• Journal of Semiconductors
  • Vol. 43, Issue 10, 100201 (2022)
Baoze Liu1, Lixiu Zhang2, Yan Jiang1、*, and Liming Ding2、**
Author Affiliations
  • 1Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory, Dongguan 523808, China
  • 2Center for Excellence in Nanoscience (CAS), Key Laboratory of Nanosystem and Hierarchical Fabrication (CAS), National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing 100190, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/43/10/100201 Cite this Article
    Baoze Liu, Lixiu Zhang, Yan Jiang, Liming Ding. Failure pathways of perovskite solar cells in space[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2022, 43(10): 100201 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    When cosmic rays (e.g. protons) passing through the atmosphere at low earth orbit (LEO) or spacecraft shielding, a certain amount of neutrons are created. Cacialliet al. reported that fast neutrons (energy ≥ 1 MeV) interact with perovskite, causing atomic displacement[9], which induces Frenkel defects. These defects acted as unintentional dopants, increasing open-circuit voltage (Voc) and reducing leakage current. Noticeably, unlike light-induced degradation, fast neutron-induced degradation is permanent and irreversible.

    In space, the solar spectrum becomes AM0, which comprises additional UV irradiation than AM1.5. Generally, water and oxygen could participate in the degradation of perovskites under UV light[15]. Recently, Liet al. indicated that the stability of PSCs with a TiO2 layer was affected by UV light even in inert environment. The UV-induced degradation pathway is described inFig. 2(c)[16]. Under UV light, Ti3+-VO (oxygen vacancy) reacts with the photogenerated holes and transforms to active Ti4+-VO trap states, leading to a loss of photocarriers. Ti4+-VO oxidizes I and produces I3. I3 species further accelerate the decomposition of perovskite[17]. Al2O3, Zn2SnO4, ZnTiO3 and NiOx serving as photocatalysts may follow a similar degradation mechanism.

    (Color online) (a) Perovskite solar cells in space suffer various radiations. (b) Simulated electron diffraction patterns showing the structural evolution of MAPbI3 under e-beam irradiation. Reproduced with permission[2], Copyright 2018, Springer Nature. (c) Transmittance spectra for glass substrates after e-beam irradiation. Reproduced with permission[3], Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society. (d)β coefficientvsVoc curves. Reproduced with permission[7], Copyright 2017, Wiley.

    Figure 1.(Color online) (a) Perovskite solar cells in space suffer various radiations. (b) Simulated electron diffraction patterns showing the structural evolution of MAPbI3 under e-beam irradiation. Reproduced with permission[2], Copyright 2018, Springer Nature. (c) Transmittance spectra for glass substrates after e-beam irradiation. Reproduced with permission[3], Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society. (d)β coefficientvsVoc curves. Reproduced with permission[7], Copyright 2017, Wiley.

    PSCs demonstrate superior stability than silicon solar cells under cosmic rays, but they are certainly not indestructible. Some degradation mechanisms are proposed and more are yet to be explored.

    By using 1486 eV X-ray to radiate MAPbI3, the perovskite surface was damaged, causing the formation of crystalline PbI2 and the evaporation of NH3I[13]. Cappelet al. indicated that different perovskites followed different decomposition modes under strong X-ray irradiation. For CsPbBr3, X-rays caused the formation of metallic Pb, CsBr and Br2, evidenced by a significant decrease in bromine content (Fig. 2(b)). For Cs0.17FA0.83PbI3, X-rays caused the degradation of FA+, yielding a Pb/I ratio of 1 : 2 but without the formation of metallic Pb[14].

