• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 55, Issue 2, 021007 (2018)
Yuemei Ma1, Haiying Chen1、2, and Guojun Liu、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1 School of Mathematics and Statistics, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, Ningxia 750021, China
  • 1 School of Preparatory Education for Nationalities, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, Ningxia 750021, China
  • 2 School of Mathematics and Statistics, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP55.021007 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yuemei Ma, Haiying Chen, Guojun Liu. General Mean Pooling Strategy for Color Image Quality Assessment[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2018, 55(2): 021007 Copy Citation Text show less
    Reference image and distorted images of varying degrees in TID2013 database. (a) Reference image; (b) distorted image (EMSE=76.54, RPSNR=29.29); (c) distorted image (EMSE=0.88, RPSNR=48.68)
    Fig. 1. Reference image and distorted images of varying degrees in TID2013 database. (a) Reference image; (b) distorted image (EMSE=76.54, RPSNR=29.29); (c) distorted image (EMSE=0.88, RPSNR=48.68)
    SROCC curves varying with r. (a) General mean pooling strategy 1; (b) general mean pooling strategy 2
    Fig. 2. SROCC curves varying with r. (a) General mean pooling strategy 1; (b) general mean pooling strategy 2
    SROCC mesh graphs varying with ω. (a) Variation in SROCC of GM-C-SSIM2 with ω2 and ω3; (b) variation in SROCC of GM-C-GSSIM2 with ω2 and ω3; (c) variation in SROCC of GM-C-FSIM2 with ω1 and ω2
    Fig. 3. SROCC mesh graphs varying with ω. (a) Variation in SROCC of GM-C-SSIM2 with ω2 and ω3; (b) variation in SROCC of GM-C-GSSIM2 with ω2 and ω3; (c) variation in SROCC of GM-C-FSIM2 with ω1 and ω2
    Scatter plots between objective scores and MOS of each evaluation algorithm in TID2013 database. (a) C-SSIM; (b) C-GSSIM; (c) C-FSIM; (d) GM-C-SSIM1; (e) GM-C-GSSIM1; (f) GM-C-FSIM1; (g) GM-C-SSIM2; (h) GM-C-GSSIM2; (i) GM-C-FSIM2
    Fig. 4. Scatter plots between objective scores and MOS of each evaluation algorithm in TID2013 database. (a) C-SSIM; (b) C-GSSIM; (c) C-FSIM; (d) GM-C-SSIM1; (e) GM-C-GSSIM1; (f) GM-C-FSIM1; (g) GM-C-SSIM2; (h) GM-C-GSSIM2; (i) GM-C-FSIM2
    AlgorithmSROCCKROCCPLCCRMSE
    SSIM[3]0.74170.55880.78950.7608
    C-SSIM0.81150.62030.82210.7058
    GM-SSIM1[14]0.76650.58690.80930.7283
    GM-SSIM2[14]0.78250.58850.80210.7404
    GM-C-SSIM10.85090.65960.85270.6475
    GM-C-SSIM20.85610.66890.85260.6478
    GSSIM[4]0.75860.57680.81790.7132
    C-GSSIM0.85080.66250.86290.6266
    GM-GSSIM1[14]0.79190.61150.85150.6500
    GM-GSSIM2[14]0.74660.55730.79680.7491
    GM-C-GSSIM10.87080.68450.88000.5889
    GM-C-GSSIM20.87480.69370.89110.5626
    FSIM[5]0.80150.62890.85890.6349
    C-FSIM[5]0.85100.66650.87690.5959
    GM-FSIM1[14]0.81570.64390.86900.6133
    GM-FSIM2[14]0.81370.63990.86490.6223
    GM-C-FSIM10.86130.67830.88340.5810
    GM-C-FSIM20.88410.69750.89330.5571
    Table 1. Performance comparison of IQA in TID2013 database
    Yuemei Ma, Haiying Chen, Guojun Liu. General Mean Pooling Strategy for Color Image Quality Assessment[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2018, 55(2): 021007
    Download Citation