• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 38, Issue 12, 1210002 (2018)
Yiming Xiong*, Feng Shao*, and Xiangchao Meng
Author Affiliations
  • Faculty of Information Science and Engineering, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315211, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS201838.1210002 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yiming Xiong, Feng Shao, Xiangchao Meng. Sparse Representation-Based Full-Reference Quality Assessment of Distorted Satellite Stereo Images[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2018, 38(12): 1210002 Copy Citation Text show less
    Left images of the original satellite stereo images in the database
    Fig. 1. Left images of the original satellite stereo images in the database
    Block diagram of building detection
    Fig. 2. Block diagram of building detection
    Original left image of building detection. (a) Corner detection results of original image; (b) DSM corresponding to Fig. (a); (c) building detection results
    Fig. 3. Original left image of building detection. (a) Corner detection results of original image; (b) DSM corresponding to Fig. (a); (c) building detection results
    Building detection in some areas. (a) Corner detection results; (b) DSM corresponding to Fig. (a); (c) building test results
    Fig. 4. Building detection in some areas. (a) Corner detection results; (b) DSM corresponding to Fig. (a); (c) building test results
    Building detection results. (a) Original image; (b) blur distortion image; (c) noise distortion image; (d) building detection of original image; (e) building detection result after blur distortion; (f) building detection result after noise distortion
    Fig. 5. Building detection results. (a) Original image; (b) blur distortion image; (c) noise distortion image; (d) building detection of original image; (e) building detection result after blur distortion; (f) building detection result after noise distortion
    Building detection results. (a) Building detection results of original image; (b) building detection results after blur distortion; (c) building detection results after noise distortion
    Fig. 6. Building detection results. (a) Building detection results of original image; (b) building detection results after blur distortion; (c) building detection results after noise distortion
    Histogram of detection accuracy in the database
    Fig. 7. Histogram of detection accuracy in the database
    Block diagram of objective quality evaluation. (a) Feature extraction; (b) sparse representation-based similarity measure
    Fig. 8. Block diagram of objective quality evaluation. (a) Feature extraction; (b) sparse representation-based similarity measure
    SIFT features extraction. (a) SIFT features extraction of the original image; (b) SIFT features extraction of distorted image
    Fig. 9. SIFT features extraction. (a) SIFT features extraction of the original image; (b) SIFT features extraction of distorted image
    Scatter plots of evaluation prediction values and detection accuracy rates obtained by different evaluation methods. (a) MS-SSIM; (b) SSIM; (c) IFC; (d) VIF; (e) model in Ref.[27]; (f) FSIM; (g) GSM; (h) model in Ref.[29]; (i) proposed method
    Fig. 10. Scatter plots of evaluation prediction values and detection accuracy rates obtained by different evaluation methods. (a) MS-SSIM; (b) SSIM; (c) IFC; (d) VIF; (e) model in Ref.[27]; (f) FSIM; (g) GSM; (h) model in Ref.[29]; (i) proposed method
    CriteriaQSSIFTQOSIFTQSBRISKQOBRISKQf
    PLCC0.82130.72030.82040.84690.9013
    SROCC0.79510.70480.80240.80240.8772
    KROCC0.59760.52790.57550.60650.7043
    RMSE6.64058.23126.72876.36885.0103
    Table 1. Performance comparison of individual quality values
    ModelPLCCSROCCKROCCRMSE
    MS-SSIM0.81460.79380.62886.9891
    SSIM0.65510.61350.43118.8133
    IFC0.82850.81540.67056.6789
    VIF0.88900.87220.68396.3872
    Model in Ref.[27]0.79290.74450.54777.0585
    FSIM0.69710.66230.47358.2684
    Model in Ref.[29]0.68910.67500.48308.4530
    GSM0.66100.69160.49878.6132
    Proposed0.90130.87720.70435.0103
    Table 2. Comparison of overall performance of different evaluation methods
    DistortionModel
    MS-SSIMSSIMIFCVIFModel in Ref.[27]FSIMModel in Ref.[29]GSMProposed
    Gblur0.86240.66510.83420.91520.83740.64940.64750.70130.8901
    WN0.86170.53210.83600.88230.76320.58360.59520.55790.9272
    Table 3. PLCC values of different distortion types
    DistortionModel
    MS-SSIMSSIMIFCVIFModel in Ref.[27]FSIMModel in Ref.[29]GSMProposed
    Gblur0.93840.70790.87140.86290.77740.70740.71470.73840.8567
    WN0.89670.67190.84630.85130.75770.68240.69040.70130.9076
    Table 4. SROCC values of different distortion types
    Yiming Xiong, Feng Shao, Xiangchao Meng. Sparse Representation-Based Full-Reference Quality Assessment of Distorted Satellite Stereo Images[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2018, 38(12): 1210002
    Download Citation