Author Affiliations
1School of Energy and Power Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China2Shanghai Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow and Heat Transfer in Power Engineering, Shanghai 200093, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Light field schematic. (a) Diagram of light field biplane parameterization; (b) refocusing schematic
Fig. 2. Schematics of light transmission sampling of two plenoptic cameras. (a) Unfocused plenoptic camera;(b) focused plenoptic camera
Fig. 3. Refocusing images. (a) Focus on far; (b) focus on near
Fig. 4. Simplified diagram of light transmission of focused plenoptic camera
Fig. 5. Raw light field image and all-in-focus image. (a) Partial enlarged raw light field image; (b) all-in-focus image
Fig. 6. Diagram of experiment device for calibration
Fig. 7. Curve of refocusing coefficient-sharpness
Fig. 8. Results of depth calibration. (a) 7 points; (b) 9 points
Fig. 9. Reprojection error. (a) Corners error; (b) average reprojection error
Fig. 10. Flow chart of particle tracking
Fig. 11. Simplified flow chart of light field PTV technology
Fig. 12. Schematic of experimental system. (a) Experimental device; (b) measuring area
Fig. 13. Tracking results of two adjacent frame particles. (a) Velocity slices in z direction; (b) velocity slices in y direction; (c) angular velocity
Method | Mean absolute difference /mm |
---|
7 points | 9 points | 46 points |
---|
Method 1 | 0.0543 | 0.0486 | 0.0479 | Method 2(polynomial of order 3) | 0.0528 | 0.0532 | 0.0504 | Method 2(polynomial of order 5) | 0.2084 | 0.0262 | 0.0202 |
|
Table 1. E of different depth calibration methods