• Chinese Optics Letters
  • Vol. 19, Issue 10, 103201 (2021)
Hao Guo1、2, Xiang Dong3, Tie-Jun Wang1、2、*, Xuan Zhang1, Na Chen1, Fukang Yin1、2, Yihai Wang1、4, Lingang Zhang1, Haiyi Sun1, Jun Liu1、2, Jiansheng Liu5, Baifei Shen5, Olga Kosareva6, Yuxin Leng1、2, and Ruxin Li1、2
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of High Field Laser Physics and CAS Center for Excellence in Ultra-intense Laser Science, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
  • 2Center of Materials Science and Optoelectronics Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 3Department of Physics, College of Arts and Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
  • 4College of Physics, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
  • 5Department of Physics, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China
  • 6Physics Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/COL202119.103201 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Hao Guo, Xiang Dong, Tie-Jun Wang, Xuan Zhang, Na Chen, Fukang Yin, Yihai Wang, Lingang Zhang, Haiyi Sun, Jun Liu, Jiansheng Liu, Baifei Shen, Olga Kosareva, Yuxin Leng, Ruxin Li. Polarization dependent clamping intensity inside a femtosecond filament in air[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2021, 19(10): 103201 Copy Citation Text show less
    Experimental setup. The inset shows a typical picture of a filament-drilled pinhole.
    Fig. 1. Experimental setup. The inset shows a typical picture of a filament-drilled pinhole.
    (a) Side fluorescence images of filaments in LP and CP with f = 30 cm focusing lens. The images were accumulated for 40 shots. (b) The diameters of the laser filament-drilled (f = 30 cm) Al foil pinholes as a function of the number of the laser shots. The laser energy was 1 mJ. (c) Measured laser fluence distribution along the LP or CP filaments (f = 30 cm). The solid curves are polynomial fits as a guide for the eye. The radius of the pinhole was approximately 42.3 µm. The position “0” corresponds to the geometry focus (f = 30 cm), while the positive values indicate the positions prior to the geometry focus. (d) Measured laser fluence with f = 30 cm focusing lens as a function of the input laser energy at LP (ellipticity of zero). (e) Clamping laser fluence inside the filament core versus different initial laser polarization ellipticities under the external focusing conditions of f = 30 cm and f = 100 cm, respectively. (f) Laser spectra measured after filamentation.
    Fig. 2. (a) Side fluorescence images of filaments in LP and CP with f = 30 cm focusing lens. The images were accumulated for 40 shots. (b) The diameters of the laser filament-drilled (f = 30 cm) Al foil pinholes as a function of the number of the laser shots. The laser energy was 1 mJ. (c) Measured laser fluence distribution along the LP or CP filaments (f = 30 cm). The solid curves are polynomial fits as a guide for the eye. The radius of the pinhole was approximately 42.3 µm. The position “0” corresponds to the geometry focus (f = 30 cm), while the positive values indicate the positions prior to the geometry focus. (d) Measured laser fluence with f = 30 cm focusing lens as a function of the input laser energy at LP (ellipticity of zero). (e) Clamping laser fluence inside the filament core versus different initial laser polarization ellipticities under the external focusing conditions of f = 30 cm and f = 100 cm, respectively. (f) Laser spectra measured after filamentation.
    (a) Peak intensity as a function of propagation distances. The focal length is 30 cm unless it is stated. (b) Laser energy confined in the range of r42.1 μm as a function of propagation distance. (c) The beam sizes (fluence at FWHM) as a function of propagation distances. The vertical dot line indicates the propagation distance (z=0.57 cm), where the maximum intensity during the propagation is obtained in the CP case. In the LP case, the maximum intensity is obtained at z=0.59 cm. (d) Simulated clamping intensity versus the initial laser polarization ellipticity under external focusing conditions of f=30 cm, 50 cm, and 100 cm, respectively.
    Fig. 3. (a) Peak intensity as a function of propagation distances. The focal length is 30 cm unless it is stated. (b) Laser energy confined in the range of r<42.1μm as a function of propagation distance. (c) The beam sizes (fluence at FWHM) as a function of propagation distances. The vertical dot line indicates the propagation distance (z=0.57cm), where the maximum intensity during the propagation is obtained in the CP case. In the LP case, the maximum intensity is obtained at z=0.59cm. (d) Simulated clamping intensity versus the initial laser polarization ellipticity under external focusing conditions of f=30cm, 50 cm, and 100 cm, respectively.
    Hao Guo, Xiang Dong, Tie-Jun Wang, Xuan Zhang, Na Chen, Fukang Yin, Yihai Wang, Lingang Zhang, Haiyi Sun, Jun Liu, Jiansheng Liu, Baifei Shen, Olga Kosareva, Yuxin Leng, Ruxin Li. Polarization dependent clamping intensity inside a femtosecond filament in air[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2021, 19(10): 103201
    Download Citation