Fig. 1. Principle of perspective results in inconsistent transverse overlap of image
Fig. 2. Comparison of the effect of uniform distribution of features on alignment ability
Fig. 3. Registration schematic diagram of non-uniform overlap rate
Fig. 4. Diagram of regional division
Fig. 5. Overlapping and alternating phenomenon
Fig. 6. Schematic diagram of grid transformation recursion and inter column splicing
Fig. 7. Flow chart of stitching
Fig. 8. Comparison of sequential image stitching
Fig. 9. Comparison of stitching results of single column image stitching and inter column image
Fig. 10. Far-infrared image pair for contrast experiment
Fig. 11. Comparison of registration results
Fig. 12. Influence of different distribution functions on edge distortion
Fig. 13. Comparison of gray correction map
Fig. 14. Comparison of the first far-infrared image mosaic results
Fig. 15. Comparison of the sceond far-infrared image mosaic results
Position of
grid k | Proportion of local
homography matrix
| Proportion of linearizated local
homography matrix
| Proportion of regional similarity
homography matrix
| ${x_{\min }} < {x^{(k)}} < {x_{lc}}$ | 0% | 0% | 100% | ${x_{lc}} < {x^{(k)}} < {x_l}$ | 0% -100% | 0% - 100% | 0% -100% | ${x_l} < {x^{(k)}} < {x_r}$ | 0% | 100% | 0% | ${x_r} < {x^{(k)}} < {x_{rc}}$ | 0% - 100% | 0% - 100% | 0% - 100% | ${x_{rc}} < {x^{(k)}} < {x_{\max }}$ | 0% | 0% | 100% |
|
Table 1. Weight distribution of homography matrix
Stitching method | APAP | AANAP | GSP | Ours | Stitching rows | 4 | 19 | 13 | 41 |
|
Table 2. Number comparison of multi-column image mosaic with various methods
Software | AutoStitch | PTGui | ICE | Proposed | Time | Failed | About
15 min
| About
130 min
| 7 min and
42 s
|
|
Table 3. Comparison of far-infrared image stitching speed