Author Affiliations
1National Engineering Research Center for Mechanical Product Remanufacturing, Army Academy of Armored Forces, Beijing 100072, China2Laboratory on Remanufacturing, Army Academy of Armored Forces, Beijing 100072, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Schematic of optical fiber laser cleaning device
Fig. 2. Cleaning method of paint
Fig. 3. Three-dimensional morphology of cleaning surface after laser cleaning once with different energy densities. (a) 7.32 J/cm2; (b) 8.37 J/cm2; (c) 9.42 J/cm2; (d) 10.46 J/cm2; (e) 11.51 J/cm2; (f) 12.56 J/cm2; (g) 13.60 J/cm2; (h) 14.65 J/cm2
Fig. 4. Three-dimensional morphology of cleaning surface after laser cleaning twice at different energy densities. (a)-(c) 7.32 J/cm2; (d)-(f) 9.42 J/cm2; (g)-(i) 11.51 J/cm2; (j)-(l) 13.60 J/cm2
Fig. 5. SEM images of laser cleaning surface with different energy densities. (a)(e) 11.51 J/cm2; (b) 14.65 J/cm2; (c) 7.32 J/cm2; (d) 9.42 J/cm2; (f) 13.60 J/cm2
Fig. 6. Binding energy spectra for the constituent elements after cleaning twice with energy density of 9.42 J/cm2. (a) C 1s; (b) O 1s; (c) Al 2p; (d) Ti 2p
Fig. 7. Schematic of mechanism of paint removal with laser
Energy density /(J·cm-2) | 7.32 | 8.37 | 9.42 | 10.46 | 11.51 | 12.56 | 13.60 | 14.65 |
---|
Surface roughness Ra /μm | 3.422 | 3.239 | 2.976 | 2.897 | 1.205 | 1.557 | 1.615 | 1.656 |
|
Table 1. Surface roughness of cleaning surface after laser cleaning once with different energy densities
Energy density /(J·cm-2) | 7.32 | 8.37 | 9.42 | 10.46 | 11.51 | 12.56 | 13.60 | 14.65 |
---|
Surface roughness Ra /μm | 4.196 | 2.584 | 1.476 | 1.426 | 1.498 | 1.828 | 2.219 | 2.513 |
|
Table 2. Surface roughness of cleaning surface after laser cleaning twice with different energy densities
Different area | Atomic number fraction /% |
---|
C | O | Al | Ti | Si |
---|
Original paint | Surface | 68.17 | 30.93 | 0.12 | 0.46 | 0.31 | | A | 14.98 | 8.95 | 75.70 | 0.21 | 0.16 | | B | 17.03 | 17.89 | 64.78 | 0.11 | 0.19 | Fig. 5(c) | C | 18.31 | 15.36 | 66.04 | 0.16 | 0.14 | | D | 10.21 | 60.55 | 29.02 | 0.17 | 0.05 | | E | 61.33 | 33.78 | 1.80 | 1.97 | 1.12 | | A | 17.05 | 8.62 | 74.17 | 0.06 | 0.10 | Fig. 5(d) | B | 17.71 | 15.96 | 66.04 | 0.16 | 0.14 | | C | 22.45 | 12.50 | 64.57 | 0.18 | 0.31 | | A | 20.22 | 7.21 | 72.40 | 0.05 | 0.13 | Fig. 5(e) | B | 22.04 | 14.01 | 63.71 | 0.11 | 0.12 | | C | 24.29 | 11.36 | 63.93 | 0.17 | 0.26 | | A | 21.26 | 6.55 | 72.06 | 0.04 | 0.09 | Fig. 5(f) | B | 23.45 | 11.42 | 65.00 | 0.06 | 0.07 | | C | 28.92 | 11.17 | 59.66 | 0.06 | 0.18 |
|
Table 3. EDS results of cleaning surface after laser cleaning twice with different energy densities
Element | Binding energy /eV | Binding mode |
---|
| 283.44 | SiC,Al/SiC,SiC/(SiO2+SiC) | C 1s | 284.00 | C60/Al | | 284.90 | C | | 287.42 | C—C、C
O
| | 529.36 | TiO2,SiO2 | | 529.96 | TiO2,Al2O3 | | 530.43 | SiO2,TiO2 | O 1s | 530.82 | Al2O3,Al2TiO5,TiO2,TiO,AlOOH | | 531.22 | Al2O3,AlOOH,MgAl2.3O4.8/SiO2,MgAl2O4,MgO | | 531.84 | Al2SiO5,Al3N5O3Si3,Mg3H2(SiO3)4,Al2OSiO4 | | 532.55 | SiO2,SiO1.9,SiO2/Si,O—C,C
O
| | 73.00 | Al2O3/Al,Al/O2,Al/Al2O3,Al/AlOx | | 73.64 | Al2O3,Al4C3 | Al 2p | 74.31 | MgAl2.2O4.75,Al2O3,SiO2(Al2O3)0.22,MgAl2.7O5.3/SiO2Al(OH)3 | | 74.58 | Al2OSiO4,MgAl2O5,MgAl2.2O4.9,Al2O3,SiO2(Al2O3)0.55,AlOOH | | 75.28 | O2/Al | | 453.71 | AlTi | | 454.91 | TiN,TiN/SiO2 | | 457.28 | TiS2 | Ti 2p | 457.60 | TiN,TiOS | | 458.68 | TiO2,Al2TiO5 | | 462.42 | TiOS | | 464.14 | TiO2 |
|
Table 4. Binding mode of C, O, Al, and Ti on the cleaning surface after laser cleaning twice with energy density of 9.42 J/cm2