Author Affiliations
1 School of Materials Science and Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013 China2 School of Mechanical Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Picosecond laser processing system
Fig. 2. Schematic of picosecond laser scanning path. (a) Horizontal scanning; (b) vertical scanning; (c) repeating region of horizontal scanning route and vertical scanning route; (d) overlap region of horizontal and vertical scanning route
Fig. 3. Surface morphologies of samples under different laser fluences. (a) 0 J/cm2; (b) 1.39 J/cm2; (c) 4.95 J/cm2; (d) 6.85 J/cm2; (e) 10.21 J/cm2; (f) 12.42 J/cm2
Fig. 4. SEM images of different regions at laser fluence of 6.85 J/cm2. (a) Edge portion of pit; (b) columnar protrusion; (c) bump at bottom of pit
Fig. 5. 3D morphologies and cross-sectional profiles of as-prepared sample surfaces at laser fluence of 6.85 J/cm2. (a)(b) Overall 3D morphologies; (c)(d) local 3D morphologies; (e)(f) cross-sectional profiles
Fig. 6. Contact angle and sliding angle versus laser fluence. (a) Contact angle; (b) sliding angle
Fig. 7. Water droplets on nickle-aluminum bronze alloy surface. (a) Water droplet on polished nickel-aluminum bronze alloy surface (left) and superhydrophobic nickel-aluminum bronze alloy surface (right); (b) water droplets on nickel-aluminum bronze alloy surface with a sliding angle of 90°; (c)-(e) dynamic decomposition diagram of water droplet contacting with superhydrophobic nickel-aluminum bronze alloy surface
Fig. 8. SEM images of sample surfaces under different processing conditions. (a) Polished sample surface; (b) sample surface modified with stearic acid after polishing; (c) picosecond-laser-processed surface at laser fluence of 6.85 J/cm2; (d) stearic acid modified sample surface processed by picosecond laser at laser fluence of 6.85 J/cm 2
Fig. 9. XRD plots of superhydrophobic nickel-aluminum bronze alloy surfaces
Fig. 10. Polarization curves of different samples
Fig. 11. Contact angle and sliding angle versus time
Parameter | Pulseduration /ps | Wavelength /nm | Repetitionrate /kHz | Repeattime | Scanninginterval /μm | Spotsize /μm | Scanningspeed /(mm·s-1) |
---|
Value | 10 | 1064 | 500 | 5 | 30 | 30 | 200 |
|
Table 1. Laser processing parameters
Treatment stage | Mass fraction /% |
---|
C | O | Al | Mn | Fe | Ni | Cu |
---|
Blank sample | — | — | 7.97 | 3.18 | 5.15 | 5.34 | 78.36 | Modified blank sample | 16.98 | 1.17 | 6.17 | 2.02 | 4.39 | 3.61 | 65.66 | Laser ablated sample | 1.98 | 2.50 | 5.87 | 3.03 | 5.69 | 4.96 | 75.97 | Modified laser ablated sample | 11.04 | 2.64 | 4.46 | 2.99 | 5.39 | 5.15 | 68.33 |
|
Table 2. EDS of nickel-aluminum bronze alloy surfaces at different treatment stages