• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 38, Issue 4, 0401002 (2018)
Junchi Liu*, Hongwen Li*, Limei Yin, and Hongzhuang Li
Author Affiliations
  • Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, Jilin 130039, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS201838.0401002 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Junchi Liu, Hongwen Li, Limei Yin, Hongzhuang Li. Equivalent Emissivity Inversion Method for Infrared Filters in Cutoff Band[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2018, 38(4): 0401002 Copy Citation Text show less
    Diagram of radiation calibration light path without infrared filter
    Fig. 1. Diagram of radiation calibration light path without infrared filter
    Diagram of radiation calibration light path with infrared filter
    Fig. 2. Diagram of radiation calibration light path with infrared filter
    Schematic of self radiation determination principle for infrared filter in cutoff band
    Fig. 3. Schematic of self radiation determination principle for infrared filter in cutoff band
    Radiation model from limited surface source to micro surface source
    Fig. 4. Radiation model from limited surface source to micro surface source
    Normalized spectral radiation responsivity of medium wave infrared detector
    Fig. 5. Normalized spectral radiation responsivity of medium wave infrared detector
    Radiation calibration results without infrared filter (integration time is 0.8 ms). (a) Radiation responsivity; (b) gray value bias
    Fig. 6. Radiation calibration results without infrared filter (integration time is 0.8 ms). (a) Radiation responsivity; (b) gray value bias
    Radiation calibration results with infrared filter (integration time is 0.8 ms). (a) Radiation responsivity; (b) gray value bias
    Fig. 7. Radiation calibration results with infrared filter (integration time is 0.8 ms). (a) Radiation responsivity; (b) gray value bias
    Difference of radiation calibration results (integration time is 0.8 ms). (a) Relative difference of radiation responsivity; (b) absolute difference of gray value bias
    Fig. 8. Difference of radiation calibration results (integration time is 0.8 ms). (a) Relative difference of radiation responsivity; (b) absolute difference of gray value bias
    Radiation calibration results without infrared filter (integration time is 4.0 ms). (a) Radiation responsivity; (b) gray value bias
    Fig. 9. Radiation calibration results without infrared filter (integration time is 4.0 ms). (a) Radiation responsivity; (b) gray value bias
    Radiation calibration results with infrared filter (integration time is 4.0 ms). (a) Radiation responsivity; (b) gray value bias
    Fig. 10. Radiation calibration results with infrared filter (integration time is 4.0 ms). (a) Radiation responsivity; (b) gray value bias
    Difference of radiation calibration results (integration time is 4.0 ms). (a) Relative difference of radiation responsivity; (b) absolute difference of gray value bias
    Fig. 11. Difference of radiation calibration results (integration time is 4.0 ms). (a) Relative difference of radiation responsivity; (b) absolute difference of gray value bias
    Diagram of reflection imaging light path (angle between infrared filter and optical axis is 45°)
    Fig. 12. Diagram of reflection imaging light path (angle between infrared filter and optical axis is 45°)
    Reflection imaging effect (angle between infrared filter and optical axis is 45°)
    Fig. 13. Reflection imaging effect (angle between infrared filter and optical axis is 45°)
    Diagram of reflection imaging light path (filter is perpendicular to optical axis)
    Fig. 14. Diagram of reflection imaging light path (filter is perpendicular to optical axis)
    Reflection imaging effect (filter is perpendicular to optical axis). (a) Lens surface; (b) Dewar window
    Fig. 15. Reflection imaging effect (filter is perpendicular to optical axis). (a) Lens surface; (b) Dewar window
    ParameterValue
    Response band of detector /μm3.6-5.0
    Resolution of detector /pixel×pixel320×256
    Pixel size of detector /μm30
    F number of cold stop2
    Integration time /ms0.8, 4.0
    Transmission band of filter /μm3.6-4.2
    Distance from filter to window /mm10
    Distance from window to FPA /mm23.75
    Temperature of filter /℃23
    Emissivity of black body0.95
    Table 1. Parameters of experiment
    Junchi Liu, Hongwen Li, Limei Yin, Hongzhuang Li. Equivalent Emissivity Inversion Method for Infrared Filters in Cutoff Band[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2018, 38(4): 0401002
    Download Citation