High stability PGC demodulation technique for fiber-optic interferometric sensor

Wenzhe Xiao; Jing Cheng; Dawei Zhang; Yong Kong; Hualong Ye; Jun He

doi:10.12086/oee.2022.210368

Journals >Opto-Electronic Engineering >Volume 49 >Issue 3 >Page 210368-1 > Article

Opto-Electronic Engineering
Vol. 49, Issue 3, 210368-1 (2022)

High stability PGC demodulation technique for fiber-optic interferometric sensor

Wenzhe Xiao¹, Jing Cheng², Dawei Zhang^1、*, Yong Kong³, Hualong Ye¹, and Jun He¹

Author Affiliations

¹School of Optical Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China

²Department of Materials Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China

³School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China

show less

DOI: 10.12086/oee.2022.210368 Cite this Article

Wenzhe Xiao, Jing Cheng, Dawei Zhang, Yong Kong, Hualong Ye, Jun He. High stability PGC demodulation technique for fiber-optic interferometric sensor[J]. Opto-Electronic Engineering, 2022, 49(3): 210368-1 Copy Citation Text

show less

Fig. 1. Schematics of the PGC demodulation algorithm. (a) PGC-Arctan; (b) PGC-DCM; (c) PGC-SDD; (d) PGC-SDD-DSM

Download full size | View in the Article

Demodulation signals of different PGC demodulation algorithms with C=1.5 rad, 2.0 rad, 2.5 rad, 3.0 rad and 3.5 rad. (a) PGC-SDD-DSM; (b) PGC-SDD; (c) PGC-Arctan; (d) PGC-DCM

Fig. 2. Demodulation signals of different PGC demodulation algorithms with C=1.5 rad, 2.0 rad, 2.5 rad, 3.0 rad and 3.5 rad. (a) PGC-SDD-DSM; (b) PGC-SDD; (c) PGC-Arctan; (d) PGC-DCM

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 3. Schematic of experimental setup

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 4. Original signal

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 5. Demodulation time domain results of different PGC algorithms when C=1.5 rad. (a) PGC-DCM; (b) PGC-Arctan; (c) PGC-SDD; (d) PGC-SDD-DSM

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 6. Frequency spectrums of the demodulation results of different PGC algorithms when C=1.5 rad. (a) PGC-DCM; (b) PGC-Arctan; (c) PGC-SDD; (d) PGC-SDD-DSM

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 7. THD of the proposed PGC algorithm with modulation depth C

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 8. SINAD of the proposed PGC algorithm with modulation depth C

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 9. Demodulated signal waveform (red) and original signal (blue)

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 10. Demodulated signal waveform (green) and original signal (blue)

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 11. Dynamic range of the demodulation system based on the PGC-SDD-DSM algorithm

Download full size | View in the Article

Parameters	Demodulation formula	Modulation depth(C)	Light intensity disturbance(LID)	Total harmonic distortion(THD)
PGC-DCM	$S_{PGC - DCM} (t) = B^{2} G H J_{1} (C) J_{2} (C) φ (t)$	Sensitive	Sensitive	Low THD
PGC-Arctan	$S_{PGC - Arctan} (t) = arctan {[\frac{G J_{1} (C)}{H J_{2} (C)}] \tan φ (t)}$	Sensitive	Non-sensitive	High THD
PGC-SDD	$S_{PGC - SDD} (t) = [J_{1} (C) / J_{2} (C)] \cdot φ (t)$	Sensitive	Non-sensitive	Low THD
PGC-SDD-DSM	$S_{PGC - SDD - DSM} = φ (t)$	Non-sensitive	Non-sensitive	Low THD

Table 1. Comparisons of four PGC demodulation algorithms

View in the Article

	PGC-DCM	PGC-Arctan	PGC-SDD	PGC-SDD-DSM
SINAD/dB	24.69	11.37	29.18	35.56
THD/ (%)	0.060	0.690	0.057	0.047

Table 2. Performance comparison of demodulation results of four algorithms

Download Citation

Save the article for my favorites

Paper Information