    Compared with electrons, protons have a higher mass and may cause severe damage. So far, the influence of proton irradiation has been studied mostly on unencapsulated PSCs under low-energy proton irradiation (50 or 150 keV) and encapsulated PSCs under high-energy irradiation (20 and 68 MeV). Low-energy protons could induce more damage because most of them stop in the device interior, while high-energy protons pass through the device[5]. Nickelet al. studied the irradiation hardness of MAPbI3 PSCs under 68 MeV proton irradiation with a total dose of 1.02 × 1013 p/cm2. The device performance unexpectedly increased after irradiation, which was attributed to the reduced SRH recombination loss (Fig. 1(d))[7]. They speculated that the proton-doping-induced shallow energy-level defects compensated the impact of MA-escape-induced deep energy-level defects. In their subsequent study, they conducted proton irradiation test on Cs0.05MA0.17FA0.83Pb(I0.83Br0.17)3 PSCs under the same condition. The photoluminescence (PL) decay curves indicated that the carrier lifetime was prolonged after 68 MeV proton irradiation. A kinetic model, in which the trap states induced by proton irradiation slowly release the trapped minority carriers, could perfectly fit the experimental results[8].

    High power-to-weight ratio, good radiation resistance, and low manufacturing cost enable perovskite solar cells (PSCs) to be possibly used in space[1]. Different from terrestrial applications, PSCs used in space will face cosmic radiation, e.g., electrons, protons, neutrons, gamma rays, X-rays, ultraviolet (UV) rays, etc. (Fig. 1(a)), harming their long-term operational stability. Electrons are the most common high-energy particles in space. A series of terrestrial experiments mimicking electrons in the space environment were carried out, showing that PSCs can be deteriorated upon exposure. Al-Jassimet al. elucidated two failure pathways for perovskite films under electron-beam (e-beam) exposure through cathodoluminescence (CL) signals variation, which are knock-on-induced defect formation and heat-induced phase transformation[2]. Gaoet al. revealed the decomposition process of MAPbI3 under e-beam exposure by in-situ TEM[3]. The structural change was initiated by the loss of I ions to form MAPbI2.5, followed by the loss of MA ions to form MAyPbI2.5–z, and ended up with PbI2 (Fig. 1(b)). Yanet al. observed severe short-circuit current density (Jsc) decrease after electron exposure, which was mainly attributed to the reduced substrate transmittance caused by glass “coloring” (Fig. 1(c))[4]. Similar phenomenon was also observed when soda-lime glass was irradiated by protons[5] and gamma rays[6], thus the irradiation tolerance of space-used substrate is demanded.

    (Color online) (a) Schematic for self-healing mechanism in MAPbI3. Reproduced with permission[12], Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society. (b) Cs 4d, Br 3d, Pb 5d XPS spectra for CsPbBr3. Reproduced with permission[14], Copyright 2021, Royal Society of Chemistry. (c) Schematic for UV-induced degradation of perovskite. Reproduced with permission[16], Copyright 2021, Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Figure 2.(Color online) (a) Schematic for self-healing mechanism in MAPbI3. Reproduced with permission[12], Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society. (b) Cs 4d, Br 3d, Pb 5d XPS spectra for CsPbBr3. Reproduced with permission[14], Copyright 2021, Royal Society of Chemistry. (c) Schematic for UV-induced degradation of perovskite. Reproduced with permission[16], Copyright 2021, Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Gamma rays, with energy from a few keV to ~8 MeV, have the strongest energy in the electromagnetic spectrum and the highest penetrating ability. Huanget al. used gamma rays of 0.42 rad/s to irradiate Cs0.05FA0.81MA0.14PbI2.55Br0.45 solar cells[6]. The power conversion efficiency (PCE) decreased to 85% of the initial value after first 2 h, declined slowly between 2–100 h, and kept stable between 100–1410 h. The initial PCE attenuation was attributed to ion displacement in the perovskite. Then, ions slowly returned to their original lattice positions, leading to the recovery of PCE. Yanget al. irradiated FA0.945MA0.025Cs0.03Pb(I0.975Br0.025)3 PSCs at a higher intensity (50 rad/s) and observed the formation of δ-phase FAPbI3[10]. Troshin et al. irradiated perovskite by using gamma rays of 4.2 rad/s with an accumulated dose up to 50 krad. PL spectra exhibited an increase in peak intensity and a red shift in peak position. They thought that gamma rays promote phase segregationvia forming I-rich and Br-rich domains[11]. By excluding the influence of glass, they compared the stability of different perovskites upon gamma rays irradiation. MAPbI3 presented the highest stability because of its unique self-healing nature (Fig. 2(a)). At the surface, MAPbI3 can easily decompose into CH3I, NH3 and PbI2. Under gamma rays irradiation, radicals of the volatile species will form and react to form MAI again, which will further react with PbI2 to form MAPbI3[12].

