ne0 (from 6×107to1015  cm3).
    (a) Obtained peak intensity evolution at a=6000 for different vacuum electron densities ne0. The black circles, red pentagrams, and blue squares represent average peak intensity measured in simulations. The solid black line, dashed red line, and dotted blue line denote theoretical analysis with ne0=1011, 1013, and 1015 cm−3, respectively. The pink triangles represent 3D simulation results before simulation memory overflow with ne0=1011 cm−3 [a 40 μm (x)×40 μm (y)×40 μm (z) window with 2000cells×400cells×400cells]. (b) The theoretically predicted peak intensity evolution from analytical model as a function of designed peak intensity at ne0=109 cm−3.
    Fig. 4. (a) Obtained peak intensity evolution at a=6000 for different vacuum electron densities ne0. The black circles, red pentagrams, and blue squares represent average peak intensity measured in simulations. The solid black line, dashed red line, and dotted blue line denote theoretical analysis with ne0=1011, 1013, and 1015  cm3, respectively. The pink triangles represent 3D simulation results before simulation memory overflow with ne0=1011cm3 [a 40  μm(x)×40  μm(y)×40  μm(z) window with 2000cells×400cells×400cells]. (b) The theoretically predicted peak intensity evolution from analytical model as a function of designed peak intensity at ne0=109  cm3.
    Yitong Wu, Liangliang Ji, Ruxin Li. On the upper limit of laser intensity attainable in nonideal vacuum[J]. Photonics Research, 2021, 9(4): 541
    Download Citation