    Acknowledgements

    Y. Jiang thanks the support from the Energy Materials and Optoelectronics Unit of Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory (Y0D1121E311). L. Ding thanks the open research fund of Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory (2021SLABFK02), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFA0206600), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51922032, 21961160720).

    References

    [1] J Yang, Q Bao, L Shen et al. Potential applications for perovskite solar cells in space. Nano Energy, 76, 105019(2020).

    [2] C Xiao, Z Li, H Guthrey et al. Mechanisms of electron-beam-induced damage in perovskite thin films revealed by cathodoluminescence spectroscopy. J Phys Chem C, 48, 2690(2015).

    [3] S Chen, X Zhang, J Zhao et al. Atomic scale insights into structure instability and decomposition pathway of methylammonium lead iodide perovskite. Nat Commun, 9, 1(2018).

    [4] Z Song, C Li, C Chen et al. High remaining factors in the photovoltaic performance of perovskite solar cells after high-fluence electron beam irradiations. J Phys Chem C, 2, 1330(2019).

    [5] Y Miyazawa, M Ikegami, T Miyasaka et al. Evaluation of radiation tolerance of perovskite solar cell for use in space. 2015 IEEE 42nd Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC)(2015).

    [6] S Yang, Z Xu, S Xue et al. Organohalide lead perovskites: more stable than glass under gamma-ray radiation. Adv Mater, 31, 1805547(2019).

    [7] V V Brus, F Lang, J Bundesmann et al. Defect dynamics in proton irradiated CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells. Adv Electron Mater, 3, 1600438(2017).

    [8] F Lang, M Jošt, J Bundesmann et al. Efficient minority carrier detrapping mediating the radiation hardness of triple-cation perovskite solar cells under proton irradiation. Energy Environ Sci, 12, 1634(2019).

    [9] G Paternò, V Robbiano, L Santarelli et al. Perovskite solar cell resilience to fast neutrons. Sustain Energy Fuels, 3, 2561(2019).

    [10] K Yang, K Huang, X Li et al. Radiation tolerance of perovskite solar cells under gamma ray. Org Electron, 71, 79(2019).

    [11] A G Boldyreva, A F Akbulatov, S A Tsarev et al. γ-ray-induced degradation in the triple-cation perovskite solar cells. J Phys Chem C, 10, 813(2019).

    [12] A G Boldyreva, L A Frolova, I S Zhidkov et al. Unravelling the material composition effects on the gamma ray stability of lead halide perovskite solar cells: MAPbI3 breaks the records. J Phys Chem Lett, 11, 2630(2020).

    [13] K Motoki, Y Miyazawa, D Kobayashi et al. Degradation of CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite due to soft X-ray irradiation as analyzed by an X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy time-dependent measurement method. J Appl Phys, 121, 085501(2017).

    [14] S Svanström, A G Fernández, T Sloboda et al. X-ray stability and degradation mechanism of lead halide perovskites and lead halides. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 23, 12479(2021).

    [15] T Leijtens, G E Eperon, S Pathak et al. Overcoming ultraviolet light instability of sensitized TiO2 with meso-superstructured organometal tri-halide perovskite solar cells. Nat Commun, 4, 1(2013).

    [16] J Ji, X Liu, H Jiang et al. Two-stage ultraviolet degradation of perovskite solar cells induced by the oxygen vacancy-Ti4+ states. Iscience, 23, 101013(2020).

    [17] S Wang, Y Jiang, E J Juarez-perez et al. Accelerated degradation of methylammonium lead iodide perovskites induced by exposure to iodine vapour. Nat Energy, 2, 1(2016).

    Baoze Liu, Lixiu Zhang, Yan Jiang, Liming Ding. Failure pathways of perovskite solar cells in space[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2022, 43(10): 100201
    Download Citation